Effect of Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program on Anxiety and Depression in COVID-19 Patients

Fahimeh Hashemi, Atena Samarehfekri, Shayan Vafaei, H. Mirzaei, Niloofar Rashidipour, Mozhgan Taeby, M. Sadeghi
{"title":"Effect of Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program on Anxiety and Depression in COVID-19 Patients","authors":"Fahimeh Hashemi, Atena Samarehfekri, Shayan Vafaei, H. Mirzaei, Niloofar Rashidipour, Mozhgan Taeby, M. Sadeghi","doi":"10.5812/msnj-129612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Respiratory failure caused by pneumonia is the leading cause of death in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients; furthermore, anxiety and depression caused by this disease and its complications, as the most common psychological disorders might harm the mental health of COVID-19 patients. Objectives: This study aimed to look into the effect of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) program on anxiety and depression in COVID-19 patients (severe acute respiratory syndrome). Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 70 COVID-19 patients in Kerman, Iran, in 2021, randomly allocated into 2 equal groups of control (n = 35) and intervention (n = 35). In the control group, the patients received only routine post-discharge care, and in the intervention group, the patients received HBPR procedures based on the “Guide to Restoring Movement COVID-19 Protocol” by John Hopkins University, the United States, that teaches to patients after discharge. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to determine anxiety and depression status and scores before and after 4-week procedures. Additionally, the chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare anxiety and depression status and scores between the 2 groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The median score of anxiety (5 vs. 14, P < 0.0001) and depression (6 vs. 10, P < 0.0001), 4 weeks after discharge from the hospital in the intervention group, was significantly lower than in the control group based on the Mann-Whitney U test (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: This rehabilitation procedure is effective in the reduction of anxiety and depression in COVID-19 patients and their pulmonary status. Therefore, it can be used as a treatment procedure for mental recovery in these patients.","PeriodicalId":18480,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/msnj-129612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Respiratory failure caused by pneumonia is the leading cause of death in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients; furthermore, anxiety and depression caused by this disease and its complications, as the most common psychological disorders might harm the mental health of COVID-19 patients. Objectives: This study aimed to look into the effect of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) program on anxiety and depression in COVID-19 patients (severe acute respiratory syndrome). Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 70 COVID-19 patients in Kerman, Iran, in 2021, randomly allocated into 2 equal groups of control (n = 35) and intervention (n = 35). In the control group, the patients received only routine post-discharge care, and in the intervention group, the patients received HBPR procedures based on the “Guide to Restoring Movement COVID-19 Protocol” by John Hopkins University, the United States, that teaches to patients after discharge. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to determine anxiety and depression status and scores before and after 4-week procedures. Additionally, the chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare anxiety and depression status and scores between the 2 groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The median score of anxiety (5 vs. 14, P < 0.0001) and depression (6 vs. 10, P < 0.0001), 4 weeks after discharge from the hospital in the intervention group, was significantly lower than in the control group based on the Mann-Whitney U test (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: This rehabilitation procedure is effective in the reduction of anxiety and depression in COVID-19 patients and their pulmonary status. Therefore, it can be used as a treatment procedure for mental recovery in these patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭肺康复方案对新冠肺炎患者焦虑和抑郁的影响
背景:肺炎引起的呼吸衰竭是2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者死亡的主要原因;此外,该疾病及其并发症引起的焦虑和抑郁作为最常见的心理障碍,可能会损害COVID-19患者的心理健康。目的:本研究旨在探讨基于家庭的肺康复(HBPR)计划对COVID-19(严重急性呼吸综合征)患者焦虑和抑郁的影响。方法:选取2021年伊朗克尔曼市70例COVID-19患者进行随机临床试验,随机分为对照组(n = 35)和干预组(n = 35)。对照组患者仅接受常规出院后护理,干预组患者根据美国约翰霍普金斯大学《COVID-19恢复运动指南方案》对患者进行出院后教学的HBPR程序。采用医院焦虑抑郁量表测定4周手术前后的焦虑抑郁状态及得分。此外,使用卡方检验、Fisher’s exact检验和Mann-Whitney U检验来比较两组之间的焦虑和抑郁状况和得分。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:根据Mann-Whitney U检验,干预组患者出院后4周焦虑(5比14,P < 0.0001)和抑郁(6比10,P < 0.0001)中位数得分显著低于对照组(P < 0.0001)。结论:该康复方法可有效减轻COVID-19患者的焦虑和抑郁,改善肺部状况。因此,它可以作为一种治疗程序,在这些患者的精神恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of ACT and DBT-Based Interventions with and without Exercise on Pain Outcomes and Desire for Treatment in Substance-Dependent Patients with Chronic Pain Effect of Self-efficacy-Based Training on Treatment Adherence of Patients with Heart Failure The Effect of an Exercise Program on the Quality of Life in Burn Patients Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Hybrid Concept Analysis Effect of Mobile Health Self-Care Training on Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1