A mixed methods study of architectural education during the initial COVID-19 lockdown: student experiences in design studio and technology courses

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 0 ARCHITECTURE Open House International Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1108/ohi-09-2021-0206
Ramy Bakir, S. Alsaadani
{"title":"A mixed methods study of architectural education during the initial COVID-19 lockdown: student experiences in design studio and technology courses","authors":"Ramy Bakir, S. Alsaadani","doi":"10.1108/ohi-09-2021-0206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe paper aims to understand and assess architecture students' experiences of online teaching during the initial lockdown caused by the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic between March–June 2020. The exploratory study was conducted across two architectural engineering departments of two separate campuses of the same not-for-profit, non-governmental higher education institution in Cairo, Egypt, focusing on two course streams within their architectural curriculum; design-studio-based courses (DC) and technology courses (TC).Design/methodology/approachA mixed-methods approach was used, where a questionnaire-based survey was developed to gather qualitative and quantitative data based on perceptions of a sample of 245 students. The survey quantitatively queried five dimensions related to students' learning experiences and qualitatively sought to evaluate both the positive experiences and challenges the students experienced.FindingsFindings outline that students' experiences were neutral but veered toward the positive end of the scale. Three factors appear to have affected students' learning experiences; students' reliance on educational technologies, the stage of architectural education students were enrolled in when they went into lockdown, and finally, quality and timing of feedback received. While challenges were faced during transition to the digital realm, these may have compelled students to take ownership of the students' own knowledge construction.Originality/valueResults provide a nuanced understanding of how students dealt with this critical transformation in architectural pedagogy at a unique moment in history, highlighting merits that could have an everlasting impact on design education during and after times of pandemic.","PeriodicalId":44969,"journal":{"name":"Open House International","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open House International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ohi-09-2021-0206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

PurposeThe paper aims to understand and assess architecture students' experiences of online teaching during the initial lockdown caused by the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic between March–June 2020. The exploratory study was conducted across two architectural engineering departments of two separate campuses of the same not-for-profit, non-governmental higher education institution in Cairo, Egypt, focusing on two course streams within their architectural curriculum; design-studio-based courses (DC) and technology courses (TC).Design/methodology/approachA mixed-methods approach was used, where a questionnaire-based survey was developed to gather qualitative and quantitative data based on perceptions of a sample of 245 students. The survey quantitatively queried five dimensions related to students' learning experiences and qualitatively sought to evaluate both the positive experiences and challenges the students experienced.FindingsFindings outline that students' experiences were neutral but veered toward the positive end of the scale. Three factors appear to have affected students' learning experiences; students' reliance on educational technologies, the stage of architectural education students were enrolled in when they went into lockdown, and finally, quality and timing of feedback received. While challenges were faced during transition to the digital realm, these may have compelled students to take ownership of the students' own knowledge construction.Originality/valueResults provide a nuanced understanding of how students dealt with this critical transformation in architectural pedagogy at a unique moment in history, highlighting merits that could have an everlasting impact on design education during and after times of pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在最初的COVID-19封锁期间,建筑教育的混合方法研究:学生在设计工作室和技术课程中的经历
目的了解和评估2020年3月至6月新冠肺炎疫情初期封锁期间建筑系学生在线教学体验。探索性研究是在埃及开罗同一所非营利性非政府高等教育机构的两个不同校区的两个建筑工程系进行的,重点是建筑课程中的两个课程流;设计工作室课程(DC)和技术课程(TC)。设计/方法/方法采用了混合方法,其中开发了一项基于问卷的调查,根据245名学生样本的看法收集定性和定量数据。该调查定量地询问了与学生学习经历相关的五个维度,并定性地寻求评估学生所经历的积极经历和挑战。调查结果显示,学生们的经历是中性的,但却转向了积极的一端。三个因素似乎影响了学生的学习经历;学生对教育技术的依赖,建筑教育学生进入封锁时所处的阶段,最后,收到的反馈的质量和时间。虽然在向数字领域过渡的过程中面临着挑战,但这些挑战可能迫使学生承担起自己知识建构的责任。独创性/价值结果提供了一个细致入微的理解,学生如何在历史上独特的时刻处理建筑教学法的关键转变,突出了在流行病期间和之后可能对设计教育产生持久影响的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The journal of an association of institues and individuals concerned with housing, design and development in the built environment. Theories, tools and pratice with special emphasis on the local scale.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of earthquake resilience factors for buildings: the case of Istanbul high-rise buildings Geometric analysis of early Ottoman tombs within the context of conservation studies Public participation in the social sustainability evaluation of smart city infrastructure in the context of big data: a critical review Teaching parametric design: fostering algorithmic thinking through incomplete recipes Spatial accessibility dynamics of urban parks in Nanjing, China: implications for spatial equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1