Social Risk Factors and Desire for Assistance Among Patients Receiving Subsidized Health Care Insurance in a US-Based Integrated Delivery System

L. Tuzzio, R. Wellman, E. D. De Marchis, L. Gottlieb, Callie Walsh-Bailey, Salene M. W. Jones, C. Nau, J. Steiner, M. Banegas, A. Sharp, Alphonse J Derus, C. Lewis
{"title":"Social Risk Factors and Desire for Assistance Among Patients Receiving Subsidized Health Care Insurance in a US-Based Integrated Delivery System","authors":"L. Tuzzio, R. Wellman, E. D. De Marchis, L. Gottlieb, Callie Walsh-Bailey, Salene M. W. Jones, C. Nau, J. Steiner, M. Banegas, A. Sharp, Alphonse J Derus, C. Lewis","doi":"10.1370/afm.2774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE Because social conditions such as food insecurity and housing instability shape health outcomes, health systems are increasingly screening for and addressing patients’ social risks. This study documented the prevalence of social risks and examined the desire for assistance in addressing those risks in a US-based integrated delivery system. METHODS A survey was administered to Kaiser Permanente members on subsidized exchange health insurance plans (2018-2019). The survey included questions about 4 domains of social risks, desire for help, and attitudes. We conducted a descriptive analysis and estimated multivariate modified Poisson regression models. RESULTS Of 438 participants, 212 (48%) reported at least 1 social risk factor. Housing instability was the most common (70%) factor reported. Members with social risks reported more discomfort being screened for social risks (14.2% vs 5.4%; P = .002) than those without risks, although 90% of participants believed that health systems should assist in addressing social risks. Among those with 1-2 social risks, however, only 27% desired assistance. Non-Hispanic Black participants who reported a social risk were more than twice as likely to desire assistance compared with non-Hispanic White participants (adjusted relative risk [RR] 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.8). CONCLUSIONS Athough most survey participants believed health systems have a role in addressing social risks, a minority of those reporting a risk wanted assistance and reported more discomfort being screened for risk factors than those without risks. Health systems should work to increase the comfort of patients in reporting risks, explore how to successfully assist them when desired, and offer resources to address these risks outside the health care sector. VISUAL ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":22305,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

PURPOSE Because social conditions such as food insecurity and housing instability shape health outcomes, health systems are increasingly screening for and addressing patients’ social risks. This study documented the prevalence of social risks and examined the desire for assistance in addressing those risks in a US-based integrated delivery system. METHODS A survey was administered to Kaiser Permanente members on subsidized exchange health insurance plans (2018-2019). The survey included questions about 4 domains of social risks, desire for help, and attitudes. We conducted a descriptive analysis and estimated multivariate modified Poisson regression models. RESULTS Of 438 participants, 212 (48%) reported at least 1 social risk factor. Housing instability was the most common (70%) factor reported. Members with social risks reported more discomfort being screened for social risks (14.2% vs 5.4%; P = .002) than those without risks, although 90% of participants believed that health systems should assist in addressing social risks. Among those with 1-2 social risks, however, only 27% desired assistance. Non-Hispanic Black participants who reported a social risk were more than twice as likely to desire assistance compared with non-Hispanic White participants (adjusted relative risk [RR] 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.8). CONCLUSIONS Athough most survey participants believed health systems have a role in addressing social risks, a minority of those reporting a risk wanted assistance and reported more discomfort being screened for risk factors than those without risks. Health systems should work to increase the comfort of patients in reporting risks, explore how to successfully assist them when desired, and offer resources to address these risks outside the health care sector. VISUAL ABSTRACT
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国综合输送系统中接受补贴医疗保险患者的社会风险因素和援助意愿
由于粮食不安全和住房不稳定等社会条件影响健康结果,卫生系统越来越多地筛查和解决患者的社会风险。这项研究记录了社会风险的普遍性,并审查了在美国综合交付系统中解决这些风险的援助愿望。方法对Kaiser Permanente的补贴交换健康保险计划会员(2018-2019年)进行调查。该调查包括4个领域的问题,包括社会风险、寻求帮助的愿望和态度。我们进行了描述性分析并估计了多元修正泊松回归模型。结果:在438名参与者中,212名(48%)报告了至少一种社会风险因素。住房不稳定是报告中最常见的因素(70%)。有社会风险的会员在接受社会风险筛查时更不自在(14.2%对5.4%;P = 0.002),尽管90%的参与者认为卫生系统应协助解决社会风险。而在1-2名社会风险者中,只有27%的人希望得到帮助。报告有社会风险的非西班牙裔黑人参与者比非西班牙裔白人参与者渴望帮助的可能性高出两倍多(调整相对风险[RR] 2.2;95% ci, 1.3-3.8)。结论:尽管大多数调查参与者认为卫生系统在解决社会风险方面发挥着作用,但少数报告有风险的人需要帮助,并且报告比没有风险的人进行了更多的风险因素筛查。卫生系统应努力提高患者报告风险的舒适度,探索如何在需要时成功地帮助他们,并提供资源在卫生保健部门之外解决这些风险。视觉文摘
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Disproportionate Impact of Primary Care Disruption and Telehealth Utilization During COVID-19 Optimization of Electronic Health Record Usability Continuity of Care as a Quality Metric Evaluation of Community Health Worker Intervention in San Antonio Discordance Between Clinician and Patient EHR Experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1