7 Were the Vikings Really Green? Environmental Degradation and Social Inequality in Iceland's Second Nature Landscape

Kathryn A. Catlin, Douglas J. Bolender
{"title":"7 Were the Vikings Really Green? Environmental Degradation and Social Inequality in Iceland's Second Nature Landscape","authors":"Kathryn A. Catlin,&nbsp;Douglas J. Bolender","doi":"10.1111/apaa.12102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Iceland was settled by the Norse ca. 870 CE. Within the next few centuries, 40% of Iceland's soil cover was lost to deforestation and erosion. By the late medieval period, the social landscape had also changed from a population of nominally equal landowning households to one comprised mostly of tenant farmers subject to a small class of elite landlords. Interpretations of the changing landscape have described the Norse as unaware of the environmental consequences of their agricultural practices, or as thoughtfully responsive to degrading conditions. Using estimates of the available biomass in different regions and measurements of changing soil depth in lowland Langholt, Skagafjörður, we suggest that what appears to modern researchers as catastrophic environmental devastation was in part an agricultural benefit, at least to some people. While some farmers did well, others were forced to leave failing land and enter service or tenancy. At the same time, agricultural strategies focused on transhumant pastoralism and production of grass fodder created distinct changes to the landscape that reinforced the emerging social hierarchy until it came to seem natural and inevitable. We imagine the earliest Icelanders not as violent raiders of the landscape, nor as sensitive custodians of a changing environment, but as intelligent farmers and politicians who mobilized the transformed landscape into a political economy that would keep their farms productive and their descendants in power for a millennium.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100116,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association","volume":"29 1","pages":"120-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/apaa.12102","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apaa.12102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Iceland was settled by the Norse ca. 870 CE. Within the next few centuries, 40% of Iceland's soil cover was lost to deforestation and erosion. By the late medieval period, the social landscape had also changed from a population of nominally equal landowning households to one comprised mostly of tenant farmers subject to a small class of elite landlords. Interpretations of the changing landscape have described the Norse as unaware of the environmental consequences of their agricultural practices, or as thoughtfully responsive to degrading conditions. Using estimates of the available biomass in different regions and measurements of changing soil depth in lowland Langholt, Skagafjörður, we suggest that what appears to modern researchers as catastrophic environmental devastation was in part an agricultural benefit, at least to some people. While some farmers did well, others were forced to leave failing land and enter service or tenancy. At the same time, agricultural strategies focused on transhumant pastoralism and production of grass fodder created distinct changes to the landscape that reinforced the emerging social hierarchy until it came to seem natural and inevitable. We imagine the earliest Icelanders not as violent raiders of the landscape, nor as sensitive custodians of a changing environment, but as intelligent farmers and politicians who mobilized the transformed landscape into a political economy that would keep their farms productive and their descendants in power for a millennium.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维京人真的是绿色的吗?冰岛第二自然景观中的环境退化和社会不平等
大约在公元870年,挪威人在冰岛定居。在接下来的几个世纪里,冰岛40%的土壤覆盖面积因森林砍伐和侵蚀而消失。到中世纪晚期,社会格局也发生了变化,从名义上平等的拥有土地的家庭人口,转变为主要由受少数精英地主统治的佃农组成。对不断变化的景观的解释将挪威人描述为没有意识到他们的农业实践对环境的影响,或者对退化的条件做出了深思熟虑的反应。通过对不同地区可利用生物量的估计和对低地(Langholt, Skagafjörður)土壤深度变化的测量,我们认为,在现代研究人员看来,灾难性的环境破坏在一定程度上是农业的好处,至少对某些人来说是这样。虽然一些农民做得很好,但其他农民被迫离开贫瘠的土地,从事服务或租赁。与此同时,侧重于游牧和草料生产的农业战略给景观带来了明显的变化,加强了新兴的社会等级制度,直到它变得似乎是自然和不可避免的。在我们的想象中,最早的冰岛人不是暴力掠夺者,也不是变化环境的敏感守护者,而是聪明的农民和政治家,他们将变化的景观转化为一种政治经济,使他们的农场保持高产,并使他们的后代在一千年中掌权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chapter 7. Mapping land use with integrated environmental archaeological datasets Finding Fields: The Archaeology of Agricultural Landscapes Chapter 1. The state of the field: Emerging approaches to the archaeology of agricultural landscapes Chapter 2. Stone by stone: Women's quotidian farm labor and the construction of the Khutwaneng farmscape in Bokoni, South Africa Chapter 8. Isotopic evidence for protohistoric field locations in northeastern Illinois
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1