Therapy of patients with COVID-19: clinical studies and recommendations in different countries

S. Zaikov
{"title":"Therapy of patients with COVID-19: clinical studies and recommendations in different countries","authors":"S. Zaikov","doi":"10.32902/2663-0338-2020-4-5-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND. During 2020 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is at the focus of many scientific studies. National approaches to the management of conditions associated with the SARS-CoV-2 can differ significantly due to socio-economic characteristics, capabilities of the health care system in different regions of the world, inertion in making regulatory decisions, as well as the variability and limitations of evidence base regarding effectiveness of various therapeutic approaches. \nOBJECTIVE. To review guidelines and clinical experience in the management of patients with COVID-19 around the world. \nRESULTS. National guidelines for COVID-19 management can vary significantly in different regions of the world. The governments of each country, in cooperation with leading experts and taking into account global experience, choose and constantly adjust the best ways to overcome COVID-19 epidemic in local population. \nCONCLUSIONS. The choice of methods for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 is associated with the capabilities of the healthcare system, regional level of antibiotic resistance, current epidemiological conditions, socio-economic factors, etc. Over the past 5-6 months the epidemiological conditions in different regions of the world have varied significantly, which could create unequal conditions for conducting high-quality clinical trials with a large number of participants. Even within one country the conclusions and recommendations for the treatment of COVID-19 developed by different medical associations and expert groups may differ significantly. Expert organizations conduct an independent evaluation of emerging clinical experience in the treatment of COVID-19 and come to different conclusions. This phenomenon is quite normal and desirable to minimize systematic error in the context of rapidly updating clinical evidence.","PeriodicalId":13681,"journal":{"name":"Infusion & Chemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infusion & Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32902/2663-0338-2020-4-5-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND. During 2020 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is at the focus of many scientific studies. National approaches to the management of conditions associated with the SARS-CoV-2 can differ significantly due to socio-economic characteristics, capabilities of the health care system in different regions of the world, inertion in making regulatory decisions, as well as the variability and limitations of evidence base regarding effectiveness of various therapeutic approaches. OBJECTIVE. To review guidelines and clinical experience in the management of patients with COVID-19 around the world. RESULTS. National guidelines for COVID-19 management can vary significantly in different regions of the world. The governments of each country, in cooperation with leading experts and taking into account global experience, choose and constantly adjust the best ways to overcome COVID-19 epidemic in local population. CONCLUSIONS. The choice of methods for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 is associated with the capabilities of the healthcare system, regional level of antibiotic resistance, current epidemiological conditions, socio-economic factors, etc. Over the past 5-6 months the epidemiological conditions in different regions of the world have varied significantly, which could create unequal conditions for conducting high-quality clinical trials with a large number of participants. Even within one country the conclusions and recommendations for the treatment of COVID-19 developed by different medical associations and expert groups may differ significantly. Expert organizations conduct an independent evaluation of emerging clinical experience in the treatment of COVID-19 and come to different conclusions. This phenomenon is quite normal and desirable to minimize systematic error in the context of rapidly updating clinical evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19患者的治疗:不同国家的临床研究和建议
背景。2020年,冠状病毒病(COVID-19)是许多科学研究的重点。由于社会经济特征、世界不同地区卫生保健系统的能力、制定监管决策的意愿,以及各种治疗方法有效性的证据基础的可变性和局限性,各国管理与SARS-CoV-2相关疾病的方法可能存在很大差异。目标。审查世界各地COVID-19患者管理的指南和临床经验。结果。世界不同区域的国家COVID-19管理指南可能存在很大差异。各国政府与权威专家合作,结合国际经验,选择并不断调整应对当地疫情的最佳方式。结论。COVID-19预防和治疗方法的选择与卫生保健系统的能力、区域抗生素耐药性水平、当前流行病学状况、社会经济因素等有关。在过去5-6个月里,世界不同区域的流行病学情况差别很大,这可能为开展有大量参与者的高质量临床试验创造了不平等的条件。即使在一个国家内,不同医学协会和专家组提出的治疗COVID-19的结论和建议也可能存在很大差异。专家组织对新出现的COVID-19治疗临床经验进行了独立评估,并得出了不同的结论。这种现象是很正常的,在快速更新临床证据的背景下尽量减少系统误差是可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the effectiveness of immunomodulator BI-V in the complex therapy of children and adolescents with multiple drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis Features of the course of pulmonary tuberculosis against the background of coronavirus infection according to computed tomography of the chest organs Risks of recurrence in people with pulmonary tuberculosis New and little-known possibilities of edaravone in the treatment of cerebral stroke and extracranial pathology Severe community-acquired pneumonia: principles of diagnostics and intensive therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1