An Analytical Study on the Determination of the Lowest Improvement Depth of Deep Mixing Method

IF 0.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.12814/JKGSS.2020.19.1.035
Choonsik Park, Ji-won Song
{"title":"An Analytical Study on the Determination of the Lowest Improvement Depth of Deep Mixing Method","authors":"Choonsik Park, Ji-won Song","doi":"10.12814/JKGSS.2020.19.1.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design techniques for the deep mixing method, one of the soft ground improvement methods, include two ways to interpret the ground as composite ground and pile ground. However, since comparative studies on these two approaches are insufficient, it is difficult to clearly define the analysis criteria in the design. In this study, two-dimensional and three-dimensional analyses have been performed with different conditions. The three conditions, the embankment height, depth of soft ground, and replacement ratio of reinforcement zones were varied and the analysis was performed on the basis of the assumption of composite ground and pile ground for each condition. As a result, the minimum depth of improvement in the twodimensional analysis was deeper by 6.85∼9.08% than in the three-dimensional analysis. The pile ground analysis showed that the depth of improvement was deeper by 12.22∼ 14.45% than the composite ground analysis. Based on these results, it is concluded that for more accurate design, three-dimensional analysis should be performed rather than two-dimensional analysis. also, it is judged that necessary to analyze the ground as composite ground for economical design, and as the pile ground analysis for stable design.","PeriodicalId":42164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society","volume":"33 1","pages":"35-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12814/JKGSS.2020.19.1.035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design techniques for the deep mixing method, one of the soft ground improvement methods, include two ways to interpret the ground as composite ground and pile ground. However, since comparative studies on these two approaches are insufficient, it is difficult to clearly define the analysis criteria in the design. In this study, two-dimensional and three-dimensional analyses have been performed with different conditions. The three conditions, the embankment height, depth of soft ground, and replacement ratio of reinforcement zones were varied and the analysis was performed on the basis of the assumption of composite ground and pile ground for each condition. As a result, the minimum depth of improvement in the twodimensional analysis was deeper by 6.85∼9.08% than in the three-dimensional analysis. The pile ground analysis showed that the depth of improvement was deeper by 12.22∼ 14.45% than the composite ground analysis. Based on these results, it is concluded that for more accurate design, three-dimensional analysis should be performed rather than two-dimensional analysis. also, it is judged that necessary to analyze the ground as composite ground for economical design, and as the pile ground analysis for stable design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深层搅拌法最低改进深度确定的分析研究
深层搅拌法是软土地基加固方法之一,其设计技术包括复合地基和桩基两种解释方法。然而,由于对这两种方法的比较研究不足,在设计中很难明确界定分析标准。在本研究中,在不同条件下进行了二维和三维分析。在不同路堤高度、软基深度、配筋区置换率3种情况下,分别假设复合地基和桩基础进行分析。结果,二维分析的最小改善深度比三维分析深6.85 ~ 9.08%。桩基分析结果表明,改善深度比复合地基分析深12.22 ~ 14.45%。基于这些结果,得出结论,为了更精确的设计,应该进行三维分析而不是二维分析。同时认为,为了经济设计,有必要将地基作为复合地基进行分析,为了稳定设计,有必要将地基作为桩基础进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Field Applicability of Slope of Improved Soil for Ground Stabilizer Analysis of the Correlation between the velocity speed of High-Speed Railways and the Suppressing Effect of lateral Displacement of retaining wall according to the Arrangement of Stabilizing Piles Behavioral Characteristics and Safety Management Plan for Fill Dam During Water Level Fluctuation Using Numerical Analysis Application of Laboratory Pressurized Vane Shear Test and Discrete Element Method for Determination of Foam-conditioned Soil Properties Development and Reliability Verification of Quality Control System for Compaction Grouting Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1