Evaluation of strategic management using SWOT-FAHP approaches in forest roads management

Hakan Can, K. Enez, Ender Buğday
{"title":"Evaluation of strategic management using SWOT-FAHP approaches in forest roads management","authors":"Hakan Can, K. Enez, Ender Buğday","doi":"10.2989/20702620.2022.2149364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most significant steps in the management of forests is to identify the management strategies of existing forest roads, which are basic infrastructure facilities. In the present study, managerial strategies were put forward by evaluating the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of forest road management. To create a strategy in forest road management, sub-factors were identified for the SWOT analysis and five strategy criteria were developed by using expert opinions obtained through questionnaires. As SWOT analysis is a qualitative analysis and decision-making method, the strategy criteria were then modelled using the Buckley and Chang approaches, both of which are widely used in the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP), to quantify the factors used to reach an analytical result in determining the effects and significance levels of the factors. A total of five strategy criteria along with 22 sub-factors that were prepared for SWOT analysis were modelled by making 170 pairwise comparisons and quantifying them with FAHP. The most significant factor identified, which was among the opportunity factors according to both approaches, was ‘Assisting in controlling forest fires’. According to the Buckley and Chang approaches, it was identified that the strategy that had the highest significance was ‘Protecting forest/forest resources, and improving physical infrastructure’. It was found that the sub-factor group that had the highest degree of significance was ‘weaknesses’, while the lowest sub-factor group was the ‘opportunity’ factor. The study concluded that modelling qualitative analyses in the decision-making process after quantification results in more rational solutions because it allows a comparison of the factors.","PeriodicalId":21939,"journal":{"name":"Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science","volume":"43 1","pages":"283 - 297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2022.2149364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most significant steps in the management of forests is to identify the management strategies of existing forest roads, which are basic infrastructure facilities. In the present study, managerial strategies were put forward by evaluating the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of forest road management. To create a strategy in forest road management, sub-factors were identified for the SWOT analysis and five strategy criteria were developed by using expert opinions obtained through questionnaires. As SWOT analysis is a qualitative analysis and decision-making method, the strategy criteria were then modelled using the Buckley and Chang approaches, both of which are widely used in the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP), to quantify the factors used to reach an analytical result in determining the effects and significance levels of the factors. A total of five strategy criteria along with 22 sub-factors that were prepared for SWOT analysis were modelled by making 170 pairwise comparisons and quantifying them with FAHP. The most significant factor identified, which was among the opportunity factors according to both approaches, was ‘Assisting in controlling forest fires’. According to the Buckley and Chang approaches, it was identified that the strategy that had the highest significance was ‘Protecting forest/forest resources, and improving physical infrastructure’. It was found that the sub-factor group that had the highest degree of significance was ‘weaknesses’, while the lowest sub-factor group was the ‘opportunity’ factor. The study concluded that modelling qualitative analyses in the decision-making process after quantification results in more rational solutions because it allows a comparison of the factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用SWOT-FAHP方法评价森林道路管理中的战略管理
森林管理的最重要步骤是确定作为基本基础设施的现有森林道路的管理战略。本研究通过评价森林公路经营的优势、劣势、机遇和威胁,提出了经营策略。通过问卷调查获得专家意见,确定子因素进行SWOT分析,制定五条战略准则,制定森林道路经营战略。由于SWOT分析是一种定性分析和决策方法,因此使用模糊层次分析法(FAHP)中广泛使用的Buckley和Chang方法对战略准则进行建模,以量化用于确定因素影响和显著性水平的分析结果的因素。通过170对比较和FAHP量化,共建立了五个战略标准以及为SWOT分析准备的22个子因素。根据两种方法,确定的最重要因素是“协助控制森林火灾”,这也是机会因素之一。根据Buckley和Chang的方法,确定了具有最高意义的战略是“保护森林/森林资源,改善物理基础设施”。结果发现,显著性程度最高的子因子组为“弱点”因子,显著性程度最低的子因子组为“机会”因子。该研究的结论是,在量化之后的决策过程中,建模定性分析导致更合理的解决方案,因为它允许对因素进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in anatomical characteristics of Falcataria moluccana wood due to Uromycladium tepperianum infection Changes in protein expression in Acacia mearnsii De Wild (black wattle) as a result of exposure to frost-inducing temperatures Evidence-based global yield benchmarks in unthinned industrial plantation eucalypts Biomass production and nutritional efficiency in short rotation eucalypt clone plantations for energy in north-east Brazil Growth and adaptability of provenances and progenies of Pinus maximinoi H.E.Moore in northern Mozambique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1