Doctoral Writers’ Resiliency in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Q2 Social Sciences International Journal of Doctoral Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.28945/4956
Alice Shu-Ju Lee, William J Donohue, Shelah Y. Simpson, Kathleen Vacek
{"title":"Doctoral Writers’ Resiliency in the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Alice Shu-Ju Lee, William J Donohue, Shelah Y. Simpson, Kathleen Vacek","doi":"10.28945/4956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown required doctoral writers to demonstrate resiliency to continue their culminating projects. This study examines the socioecological factors that fostered that resiliency. Background: Resiliency is a key factor in determining whether doctoral writers continue with their culminating projects. Thus far, studies on doctoral student experiences during the pandemic have yet to investigate doctoral students’ adaptive strategies to continue with their projects. Methodology: The qualitative study uses in-depth interviews to document the narrative journeys of four research participants pre-pandemic and in-pandemic. Those narratives are analyzed using an infectious disease resilience framework as a metaphor to highlight the resilience within each participant’s writing ecology. Contribution: The study seeks to reframe the approach to doctoral writing beyond the individual student toward a broader ecological system to better serve those students and the knowledge produced, regardless of a disruptive crisis. Findings: The disruptions that the four participants experienced are documented through their narratives. The participants described their coping strategies related to their workspace, technology, loss of connection, and their breaking point. Recommendations for Practitioners: The resilience shown by the four participants demonstrates areas where institutions can provide assistance to alleviate the pressures placed on doctoral writers. Reframing the dissertation writing process as a socioecological system rather than a cognitive one allows for solutions to problems that are not limited to individual writers. Recommendation for Researchers: Extending the socioecological systems metaphor, further research should investigate other stakeholders in a writer’s ecology to obtain different perspectives on a particular system. Impact on Society: The pandemic has presented an opportunity for educational institutions to reassess how they can cultivate students’ resilience to positively impact their socioecological balance. Future Research: It would be worthwhile to document the post-pandemic experiences of doctoral writers to find out how they seek balance in their ecology as they continue to deal with the post-pandemic fallout.","PeriodicalId":53524,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","volume":"23 8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown required doctoral writers to demonstrate resiliency to continue their culminating projects. This study examines the socioecological factors that fostered that resiliency. Background: Resiliency is a key factor in determining whether doctoral writers continue with their culminating projects. Thus far, studies on doctoral student experiences during the pandemic have yet to investigate doctoral students’ adaptive strategies to continue with their projects. Methodology: The qualitative study uses in-depth interviews to document the narrative journeys of four research participants pre-pandemic and in-pandemic. Those narratives are analyzed using an infectious disease resilience framework as a metaphor to highlight the resilience within each participant’s writing ecology. Contribution: The study seeks to reframe the approach to doctoral writing beyond the individual student toward a broader ecological system to better serve those students and the knowledge produced, regardless of a disruptive crisis. Findings: The disruptions that the four participants experienced are documented through their narratives. The participants described their coping strategies related to their workspace, technology, loss of connection, and their breaking point. Recommendations for Practitioners: The resilience shown by the four participants demonstrates areas where institutions can provide assistance to alleviate the pressures placed on doctoral writers. Reframing the dissertation writing process as a socioecological system rather than a cognitive one allows for solutions to problems that are not limited to individual writers. Recommendation for Researchers: Extending the socioecological systems metaphor, further research should investigate other stakeholders in a writer’s ecology to obtain different perspectives on a particular system. Impact on Society: The pandemic has presented an opportunity for educational institutions to reassess how they can cultivate students’ resilience to positively impact their socioecological balance. Future Research: It would be worthwhile to document the post-pandemic experiences of doctoral writers to find out how they seek balance in their ecology as they continue to deal with the post-pandemic fallout.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
博士作者在COVID-19大流行中的弹性
目的/目的:2019冠状病毒病大流行和随后的封锁要求博士作者表现出弹性,以继续他们的最终项目。本研究考察了促进这种弹性的社会生态因素。背景:弹性是决定博士作者是否继续他们的最终项目的关键因素。到目前为止,关于大流行期间博士生经历的研究尚未调查博士生继续其项目的适应策略。方法:定性研究采用深入访谈的方式,记录了四名研究参与者在大流行前和大流行期间的叙述历程。这些叙述是用传染病复原力框架作为隐喻来分析的,以突出每个参与者的写作生态中的复原力。贡献:该研究旨在重塑博士写作的方法,超越个体学生,转向更广泛的生态系统,以更好地服务于这些学生和所产生的知识,而不考虑破坏性危机。发现:四位参与者经历的干扰通过他们的叙述被记录下来。参与者描述了他们的应对策略,涉及到他们的工作空间、技术、失去联系和他们的崩溃点。对从业者的建议:四位参与者展示的弹性表明,机构可以在哪些领域提供帮助,以减轻博士作者的压力。将论文写作过程重构为一个社会生态系统,而不是一个认知系统,可以解决不限于个别作家的问题。对研究人员的建议:延伸社会生态系统的隐喻,进一步的研究应该调查作家生态中的其他利益相关者,以获得对特定系统的不同观点。对社会的影响:大流行病为教育机构提供了一个机会,重新评估如何培养学生的适应能力,以积极影响他们的社会生态平衡。未来研究:记录博士作者在大流行后的经历,以了解他们在继续应对大流行后的影响时如何在自己的生态中寻求平衡,这是值得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Doctoral Studies
International Journal of Doctoral Studies Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
A Framework of Rhetorical Moves Designed to Scaffold the Research Proposal Development Process What Does It Mean To Be a Resilient Student? An Explorative Study of Doctoral Students’ Resilience and Coping Strategies Using Grounded Theory as the Analytic Lens PhD by Prospective Publication in Australian Business Schools: Provocations from a Collaborative Autoethnography Mitigating Ceiling Effects in a Longitudinal Study of Doctoral Engineering Student Stress and Persistence Into the Challenges of Aligning Key Sections of Doctoral Dissertations: Cognitive Analysis, Pedagogical Tools, and Instrument Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1