Abstract 2612: Personalized cancer risk and prevention: analysis of risk factors for specific cancers and integration into cancer risk assessment paradigms

R. Elespuru, Catherine G. Fischer
{"title":"Abstract 2612: Personalized cancer risk and prevention: analysis of risk factors for specific cancers and integration into cancer risk assessment paradigms","authors":"R. Elespuru, Catherine G. Fischer","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-2612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cancer risk assessment is performed generally in relation to assessment of the safety of new medical products or environmental exposures, especially when DNA modification is a factor. The risk assessment paradigms used for products subject to regulatory review are independent of specific cancers, multiple exposures, and individual risk factors. A default cancer risk assessment for regulatory review includes “uncertainty factors” to account for differential susceptibility and other variables involved in extrapolating from experimental systems to human risk. However, there is a growing amount of evidence that suggests differing risk for different types of cancer as well as the importance of combinations of risk factors not limited to genetic or environmental effects. In the era of personalized medicine and cancer genomics, can we begin to assess personalized cancer risk, instead of overall cancer risk? What models would assist in this paradigm shift? There are several cancers for which specific genetic, environmental, viral and other associations have been established and could be used in personalized cancer risk assessments, including colon, liver, and lung cancer. A search was conducted on PubMed for available literature on epidemiology, genetic susceptibility, and risk factors associated with the major types of cancer, including ~25 pathological types of cancer in 17 different organs. Risk factors associated with each included chemical exposures and tobacco, as well as genetic, epigenetic, microbial, viral, dietary, exercise, and other factors known for involvement in the development of cancer in humans. The diversity of cancers and evidence for specific risk factors is summarized. Common risk factors, including smoking and obesity, are supplemented with a substantial set of individual, often non-overlapping risk factors for diverse cancers. Surprisingly, little evidence was found that genetic-environmental interactions are significant risk factors for most cancers. From this assessment we can begin to ask whether and for what cancers a personalized risk approach seems feasible. Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy. Citation Format: Rosalie K. Elespuru, Catherine Fischer. Personalized cancer risk and prevention: analysis of risk factors for specific cancers and integration into cancer risk assessment paradigms [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2612.","PeriodicalId":20290,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-2612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancer risk assessment is performed generally in relation to assessment of the safety of new medical products or environmental exposures, especially when DNA modification is a factor. The risk assessment paradigms used for products subject to regulatory review are independent of specific cancers, multiple exposures, and individual risk factors. A default cancer risk assessment for regulatory review includes “uncertainty factors” to account for differential susceptibility and other variables involved in extrapolating from experimental systems to human risk. However, there is a growing amount of evidence that suggests differing risk for different types of cancer as well as the importance of combinations of risk factors not limited to genetic or environmental effects. In the era of personalized medicine and cancer genomics, can we begin to assess personalized cancer risk, instead of overall cancer risk? What models would assist in this paradigm shift? There are several cancers for which specific genetic, environmental, viral and other associations have been established and could be used in personalized cancer risk assessments, including colon, liver, and lung cancer. A search was conducted on PubMed for available literature on epidemiology, genetic susceptibility, and risk factors associated with the major types of cancer, including ~25 pathological types of cancer in 17 different organs. Risk factors associated with each included chemical exposures and tobacco, as well as genetic, epigenetic, microbial, viral, dietary, exercise, and other factors known for involvement in the development of cancer in humans. The diversity of cancers and evidence for specific risk factors is summarized. Common risk factors, including smoking and obesity, are supplemented with a substantial set of individual, often non-overlapping risk factors for diverse cancers. Surprisingly, little evidence was found that genetic-environmental interactions are significant risk factors for most cancers. From this assessment we can begin to ask whether and for what cancers a personalized risk approach seems feasible. Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy. Citation Format: Rosalie K. Elespuru, Catherine Fischer. Personalized cancer risk and prevention: analysis of risk factors for specific cancers and integration into cancer risk assessment paradigms [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2612.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2612:个性化癌症风险与预防:特定癌症的危险因素分析并整合到癌症风险评估范式中
癌症风险评估通常与评估新医疗产品的安全性或环境暴露有关,特别是当DNA修饰是一个因素时。用于接受监管审查的产品的风险评估范式独立于特定的癌症、多重暴露和个人风险因素。监管审查的默认癌症风险评估包括“不确定性因素”,以解释从实验系统推断人类风险时涉及的不同易感性和其他变量。然而,越来越多的证据表明,不同类型的癌症有不同的风险,以及不限于遗传或环境影响的风险因素组合的重要性。在个体化医疗和癌症基因组学时代,我们能否开始评估个体化癌症风险,而不是整体癌症风险?哪些模型将有助于这种范式转变?有几种癌症已经与特定的基因、环境、病毒和其他因素建立了联系,可以用于个性化的癌症风险评估,包括结肠癌、肝癌和肺癌。在PubMed上检索了与主要癌症类型相关的流行病学、遗传易感性和危险因素的现有文献,包括17个不同器官的约25种病理类型的癌症。与每种疾病相关的风险因素包括化学物质暴露和烟草,以及遗传、表观遗传、微生物、病毒、饮食、运动和其他已知与人类癌症发展有关的因素。总结了癌症的多样性和特定危险因素的证据。常见的危险因素,包括吸烟和肥胖,补充了大量不同癌症的个体,通常不重叠的危险因素。令人惊讶的是,几乎没有证据表明遗传-环境相互作用是大多数癌症的重要危险因素。根据这一评估,我们可以开始问,针对哪些癌症,个性化的风险方法是否可行。免责声明:本报告中的发现和结论是作者的观点,不应被解释为代表任何机构的决定或政策。引文格式:Rosalie K. Elespuru, Catherine Fischer。个性化癌症风险与预防:分析特定癌症的危险因素并将其纳入癌症风险评估范式[摘要]。见:美国癌症研究协会2021年年会论文集;2021年4月10日至15日和5月17日至21日。费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2021;81(13 -增刊):2612。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract LB226: Maternal microbiome protects host against clonal de novo transformation, early onset systemic metastasis, and sudden death Abstract 2525: Low frequency TP53 mutations in airway epithelial cells serve as lung cancer risk biomarker Abstract 2540: Belief in research, religious coping, and willingness to participate in clinical trials among African Americans with hematologic malignancies: a pilot study Abstract 2560: Plasticity-related signaling pathways in the medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus as potential targets of the antidepressant vortioxetine in reversing cognitive impairments after androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer Abstract 2596: Stage-specific inhibition of NNK-induced lung carcinogenesis by 1,4-phenylenebis(methylene)seleno-aspirin (p-XS-Asp)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1