Effects of strength training with continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction on the hypertrophy, muscular strength and endurance of men

IF 0.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES Pub Date : 2019-05-22 DOI:10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V41I1.42273
Gabriel R. Neto, Júlio C. G. Silva, Lucas Freitas, Hidayane Gonçalves da Silva Silva, Danillo Caldas, J. Novaes, Maria S Cirilo-Sousa
{"title":"Effects of strength training with continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction on the hypertrophy, muscular strength and endurance of men","authors":"Gabriel R. Neto, Júlio C. G. Silva, Lucas Freitas, Hidayane Gonçalves da Silva Silva, Danillo Caldas, J. Novaes, Maria S Cirilo-Sousa","doi":"10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V41I1.42273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of strength training (ST) with continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) on the muscle hypertrophy (MH), dynamic muscle strength (DMS), isometric muscle strength (IMS) and localized muscular endurance (LME) of healthy men. Twenty-five men with experience in ST were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups: a) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of the one-repetition maximum (1RM) combined with continuous BFR (LL+CBFR), b) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of 1RM combined with intermittent BFR (LL+IBFR); and c) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of 1RM without BFR (LL). Twelve sessions of ST were performed (twice a week for 6 weeks). There were no differences between groups for all variables (p > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in time for the LME in the triceps pulley only in the LL+CBFR group (p < 0.001) and in the biceps pulley in the groups LL+CBFR, LL+IBFR and LL (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.032), respectively, with large magnitudes only for the two forms of the BFR. It can be concluded that continuous or intermittent BFR seems to be a good alternative for the increase of the LME of the upper limbs in single-joint exercises.","PeriodicalId":42839,"journal":{"name":"ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V41I1.42273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of strength training (ST) with continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) on the muscle hypertrophy (MH), dynamic muscle strength (DMS), isometric muscle strength (IMS) and localized muscular endurance (LME) of healthy men. Twenty-five men with experience in ST were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups: a) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of the one-repetition maximum (1RM) combined with continuous BFR (LL+CBFR), b) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of 1RM combined with intermittent BFR (LL+IBFR); and c) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of 1RM without BFR (LL). Twelve sessions of ST were performed (twice a week for 6 weeks). There were no differences between groups for all variables (p > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in time for the LME in the triceps pulley only in the LL+CBFR group (p < 0.001) and in the biceps pulley in the groups LL+CBFR, LL+IBFR and LL (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.032), respectively, with large magnitudes only for the two forms of the BFR. It can be concluded that continuous or intermittent BFR seems to be a good alternative for the increase of the LME of the upper limbs in single-joint exercises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续或间歇血流量限制的力量训练对男性肥厚、肌肉力量和耐力的影响
本研究的目的是比较连续或间歇血流量限制(BFR)的力量训练(ST)对健康男性肌肉肥厚(MH)、动态肌肉力量(DMS)、等长肌肉力量(IMS)和局部肌肉耐力(LME)的影响。25名有ST训练经验的男性被随机分为3个实验组:a) 4项低负荷运动(1RM的20%)结合连续BFR (LL+CBFR), b) 4项低负荷运动(1RM的20%)结合间歇性BFR (LL+IBFR);c) 4次低负荷运动,强度为1RM的20%,无BFR (LL)。进行了12次ST(每周2次,共6周)。各组间各变量差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。然而,三头肌滑轮LME仅在LL+CBFR组(p < 0.001)以及二头肌滑轮在LL+CBFR、LL+IBFR和LL组(p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.032)的时间上存在显著差异,且仅两种形式的BFR存在较大差异。由此可见,对于单关节运动中上肢LME的增加,连续或间歇的BFR似乎是一个很好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES
ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original papers in Health Sciences, such as Clinical Analyses; Physical Education, Nursing, Pharmacy; Pharmacology, Phoniatry and Audiology, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Medicine, Nutrition, Dentistry and Public Health Policies.
期刊最新文献
Acupuncture effects on pain and health status in women with fibromyalgia: a randomized clinical trial Psychological, physical and sexual violence against brazilian women: a cross-section study Singlet oxygen release due to different concentrations of photosensitizer Adherence by nursing professionals to standard precautions in the COVID-19 pandemic Tomographic evaluation of changes induced by herbst treatment - buccolingual inclination of mandibular canines and the intercanine distance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1