Executives in Politics

I. Babenko, Viktar Fedaseyeu, Song Zhang
{"title":"Executives in Politics","authors":"I. Babenko, Viktar Fedaseyeu, Song Zhang","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3075177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the involvement of corporate executives in U.S. politics over the last 40 years. First, we document that the share of business politicians in federal elected office increased from 13.3% in 1980% to 22.6% in 2018, with most of the increase occurring over the last two decades. Second, we find that business politicians enjoy an early fundraising advantage over their opponents, both because they are more likely to self-fund their campaigns and because they receive more campaign contributions from their firms. Third, the election of business politicians benefits their industries and firms, which experience positive abnormal stock returns when their executives win political office. We also show that business politicians, once elected, vote for policies that shift the balance of power toward corporate interests. Using close elections for identification, we show that this policy shift cannot be attributed solely to the changes in the underlying preferences of the electorate. Overall, our results indicate that corporate executives have become more involved in U.S. politics and that this involvement has benefited business interests and affected aggregate legislative outcomes. This paper was accepted by Gustavo Manso, finance. Funding: The authors thank the Digital Age Management Research Area at the China Europe International Business School (CEIBS) and Centre for Applied Research on International Markets, Banking, Finance and Regulation (BAFFI CAREFIN) at Bocconi University for financial support. The Area and the Center played no role in study design, data collection and analysis, or preparation of the manuscript. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4595 .","PeriodicalId":13701,"journal":{"name":"International Corporate Finance eJournal","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Corporate Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3075177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We study the involvement of corporate executives in U.S. politics over the last 40 years. First, we document that the share of business politicians in federal elected office increased from 13.3% in 1980% to 22.6% in 2018, with most of the increase occurring over the last two decades. Second, we find that business politicians enjoy an early fundraising advantage over their opponents, both because they are more likely to self-fund their campaigns and because they receive more campaign contributions from their firms. Third, the election of business politicians benefits their industries and firms, which experience positive abnormal stock returns when their executives win political office. We also show that business politicians, once elected, vote for policies that shift the balance of power toward corporate interests. Using close elections for identification, we show that this policy shift cannot be attributed solely to the changes in the underlying preferences of the electorate. Overall, our results indicate that corporate executives have become more involved in U.S. politics and that this involvement has benefited business interests and affected aggregate legislative outcomes. This paper was accepted by Gustavo Manso, finance. Funding: The authors thank the Digital Age Management Research Area at the China Europe International Business School (CEIBS) and Centre for Applied Research on International Markets, Banking, Finance and Regulation (BAFFI CAREFIN) at Bocconi University for financial support. The Area and the Center played no role in study design, data collection and analysis, or preparation of the manuscript. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4595 .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政界高管
我们研究了过去40年来企业高管对美国政治的参与。首先,我们记录了商业政治家在联邦民选公职中的比例从1980年的13.3%上升到2018年的22.6%,其中大部分增长发生在过去20年。其次,我们发现商业政治家比他们的对手享有早期筹款优势,这既是因为他们更有可能为自己的竞选活动提供资金,也是因为他们从自己的公司获得更多的竞选捐款。第三,商业政治家的选举有利于他们的行业和公司,当他们的高管赢得政治职位时,这些行业和公司会经历正的异常股票回报。我们还表明,商业政治家一旦当选,就会投票支持将权力平衡转向公司利益的政策。我们使用接近的选举来识别,表明这种政策转变不能仅仅归因于选民潜在偏好的变化。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,企业高管越来越多地参与美国政治,这种参与使商业利益受益,并影响了总体立法结果。这篇论文被金融学的Gustavo Manso接受。资助:作者感谢中欧国际工商学院(CEIBS)数字时代管理研究领域和博科尼大学国际市场、银行、金融与监管应用研究中心(BAFFI CAREFIN)的资金支持。区域和中心在研究设计、数据收集和分析或手稿准备中没有发挥任何作用。补充材料:数据文件和在线附录可在https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4595上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Supply Chain Channel of Government Credit Pass-through Two Investors, Two Trees, Two Goods The Role of Exchange Rate in Monetary Policy Rules: A Welfare-Based Re-Examination Home–Host Distance in Governance Quality, Foreign Banks’ Lending, and Emerging Host Markets’ Resilience The ESG Home Bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1