An assessment of different extraction and quantification methods of penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene from SRF fly-ash

Dimitris E. Balampanis, Frédéric Coulon, Nigel Simms, Philip Longhurst, Simon J.T. Pollard, Cecilia Fenech, Raffaella Villa
{"title":"An assessment of different extraction and quantification methods of penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene from SRF fly-ash","authors":"Dimitris E. Balampanis,&nbsp;Frédéric Coulon,&nbsp;Nigel Simms,&nbsp;Philip Longhurst,&nbsp;Simon J.T. Pollard,&nbsp;Cecilia Fenech,&nbsp;Raffaella Villa","doi":"10.1016/j.ancr.2017.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Highly chlorinated benzenes, produced in the presence of organic matter and chlorine, are considered PCDD/Fs precursors, and are used as cost and time convenient substitute indicators for the indirect measurement of the latter. In this study penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene are quantified for the determination of the organochloride load of fly ash from solid recovered fuel incineration. Some of the chlorobenzenes are formed under <em>‘de novo’</em> conditions, through heterogeneous (ash particles/flue gases) reactions and are therefore deeply incorporated within fly ash. Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and ultrasonic solvent extraction (USE), along with the equivalent clean-up methods suggested by literature were compared to traditional Soxhlet. The extraction efficiencies achieved were 83 ± 7.5% for Soxhlet, 111 ± 19% for PFE, and 67 ± 17% for ultrasonication. Soxhlet extraction and clean-up through a multilayer silica gel column gave more precise results compared to the other sample preparation methods. Furthermore, performance comparison of gas chromatography fitted with either a mass spectrometer operated in single ion monitoring mode (GC-MS-SIM), or electron capture detector (GC- ECD) highlighted that ECD can be used for measuring chlorobenzenes traces down to 0.21 ng g<sup>−1</sup>, when the equivalent LOQ for MS-SIM was 3.26 ng g<sup>−1</sup>. The results further suggest that ECD can provide better peak integration than MS-SIM in the detection of chlorobenzenes in fly ash extracts, due to the detector's sensitivity to halogenated compounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7819,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"Pages 28-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ancr.2017.01.003","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214181216300544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Highly chlorinated benzenes, produced in the presence of organic matter and chlorine, are considered PCDD/Fs precursors, and are used as cost and time convenient substitute indicators for the indirect measurement of the latter. In this study penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene are quantified for the determination of the organochloride load of fly ash from solid recovered fuel incineration. Some of the chlorobenzenes are formed under ‘de novo’ conditions, through heterogeneous (ash particles/flue gases) reactions and are therefore deeply incorporated within fly ash. Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and ultrasonic solvent extraction (USE), along with the equivalent clean-up methods suggested by literature were compared to traditional Soxhlet. The extraction efficiencies achieved were 83 ± 7.5% for Soxhlet, 111 ± 19% for PFE, and 67 ± 17% for ultrasonication. Soxhlet extraction and clean-up through a multilayer silica gel column gave more precise results compared to the other sample preparation methods. Furthermore, performance comparison of gas chromatography fitted with either a mass spectrometer operated in single ion monitoring mode (GC-MS-SIM), or electron capture detector (GC- ECD) highlighted that ECD can be used for measuring chlorobenzenes traces down to 0.21 ng g−1, when the equivalent LOQ for MS-SIM was 3.26 ng g−1. The results further suggest that ECD can provide better peak integration than MS-SIM in the detection of chlorobenzenes in fly ash extracts, due to the detector's sensitivity to halogenated compounds.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SRF粉煤灰中五氯苯和六氯苯不同提取和定量方法的评价
在存在有机物和氯的情况下产生的高氯化苯被认为是PCDD/Fs前体,并被用作间接测量后者的成本和时间方便的替代指标。在本研究中,五氯苯和六氯苯的定量用于测定固体回收燃料焚烧飞灰的有机氯负荷。有些氯苯是在“从头”条件下通过非均相(灰颗粒/烟道气)反应形成的,因此深深融入飞灰中。将加速溶剂萃取法(ASE)和超声溶剂萃取法(USE)以及文献中提出的等效清洗方法与传统索氏法进行了比较。索氏法提取率为83±7.5%,PFE法为111±19%,超声法为67±17%。与其他样品制备方法相比,通过多层硅胶柱进行索氏提取和清理的结果更为精确。此外,将单离子监测模式下的质谱仪(GC-MS-SIM)和电子捕获检测器(GC- ECD)的气相色谱性能进行比较,发现当MS-SIM的等效LOQ为3.26 ng g - 1时,ECD可用于测量低至0.21 ng g - 1的氯苯痕量。结果进一步表明,由于检测器对卤化化合物的敏感性,ECD比MS-SIM在检测粉煤灰提取物中氯苯方面可以提供更好的峰积分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chemically modified carbon paste ion-selective electrodes for determination of atorvastatin calcium in pharmaceutical preparations Preparation and characterization of a novel Co(II) optode based on polymer inclusion membrane Structural identification and estimation of Rosuvastatin calcium related impurities in Rosuvastatin calcium tablet dosage form Comparative sensing of aldehyde and ammonia vapours on synthetic polypyrrole-Sn(IV)arsenotungstate nanocomposite cation exchange material Nano clay Ni/NiO nanocomposite new sorbent for separation and preconcentration dibenzothiophene from crude prior to UV–vis spectrophotometery determination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1