Cash or Debit Cards? Payment Acceptance Costs for Merchants

IF 2.9 4区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review Pub Date : 2021-08-05 DOI:10.18651/er/v106n3hayashi
Fumiko Hayashi
{"title":"Cash or Debit Cards? Payment Acceptance Costs for Merchants","authors":"Fumiko Hayashi","doi":"10.18651/er/v106n3hayashi","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"5 Fumiko Hayashi is a research and policy advisor at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. This article is on the bank’s website at www.KansasCityFed.org Over the last two decades, public authorities around the world have intervened in the payment card industry to address growing interchange fees charged to merchants for processing card transactions. The goal of these interventions has been to give merchants and their customers some relief from high fees, which are typically set by the card network (such as Visa or Mastercard) and received by the card issuer (such as a bank). The Reserve Bank of Australia, for example, started regulating interchange fees for credit cards in 2003 and debit cards in 2006. After a series of agreements between the European Commission and Visa and Mastercard reduced interchange fees during the 2000s, European Union legislators approved the European Commission’s proposal to cap interchange fees for credit and debit cards in 2015. In the United States, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System implemented a cap on interchange fees for debit cards issued by large banks in 2011 (though credit card interchange fees have not been regulated). Despite this regulation, some U.S. merchants still consider debit card interchange fees too high. Interchange fees impose costs on merchants, but this does not necessarily mean accepting cards is more costly than accepting cash. Cash transactions impose costs as well: merchants may pay bank fees to","PeriodicalId":51713,"journal":{"name":"Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18651/er/v106n3hayashi","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

5 Fumiko Hayashi is a research and policy advisor at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. This article is on the bank’s website at www.KansasCityFed.org Over the last two decades, public authorities around the world have intervened in the payment card industry to address growing interchange fees charged to merchants for processing card transactions. The goal of these interventions has been to give merchants and their customers some relief from high fees, which are typically set by the card network (such as Visa or Mastercard) and received by the card issuer (such as a bank). The Reserve Bank of Australia, for example, started regulating interchange fees for credit cards in 2003 and debit cards in 2006. After a series of agreements between the European Commission and Visa and Mastercard reduced interchange fees during the 2000s, European Union legislators approved the European Commission’s proposal to cap interchange fees for credit and debit cards in 2015. In the United States, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System implemented a cap on interchange fees for debit cards issued by large banks in 2011 (though credit card interchange fees have not been regulated). Despite this regulation, some U.S. merchants still consider debit card interchange fees too high. Interchange fees impose costs on merchants, but this does not necessarily mean accepting cards is more costly than accepting cash. Cash transactions impose costs as well: merchants may pay bank fees to
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现金还是借记卡?商户的付款接受成本
林文子(Fumiko Hayashi)是堪萨斯城联邦储备银行的研究和政策顾问。在过去的二十年里,世界各地的公共机构都对支付卡行业进行了干预,以解决向处理卡交易的商家收取的日益增长的交换费问题。这些干预措施的目的是让商家和他们的客户从高昂的费用中解脱出来,这些费用通常是由信用卡网络(如Visa或万事达)设定的,由发卡机构(如银行)收取。例如,澳大利亚储备银行(Reserve Bank of Australia)从2003年开始监管信用卡交易费,从2006年开始监管借记卡交易费。在欧盟委员会与Visa和万事达达成一系列协议后,在2000年代降低了交换费,欧盟立法者于2015年批准了欧盟委员会对信用卡和借记卡交换费设定上限的提议。在美国,联邦储备系统理事会于2011年对大型银行发行的借记卡的交易费用实施了上限(尽管信用卡交易费用尚未受到监管)。尽管有这样的规定,一些美国商家仍然认为借记卡交换费太高。交易费给商家带来了成本,但这并不一定意味着接受银行卡比接受现金成本更高。现金交易也有成本:商家可能要向银行支付手续费
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction to "The Future of New York City: Charting an Equitable Recovery for All" The Promises and Perils of Racial Equity Planning Flexibility and Conversions in New York City's Housing Stock: Building for an Era of Rapid Change COVID and Cities, Thus Far Do Immigration Restrictions Affect Job Vacancies? Evidence from Online Job Postings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1