Effect of Anatomical Location of Dental Implants in the Mandible on Generation of Metal Artifacts on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Azade Farhangnia, Zoherh Reyhani, Parisa Farhangnia, Bahareh Hekmat
{"title":"Effect of Anatomical Location of Dental Implants in the Mandible on Generation of Metal Artifacts on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans","authors":"Azade Farhangnia, Zoherh Reyhani, Parisa Farhangnia, Bahareh Hekmat","doi":"10.34172/ajdr.2022.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Metal artifacts are the major weak points of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. This study aimed to quantify the amount of metal artifacts generated by dental implants placed in different anatomical locations in the mandible on CBCT scans. Methods: In this study, 98 CBCT scans of mandibular dental implants with prosthetic crowns were randomly selected irrespective of the age and gender of the patients. Of all 98 implants, 42 were placed in the anterior mandible and 56 were placed in the posterior mandible. The samples were divided into two groups of single and multiple implants. The CBCT scans of each implant were evaluated in apical and cervical cross-sections. The amount of metal artifacts generated around the implants was calculated. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test at 0.05 level of significance. Results: Higher amounts of artifacts were noted in the anterior mandible compared to the posterior mandible. Additionally, the amount of artifacts was higher in the cervical cross-section than in the apical cross-section. The difference in the amount of artifacts generated in the cervical cross-section was significant between single and multiple implants (P<0.05). However, this difference was not significant in the apical cross-section (P>0.05). Conclusions: Dental implants always generate metal artifacts on CBCT scans, and the amount of generated artifacts is influenced by the anatomical location of implants in the mandibular arch.","PeriodicalId":8679,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Dental Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ajdr.2022.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Metal artifacts are the major weak points of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. This study aimed to quantify the amount of metal artifacts generated by dental implants placed in different anatomical locations in the mandible on CBCT scans. Methods: In this study, 98 CBCT scans of mandibular dental implants with prosthetic crowns were randomly selected irrespective of the age and gender of the patients. Of all 98 implants, 42 were placed in the anterior mandible and 56 were placed in the posterior mandible. The samples were divided into two groups of single and multiple implants. The CBCT scans of each implant were evaluated in apical and cervical cross-sections. The amount of metal artifacts generated around the implants was calculated. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test at 0.05 level of significance. Results: Higher amounts of artifacts were noted in the anterior mandible compared to the posterior mandible. Additionally, the amount of artifacts was higher in the cervical cross-section than in the apical cross-section. The difference in the amount of artifacts generated in the cervical cross-section was significant between single and multiple implants (P<0.05). However, this difference was not significant in the apical cross-section (P>0.05). Conclusions: Dental implants always generate metal artifacts on CBCT scans, and the amount of generated artifacts is influenced by the anatomical location of implants in the mandibular arch.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下颌种植体的解剖位置对锥形束计算机断层扫描中金属伪影产生的影响
背景:金属伪影是锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的主要弱点。本研究旨在量化CBCT扫描中放置在下颌骨不同解剖位置的牙种植体产生的金属伪影数量。方法:在本研究中,随机选择98例带修复冠的下颌种植体的CBCT扫描,而不考虑患者的年龄和性别。在所有98个种植体中,42个放置在前下颌骨,56个放置在后下颌骨。将标本分为单种植体组和多种植体组。每个植入物的CBCT扫描在根尖和颈椎横截面上进行评估。计算了植入物周围产生的金属伪影的数量。数据分析采用Mann-Whitney U检验,显著性水平为0.05。结果:与后下颌骨相比,前下颌骨出现了更多的假体。此外,颈椎横截面的假影量高于根尖横截面。单次种植体与多次种植体在颈椎横截面上产生的假影数量差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:种植体在CBCT扫描中会产生金属伪影,其数量受种植体在下颌弓的解剖位置的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Iranian Dentists’ Practice Patterns Antibacterial Activity of Different Artemisia dracunculus Extracts Against Dental Caries-Related Pathogens The Second Case Report of Cellular Cannibalism in Ameloblastoma Comparison of Repair Bond Strength of Bulk-fill and Conventional Composites With Different Bonding Systems Treatment Options for Oral Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Maxilla: A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1