Scientific production of Nutrition courses in Food and Nutrition in Collective Health: contributions to the debate on professional performance

IF 0.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES Pub Date : 2021-10-13 DOI:10.4025/actascihealthsci.v43i1.53939
Taiana Brito Menêzes Flor, L. Noro
{"title":"Scientific production of Nutrition courses in Food and Nutrition in Collective Health: contributions to the debate on professional performance","authors":"Taiana Brito Menêzes Flor, L. Noro","doi":"10.4025/actascihealthsci.v43i1.53939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the scientific production of Nutrition courses on knowledge core Food and Nutrition in Collective Health (FNCH) and its associations with institutional characteristics and advisor’s academic degree. A bibliometric study was performed on 195 final projects of five nutrition courses in Rio Grande do Norte state (Brazil) from the year 2013. Information related to higher education institutions and academic degree of advisor were collected. From the reading of sections of final projects, screening was performed on final project involvement with knowledge core FNCH, being collected general methodological characteristics, classification on sub cores of FNCH, and theme approached. Pearson’s chi-square test was used with a significance level at p-value ≤ 0.05 and 95% confidence interval in a univariate and bivariate way. From the total of analyzed final projects, 54 (27.7%) were related to knowledge core FNCH, prevailing final projects with a quantitative approach (61%), presented as scientific articles (57%), and performed in public services (45%). There was an emphasis on the sub-core of Nutritional Epidemiology (63%) [p < 0.001], with the theme Nutritional Assessment (57%) [p < 0.001]. There was no significant association between FNCH final projects proportion and institutional characteristics or advisor’s academic degree. Thinking about nutritionists’ practice, limitations were identified on FNCH scientific production, with an emphasis on nutritional diagnosis researches, with less involvement in public health policies and human and social sciences.","PeriodicalId":42839,"journal":{"name":"ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihealthsci.v43i1.53939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the scientific production of Nutrition courses on knowledge core Food and Nutrition in Collective Health (FNCH) and its associations with institutional characteristics and advisor’s academic degree. A bibliometric study was performed on 195 final projects of five nutrition courses in Rio Grande do Norte state (Brazil) from the year 2013. Information related to higher education institutions and academic degree of advisor were collected. From the reading of sections of final projects, screening was performed on final project involvement with knowledge core FNCH, being collected general methodological characteristics, classification on sub cores of FNCH, and theme approached. Pearson’s chi-square test was used with a significance level at p-value ≤ 0.05 and 95% confidence interval in a univariate and bivariate way. From the total of analyzed final projects, 54 (27.7%) were related to knowledge core FNCH, prevailing final projects with a quantitative approach (61%), presented as scientific articles (57%), and performed in public services (45%). There was an emphasis on the sub-core of Nutritional Epidemiology (63%) [p < 0.001], with the theme Nutritional Assessment (57%) [p < 0.001]. There was no significant association between FNCH final projects proportion and institutional characteristics or advisor’s academic degree. Thinking about nutritionists’ practice, limitations were identified on FNCH scientific production, with an emphasis on nutritional diagnosis researches, with less involvement in public health policies and human and social sciences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《集体健康中的食品和营养》营养课程的科学制作:对专业表现辩论的贡献
本研究旨在分析以“集体健康中的食物与营养”(Food and Nutrition in Collective Health, FNCH)为核心知识的营养课程的科学生产及其与院校特色和指导教师学历的关系。对2013年以来巴西北里奥格兰德州5门营养学课程的195个期末项目进行了文献计量学研究。收集了导师的高等教育机构和学位等相关信息。通过对期末项目章节的阅读,对期末项目涉及知识核心FNCH进行筛选,收集总体方法学特征,对FNCH子核心进行分类,对主题进行探讨。采用单因素和双因素的皮尔逊卡方检验,p值≤0.05显著性水平,95%置信区间。从分析的期末项目总数中,54个(27.7%)与知识核心FNCH相关,流行的期末项目采用定量方法(61%),作为科学文章(57%),并在公共服务中执行(45%)。重点是营养流行病学(63%)[p < 0.001],主题是营养评估(57%)[p < 0.001]。FNCH期末项目比例与院校特征、导师学历无显著相关。考虑到营养学家的实践,确定了FNCH科学生产的局限性,重点是营养诊断研究,较少参与公共卫生政策以及人文和社会科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES
ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original papers in Health Sciences, such as Clinical Analyses; Physical Education, Nursing, Pharmacy; Pharmacology, Phoniatry and Audiology, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Medicine, Nutrition, Dentistry and Public Health Policies.
期刊最新文献
Acupuncture effects on pain and health status in women with fibromyalgia: a randomized clinical trial Psychological, physical and sexual violence against brazilian women: a cross-section study Singlet oxygen release due to different concentrations of photosensitizer Adherence by nursing professionals to standard precautions in the COVID-19 pandemic Tomographic evaluation of changes induced by herbst treatment - buccolingual inclination of mandibular canines and the intercanine distance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1