A Content Analysis of Patient Perception of Feeling Safe during Hospitalization

Sahar Dabaghi, M. Zandi, A. Aabaszadeh, A. Ebadi
{"title":"A Content Analysis of Patient Perception of Feeling Safe during Hospitalization","authors":"Sahar Dabaghi, M. Zandi, A. Aabaszadeh, A. Ebadi","doi":"10.22038/EBCJ.2020.47330.2284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients are meticulous supervisors of their self-care. Their perceptions and experiences play a significant role in their awareness of the overt and covert problems in the healthcare settings. However, few studies have focused on the exact details of the nature of safety experienced only by the patients. \nAim: This study aimed to carry out the conventional content analysis of patients’ feelings of safety during hospitalization. \nMethod: This qualitative study was conducted on a total of 31 patients hospitalized in various wards of hospitals affiliated to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran, using purposive sampling in 2019. The data, obtained through semi-structured interviews, were analyzed by conventional content analysis using Graneheim and Lundman’s approach (2004) with MAXQDA software (version 2010). \nResults: Finally, data analysis resulted in the establishment of three main categories, namely feeling of insecurity, insolvency, and seeking safety and security. \nImplications for Practice: The obtained results of the present study can be helpful in designing a patient-based care program focusing on patient safety. The healthcare team can improve patient care through the consideration of factors contributing to the feeling of safety in patients.","PeriodicalId":37304,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Care Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"37-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/EBCJ.2020.47330.2284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Patients are meticulous supervisors of their self-care. Their perceptions and experiences play a significant role in their awareness of the overt and covert problems in the healthcare settings. However, few studies have focused on the exact details of the nature of safety experienced only by the patients. Aim: This study aimed to carry out the conventional content analysis of patients’ feelings of safety during hospitalization. Method: This qualitative study was conducted on a total of 31 patients hospitalized in various wards of hospitals affiliated to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran, using purposive sampling in 2019. The data, obtained through semi-structured interviews, were analyzed by conventional content analysis using Graneheim and Lundman’s approach (2004) with MAXQDA software (version 2010). Results: Finally, data analysis resulted in the establishment of three main categories, namely feeling of insecurity, insolvency, and seeking safety and security. Implications for Practice: The obtained results of the present study can be helpful in designing a patient-based care program focusing on patient safety. The healthcare team can improve patient care through the consideration of factors contributing to the feeling of safety in patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院患者安全感感知的内容分析
背景:患者是自我护理的细致监督者。他们的看法和经验在他们对医疗保健环境中公开和隐蔽问题的认识中起着重要作用。然而,很少有研究关注仅由患者体验的安全性质的确切细节。目的:本研究旨在对住院患者的安全感进行常规内容分析。方法:采用目的抽样方法,对2019年伊朗德黑兰沙希德·贝赫什蒂医科大学附属医院各病房住院的31例患者进行定性研究。通过半结构化访谈获得的数据,采用Graneheim和Lundman的方法(2004),采用MAXQDA软件(2010版),通过传统的内容分析进行分析。结果:最后,通过数据分析,建立了三个主要类别,即不安全感、资不抵债和寻求安全和保障。实践启示:本研究所得结果有助于设计以病人为本、以病人安全为重点的护理方案。医疗团队可以通过考虑有助于患者安全感的因素来改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence Based Care Journal
Evidence Based Care Journal Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Evidence Based Care Journal (EBCJ) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of patient care. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports patient care in practice. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, EBCJ seeks to enrich insight into clinical needs and the implications for patient care intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on clinical practicality of research findings and strength of study design. EBCJ is essential reading for anyone involved in healthcare professions, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on patient care.
期刊最新文献
Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Health System: A Systematic Review Comparison of the effect of abdominal massage and Hugo point acupressure on infantile colic symptoms1 Fathers Involvement with Developmental care of their Preterm Newborns and its Impact on the Bonding and Self-Efficacy: a nonrandomized clinical trial The effect of spiritual intelligence training on the hope and self-transcendence in mothers of premature neonates Comparison between Emergency Severity Index plus Capnometer and Emergency Severity Index in the dyspneic patients with Chronic Heart failure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1