Direct Sum Theorems From Fortification

Hao Wu
{"title":"Direct Sum Theorems From Fortification","authors":"Hao Wu","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2208.07730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We revisit the direct sum questions in communication complexity which asks whether the resource needed to solve $n$ communication problems together is (approximately) the sum of resources needed to solve these problems separately. Our work starts with the observation that Dinur and Meir's fortification lemma can be generalized to a general fortification lemma for a sub-additive measure over set. By applying this lemma to the case of cover number, we obtain a dual form of cover number, called\"$\\delta$-fooling set\"which is a generalized fooling set. Any rectangle which contains enough number of elements from a $\\delta$-fooling set can not be monochromatic. With this fact, we are able to reprove the classic direct sum theorem of cover number with a simple double counting argument. Formally, let $S \\subseteq (A\\times B) \\times O$ and $T \\subseteq (P\\times Q) \\times Z$ be two communication problems, $ \\log \\mathsf{Cov}\\left(S\\times T\\right) \\geq \\log \\mathsf{Cov}\\left(S\\right) + \\log\\mathsf{Cov}(T) -\\log\\log|P||Q|-4.$ where $\\mathsf{Cov}$ denotes the cover number. One issue of current deterministic direct sum theorems about communication complexity is that they provide no information when $n$ is small, especially when $n=2$. In this work, we prove a new direct sum theorem about protocol size which imply a better direct sum theorem for two functions in terms of protocol size. Formally, let $\\mathsf{L}$ denotes complexity of the protocol size of a communication problem, given a communication problem $F:A \\times B \\rightarrow \\{0,1\\}$, $ \\log\\mathsf{L}\\left(F\\times F\\right)\\geq \\log \\mathsf{L}\\left(F\\right) +\\Omega\\left(\\sqrt{\\log\\mathsf{L}\\left(F\\right)}\\right)-\\log\\log|A||B| -4$. All our results are obtained in a similar way using the $\\delta$-fooling set to construct a hardcore for the direct sum problem.","PeriodicalId":11639,"journal":{"name":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.07730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We revisit the direct sum questions in communication complexity which asks whether the resource needed to solve $n$ communication problems together is (approximately) the sum of resources needed to solve these problems separately. Our work starts with the observation that Dinur and Meir's fortification lemma can be generalized to a general fortification lemma for a sub-additive measure over set. By applying this lemma to the case of cover number, we obtain a dual form of cover number, called"$\delta$-fooling set"which is a generalized fooling set. Any rectangle which contains enough number of elements from a $\delta$-fooling set can not be monochromatic. With this fact, we are able to reprove the classic direct sum theorem of cover number with a simple double counting argument. Formally, let $S \subseteq (A\times B) \times O$ and $T \subseteq (P\times Q) \times Z$ be two communication problems, $ \log \mathsf{Cov}\left(S\times T\right) \geq \log \mathsf{Cov}\left(S\right) + \log\mathsf{Cov}(T) -\log\log|P||Q|-4.$ where $\mathsf{Cov}$ denotes the cover number. One issue of current deterministic direct sum theorems about communication complexity is that they provide no information when $n$ is small, especially when $n=2$. In this work, we prove a new direct sum theorem about protocol size which imply a better direct sum theorem for two functions in terms of protocol size. Formally, let $\mathsf{L}$ denotes complexity of the protocol size of a communication problem, given a communication problem $F:A \times B \rightarrow \{0,1\}$, $ \log\mathsf{L}\left(F\times F\right)\geq \log \mathsf{L}\left(F\right) +\Omega\left(\sqrt{\log\mathsf{L}\left(F\right)}\right)-\log\log|A||B| -4$. All our results are obtained in a similar way using the $\delta$-fooling set to construct a hardcore for the direct sum problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接和定理
我们重新审视通信复杂性中的直接和问题,它询问一起解决$n$通信问题所需的资源是否(近似)是单独解决这些问题所需的资源总和。我们的工作从观察到Dinur和Meir的强化引理可以推广到集合上的次加性测度的一般强化引理开始。将此引理应用于覆盖数的情况,得到了覆盖数的对偶形式,称为“$\delta$ -愚弄集”,它是一种广义的愚弄集。任何包含$\delta$ -fool集合中足够数量元素的矩形都不可能是单色的。利用这一事实,我们可以用一个简单的重复计数论证来反驳经典的复数直和定理。形式上,设$S \subseteq (A\times B) \times O$和$T \subseteq (P\times Q) \times Z$为两个通信问题,$ \log \mathsf{Cov}\left(S\times T\right) \geq \log \mathsf{Cov}\left(S\right) + \log\mathsf{Cov}(T) -\log\log|P||Q|-4.$其中$\mathsf{Cov}$表示封面号。当前关于通信复杂性的确定性直接和定理的一个问题是,当$n$很小时,特别是$n=2$很小时,它们不提供任何信息。在这项工作中,我们证明了一个新的关于协议大小的直接和定理,它暗示了一个更好的关于协议大小的两个函数的直接和定理。形式上,让$\mathsf{L}$表示通信问题的协议大小的复杂性,给定通信问题$F:A \times B \rightarrow \{0,1\}$, $ \log\mathsf{L}\left(F\times F\right)\geq \log \mathsf{L}\left(F\right) +\Omega\left(\sqrt{\log\mathsf{L}\left(F\right)}\right)-\log\log|A||B| -4$。我们所有的结果都是以类似的方式获得的,使用$\delta$ -愚弄集来构建直接和问题的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dependency schemes in CDCL-based QBF solving: a proof-theoretic study On blocky ranks of matrices Fractional Linear Matroid Matching is in quasi-NC Aaronson-Ambainis Conjecture Is True For Random Restrictions Optimal Pseudorandom Generators for Low-Degree Polynomials Over Moderately Large Fields
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1