How to interpret failed proofs in Event-B

Son Hoang
{"title":"How to interpret failed proofs in Event-B","authors":"Son Hoang","doi":"10.3929/ETHZ-A-006857374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In formal reasoning, modelling and proving activities are closely related. Models give rise to different proof obligations and information about failed proofs gives indications on how models should be improved. This document is an attempt to address the latter issue: to understand how to deal with unprovable obligations. We consider here proof obligations related to invariant preservation of an Event-B model: firstly, to understand the meaning of the proof obligations; secondly, to analyse various ways to fix the model accordingly. Our analysis is based on the concept of reachable states and inductive invariants.","PeriodicalId":10841,"journal":{"name":"CTIT technical reports series","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CTIT technical reports series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-A-006857374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In formal reasoning, modelling and proving activities are closely related. Models give rise to different proof obligations and information about failed proofs gives indications on how models should be improved. This document is an attempt to address the latter issue: to understand how to deal with unprovable obligations. We consider here proof obligations related to invariant preservation of an Event-B model: firstly, to understand the meaning of the proof obligations; secondly, to analyse various ways to fix the model accordingly. Our analysis is based on the concept of reachable states and inductive invariants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何解释事件b中失败的证明
在形式推理中,建模和证明活动是密切相关的。模型产生了不同的证明义务,关于失败证明的信息表明了如何改进模型。本文件试图解决后一个问题:了解如何处理无法证明的义务。我们在此考虑与Event-B模型的不变保存相关的证明义务:首先,理解证明义务的含义;其次,分析各种修正模型的方法。我们的分析是基于可达状态和归纳不变量的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Costs and Benefits of Electric Vehicles and District Cooling Systems: A case study in Singapore Towards a Digital Urban Climate Twin: Simulation-as-a-Service (SaaS) for Model Integration Microscale Assessment of the Anthropogenic Heat Mitigation Strategies Decision Support System: User research, usability analysis and computational build Analysis of climatic variables in different urban sites of Singapore and evaluation of strategies to improve the outdoor thermal environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1