Prediction on the Theoretical Strength of Diamond, c-Bn, Cu and CeO 2

Zhao-Hua Liu, Biao Wang
{"title":"Prediction on the Theoretical Strength of Diamond, c-Bn, Cu and CeO 2","authors":"Zhao-Hua Liu, Biao Wang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3820203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theoretical (ideal) strength is the upper strength limit that any solid can withstand. Estimation of the theoretical strength of materials is vital for their applications. In material science field, the Griffith theory is the most widely used criterion for estimating the theoretical strength materials which sets an upper bound strength of ~ E/9. Besides, Frenkel and Orowan-Polanyi’s derivation from the force-displacement relationship using the sinusoidal correlation also gives a similar value of ~ E/10. Recently, with the improved quality of fabricated samples, people have reported the possibility of reaching or exceeding the theoretical strength. In this work, first-principles calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) is used to study the theoretical strength of four representative materials (diamond, <i>c</i>-BN, Cu, and CeO<sup>2</sup>) under uniaxial tensile loading along the low-index crystallographic directions. The results demonstrate that the theoretical strength of materials exhibit strong anisotropy. It is found that the ideal strength calculated by DFT is larger than the ideal strength predicted by Griffith theory or the approximate value of E/10, in all the four materials along some specific directions. This discrepancy is explained by the analysis of the fracture mechanism. In addition, based on the stability analysis of thermodynamical systems, the strength criterion based on the energy-strain relation was established which is verified by the DFT results.","PeriodicalId":18279,"journal":{"name":"MatSciRN: Computational Studies of Inorganic & Organic Materials (Topic)","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MatSciRN: Computational Studies of Inorganic & Organic Materials (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3820203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The theoretical (ideal) strength is the upper strength limit that any solid can withstand. Estimation of the theoretical strength of materials is vital for their applications. In material science field, the Griffith theory is the most widely used criterion for estimating the theoretical strength materials which sets an upper bound strength of ~ E/9. Besides, Frenkel and Orowan-Polanyi’s derivation from the force-displacement relationship using the sinusoidal correlation also gives a similar value of ~ E/10. Recently, with the improved quality of fabricated samples, people have reported the possibility of reaching or exceeding the theoretical strength. In this work, first-principles calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) is used to study the theoretical strength of four representative materials (diamond, c-BN, Cu, and CeO2) under uniaxial tensile loading along the low-index crystallographic directions. The results demonstrate that the theoretical strength of materials exhibit strong anisotropy. It is found that the ideal strength calculated by DFT is larger than the ideal strength predicted by Griffith theory or the approximate value of E/10, in all the four materials along some specific directions. This discrepancy is explained by the analysis of the fracture mechanism. In addition, based on the stability analysis of thermodynamical systems, the strength criterion based on the energy-strain relation was established which is verified by the DFT results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金刚石、c-Bn、Cu和ceo2的理论强度预测
理论(理想)强度是任何固体所能承受的强度上限。材料理论强度的估计对其应用是至关重要的。在材料科学领域,Griffith理论是估计材料理论强度的最广泛的准则,其强度上限为~ E/9。此外,Frenkel和Orowan-Polanyi利用正弦相关推导出的力-位移关系也给出了类似的~ E/10值。最近,随着制备样品质量的提高,人们报道了达到或超过理论强度的可能性。本文采用基于密度泛函理论(DFT)的第一性原理计算方法,研究了四种代表性材料(金刚石、c-BN、Cu和CeO2)在低指数晶体学方向单轴拉伸载荷下的理论强度。结果表明,材料的理论强度表现出较强的各向异性。在某些特定方向上,四种材料的DFT计算的理想强度均大于Griffith理论预测的理想强度或E/10的近近值。断裂机理分析解释了这一差异。此外,基于热力学系统的稳定性分析,建立了基于能量-应变关系的强度准则,并通过DFT结果进行了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identification and Source Analysis of Volatile Flavor Compounds in Paper Packaged Yogurt by Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Effects of Geometric Array and Size of Internal Voids on Tensile Ductility of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Sheets Catalytic Conversion of High Fructose Corn Syrup to Methyl Lactate with Coo@Silicalite-1 Facilitation of Detwinning Through Controlling Crystal Structure in Ti-Zr-Ni-Pd High Temperature Shape Memory Alloys Transformation of Calcite CaCO3 to Fluorite CaF2 by Action of KF Solution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1