Evaluation of leukapheresis and leukapheresis with additional cytoreduction in acute leukemia with hyperleukocytosis

Tuğcan ALP KIRKIZLAR, A. Demir
{"title":"Evaluation of leukapheresis and leukapheresis with additional cytoreduction in acute leukemia with hyperleukocytosis","authors":"Tuğcan ALP KIRKIZLAR, A. Demir","doi":"10.46310/tjim.1270432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Hyperleukocytosis is a high-mortality emergency that must be diagnosed and treated promptly. The treatment options are low-dose cytosine arabinoside, hydroxyurea, steroids and leukapheresis. The risks and benefits of leukapheresis and leukapheresis with cytoreductive drugs in hyperleukocytosis are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of leukapheresis and the effect of adding cytoreductive drugs to leukapheresis in reducing leukocyte count and mortality in our patients. \nMaterial and Methods Thirty-four adult patients with acute leukaemia who underwent leukapheresis were included in this retrospective study. \nResults The median age was 66.5 years old, and 88.2% of the patients were acute myeloid leukaemia. The total number of leukapheresis was 69 cycles, and the median number of the procedure was 2. The most common symptoms were associated with the pulmonary system (67.6%). The median follow-up was 17.5 days. The mean reduction of leukocyte count was 69,112/mm3, and the efficacy of leukapheresis was 40.9%. The decrease in leukocyte and platelet counts was statistically significant when compared before and after leukapheresis. The mortality rate was 76.5% during hospitalization. While 24 patients received concomitant cytoreductive drugs with leukapheresis, ten did not. There was no statistically significant difference between these groups regarding reducing leukocyte count, efficiency of leukapheresis and mortality (p values 0.857, 0.562 and 0.553). \nConclusions In our study, we showed the efficacy of leukapheresis in hyperleukocytosis but failed to show any difference in leukocyte reduction or mortality with additional cytoreductive drugs. Leukapheresis with concomitant cytoreduction does not abolish or increase mortality.","PeriodicalId":23372,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46310/tjim.1270432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Hyperleukocytosis is a high-mortality emergency that must be diagnosed and treated promptly. The treatment options are low-dose cytosine arabinoside, hydroxyurea, steroids and leukapheresis. The risks and benefits of leukapheresis and leukapheresis with cytoreductive drugs in hyperleukocytosis are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of leukapheresis and the effect of adding cytoreductive drugs to leukapheresis in reducing leukocyte count and mortality in our patients. Material and Methods Thirty-four adult patients with acute leukaemia who underwent leukapheresis were included in this retrospective study. Results The median age was 66.5 years old, and 88.2% of the patients were acute myeloid leukaemia. The total number of leukapheresis was 69 cycles, and the median number of the procedure was 2. The most common symptoms were associated with the pulmonary system (67.6%). The median follow-up was 17.5 days. The mean reduction of leukocyte count was 69,112/mm3, and the efficacy of leukapheresis was 40.9%. The decrease in leukocyte and platelet counts was statistically significant when compared before and after leukapheresis. The mortality rate was 76.5% during hospitalization. While 24 patients received concomitant cytoreductive drugs with leukapheresis, ten did not. There was no statistically significant difference between these groups regarding reducing leukocyte count, efficiency of leukapheresis and mortality (p values 0.857, 0.562 and 0.553). Conclusions In our study, we showed the efficacy of leukapheresis in hyperleukocytosis but failed to show any difference in leukocyte reduction or mortality with additional cytoreductive drugs. Leukapheresis with concomitant cytoreduction does not abolish or increase mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性白血病伴白细胞增多症的白细胞分离和白细胞分离伴额外细胞减少的评价
背景:白细胞增多症是一种高死亡率的急症,必须及时诊断和治疗。治疗选择是低剂量胞嘧啶阿拉伯糖、羟基脲、类固醇和白细胞分离。白细胞分离和白细胞分离联合细胞减少药物治疗白细胞增多症的风险和益处尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在评估白细胞分离术的疗效以及在白细胞分离术中加入细胞减少药物对降低患者白细胞计数和死亡率的影响。材料与方法回顾性分析34例行白细胞抽取术的成年急性白血病患者。结果患者中位年龄为66.5岁,88.2%为急性髓系白血病。白细胞分离总次数为69次,中位数为2次。最常见的症状与肺系统相关(67.6%)。中位随访时间为17.5天。平均白细胞计数减少69,112/mm3,白细胞分离有效率为40.9%。白细胞和血小板计数的下降与白细胞分离前后比较有统计学意义。住院期间死亡率为76.5%。24例患者同时接受了细胞减少药物和白细胞摘除术,10例患者没有。两组间白细胞计数、白细胞分离效率、死亡率差异无统计学意义(p值分别为0.857、0.562、0.553)。在我们的研究中,我们显示了白细胞分离对白细胞增多症的疗效,但没有显示额外的细胞减少药物在白细胞减少或死亡率方面有任何差异。白细胞摘除术并伴有细胞减少并不会消除或增加死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Turkish Nephrology on the 100th Anniversary of the Republic Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Followed at the Intensive Care Unit after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (Fisher Grade IV) Surgery:A Retrospective Study Adrenal Cystic Lymphangioma with Radiological, Clinical and Histopathological Findings, Case report. An Unusual Cause of Bilateral Adrenal Incidentaloma: A Case Report of Primary Adrenal Lymphoma An underestimated old friend: Serum protein electrophoresis in the differential diagnosis of glomerulopathies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1