Risks and Benefits of HRT Versus ERT in Order to Separate HRT from ERT

J. Onwude
{"title":"Risks and Benefits of HRT Versus ERT in Order to Separate HRT from ERT","authors":"J. Onwude","doi":"10.53902/pwhcij.2022.02.000511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: While the benefits of Hormone Replace Therapy (HRT) and Estrogen Replace Therapy (ERT) might overlap, their risks have to be separated particularly with regard to breast cancer. The risks of HRT are mainly Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) and Breast cancer. The main risk of ERT is the incidence of strokes which can be avoided by not using an oral estrogen but an Intra-uterine contraceptive but reducing the risk of endometrial cancer in women with a womb. Methods: Studies that randomized peri-menopausal and menopausal women to either HRT or ERT versus placebo and one study that included similar women followed up prospectively for the incidence of the development of Alzheimer’s Dementia (AD). Results: The significant risks of HRT included CHD, stroke and pulmonary embolism. The risk of breast cancer only really existed after long term follow-up [(annualized incidence, 0.45% vs 0.36%; Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.28)]. The significant risks of ERT only included strokes. There was a lower risk of breast cancer in the long term [HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62–0.95; p=0.02]. Conclusions: In women with a uterus, where HRT instead of ERT is mandated, the oral progestogen of HRT can be replaced by intrauterine device loaded with a Progestogen. Similarly, the oral Estrogen of HRT and ERT can be replaced by Estrogen sources like the patch, gel or implants that bypass the liver and bypass potential problems like strokes and pulmonary embolism.","PeriodicalId":20389,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy and Women’s Health Care International Journal","volume":"305 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pregnancy and Women’s Health Care International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53902/pwhcij.2022.02.000511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: While the benefits of Hormone Replace Therapy (HRT) and Estrogen Replace Therapy (ERT) might overlap, their risks have to be separated particularly with regard to breast cancer. The risks of HRT are mainly Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) and Breast cancer. The main risk of ERT is the incidence of strokes which can be avoided by not using an oral estrogen but an Intra-uterine contraceptive but reducing the risk of endometrial cancer in women with a womb. Methods: Studies that randomized peri-menopausal and menopausal women to either HRT or ERT versus placebo and one study that included similar women followed up prospectively for the incidence of the development of Alzheimer’s Dementia (AD). Results: The significant risks of HRT included CHD, stroke and pulmonary embolism. The risk of breast cancer only really existed after long term follow-up [(annualized incidence, 0.45% vs 0.36%; Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.28)]. The significant risks of ERT only included strokes. There was a lower risk of breast cancer in the long term [HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62–0.95; p=0.02]. Conclusions: In women with a uterus, where HRT instead of ERT is mandated, the oral progestogen of HRT can be replaced by intrauterine device loaded with a Progestogen. Similarly, the oral Estrogen of HRT and ERT can be replaced by Estrogen sources like the patch, gel or implants that bypass the liver and bypass potential problems like strokes and pulmonary embolism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为了区分HRT和ERT, HRT与ERT的风险和益处
目的:虽然激素替代疗法(HRT)和雌激素替代疗法(ERT)的益处可能重叠,但它们的风险必须分开,特别是在乳腺癌方面。HRT的风险主要是冠心病和乳腺癌。ERT的主要风险是中风的发生率这可以通过不使用口服雌激素而是宫内避孕来避免但是降低了有子宫的女性患子宫内膜癌的风险。方法:将围绝经期和绝经期妇女随机分为HRT或ERT与安慰剂组,以及一项纳入类似妇女的研究,对阿尔茨海默氏痴呆(AD)的发病率进行前瞻性随访。结果:HRT的显著风险包括冠心病、脑卒中和肺栓塞。乳腺癌风险只有在长期随访后才真正存在(年化发病率,0.45% vs 0.36%;风险比(HR) 1.28)。ERT的显著风险仅包括中风。从长期来看,患乳腺癌的风险较低[HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.95;p = 0.02)。结论:在有子宫的妇女中,HRT代替ERT是强制性的,HRT的口服孕激素可以被加载孕激素的宫内节育器取代。同样,HRT和ERT的口服雌激素可以被雌激素来源替代,如贴片、凝胶或植入物,绕过肝脏,绕过中风和肺栓塞等潜在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reproductive Care in Community Health Centers: A Multi-Method Evaluation of Illinois Contraceptive Access Now demonstration Assessment of Obstetric Outcomes for New Mainers Recreating the Village: The Patient Experience with Group Perinatal Care Making Decisions about Cannabis Use during Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study Results from the Breastfeeding/Lactation Support for Medical Trainees Policy Implementation Learning Collaborative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1