Integrating Lawyers into the Perinatal Health Care Team: Initial Findings From an Innovative Medical–Legal Partnership [ID: 1377957]

Roxana Richardson, Lisa P. Kessler, L. Patchen, D. Perry, Caitlin Schille Jensen, A. Thomas
{"title":"Integrating Lawyers into the Perinatal Health Care Team: Initial Findings From an Innovative Medical–Legal Partnership [ID: 1377957]","authors":"Roxana Richardson, Lisa P. Kessler, L. Patchen, D. Perry, Caitlin Schille Jensen, A. Thomas","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000930236.89093.3c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Health-harming legal needs (HHLNs), social determinants of health that have a legal remedy, are drivers of poor health outcomes for Black women and children. HHLNs include inadequate access to safe housing, employment accommodations, and income supports. A medical–legal partnership (MLP) adds an attorney to the health care team to address patients’ HHLNs in a variety of health care settings. The Perinatal LAW Project (P-LAW), an MLP between the Georgetown University Health Justice Alliance and MedStar Washington Hospital Center Women’s & Infants’ Services, addresses perinatal patients’ HHLNs in an obstetrics and gynecology practice. METHODS: Perinatal LAW Project attorneys record client and case data in a legal case management system. The research team analyzed data for the first 18 months of the program (March 2021 to September 2022). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients were referred for legal assistance, primarily by social workers and health navigators. Most patients were in their second and third trimesters. The majority of patients were Black or African American, aged 20–34, and lived under 200% FPL. The most common legal issues were in the areas of employment (parental leave, discrimination), housing (conditions, eviction), public benefits (food stamps, disability benefits), and family law (child support, domestic violence). The P-LAW addressed 150 legal issues and served 117 patients. CONCLUSION: Medical–legal partnership is a novel approach to addressing maternal health disparities. In our experience, legal services have a high utilization rate and patients often have more than one legal need. Future efforts to measure patient outcomes, including reduced maternal stress and medical appointment attendance, will build the evidence base for MLP in the perinatal context.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930236.89093.3c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health-harming legal needs (HHLNs), social determinants of health that have a legal remedy, are drivers of poor health outcomes for Black women and children. HHLNs include inadequate access to safe housing, employment accommodations, and income supports. A medical–legal partnership (MLP) adds an attorney to the health care team to address patients’ HHLNs in a variety of health care settings. The Perinatal LAW Project (P-LAW), an MLP between the Georgetown University Health Justice Alliance and MedStar Washington Hospital Center Women’s & Infants’ Services, addresses perinatal patients’ HHLNs in an obstetrics and gynecology practice. METHODS: Perinatal LAW Project attorneys record client and case data in a legal case management system. The research team analyzed data for the first 18 months of the program (March 2021 to September 2022). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients were referred for legal assistance, primarily by social workers and health navigators. Most patients were in their second and third trimesters. The majority of patients were Black or African American, aged 20–34, and lived under 200% FPL. The most common legal issues were in the areas of employment (parental leave, discrimination), housing (conditions, eviction), public benefits (food stamps, disability benefits), and family law (child support, domestic violence). The P-LAW addressed 150 legal issues and served 117 patients. CONCLUSION: Medical–legal partnership is a novel approach to addressing maternal health disparities. In our experience, legal services have a high utilization rate and patients often have more than one legal need. Future efforts to measure patient outcomes, including reduced maternal stress and medical appointment attendance, will build the evidence base for MLP in the perinatal context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将律师融入围产期保健团队:创新医疗-法律伙伴关系的初步发现[ID: 1377957]
简介:危害健康的法律需求(hhln)是具有法律补救措施的健康的社会决定因素,是黑人妇女和儿童健康结果不佳的驱动因素。健康问题包括获得安全住房、就业场所和收入支持的机会不足。医疗-法律合作伙伴关系(MLP)在医疗团队中增加一名律师,以解决各种医疗保健环境中患者的hhln问题。围产期法律项目(P-LAW)是乔治城大学健康正义联盟和MedStar华盛顿医院中心妇女和婴儿服务之间的MLP,解决围产期患者在妇产科实践中的hhln问题。方法:围产期法律项目律师在法律案件管理系统中记录客户和案件数据。研究小组分析了该项目前18个月(2021年3月至2022年9月)的数据。结果:131名患者获得法律援助,主要由社会工作者和卫生导航员提供。大多数患者处于妊娠中期和晚期。大多数患者为黑人或非裔美国人,年龄在20-34岁,生活在200% FPL以下。最常见的法律问题是在就业(育儿假、歧视)、住房(条件、驱逐)、公共福利(食品券、残疾福利)和家庭法(子女抚养、家庭暴力)领域。P-LAW解决了150个法律问题,服务了117名患者。结论:医疗-法律伙伴关系是解决孕产妇健康差距的新途径。根据我们的经验,法律服务的使用率很高,病人往往有不止一种法律需求。未来努力衡量患者的结果,包括减少产妇压力和医疗预约出勤,将建立围产儿背景下MLP的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Agreement. A Prospective Study to Assess for Histologic Changes on Vulvar Biopsies in Postmenopausal Women With Lichen Sclerosus Treated With Fractionated CO2 Laser Therapy [ID: 1339895] Prescribing Patterns for Postpartum Contraception Among Breastfeeding Patients Insured Under Medicaid [ID: 1375071] Evaluation of Perioperative Factors Contributing to Organ Space Surgical Site Infection After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy [ID: 1374862] Delays in Diagnosis and Treatment of Appendicitis in Females [ID: 1375790]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1