Effect of low molecular weight heparin on bleeding after radical gastrectomy: A retrospective study from a high-volume center in China

Peng Zhou , Yan Hu , Peili Jin , Jinxin Zheng , Fenglin Liu , Zhenbin Shen , Weidong Chen , Kuntang Shen , Zhaoqing Tang , Yihong Sun , Xuefei Wang
{"title":"Effect of low molecular weight heparin on bleeding after radical gastrectomy: A retrospective study from a high-volume center in China","authors":"Peng Zhou ,&nbsp;Yan Hu ,&nbsp;Peili Jin ,&nbsp;Jinxin Zheng ,&nbsp;Fenglin Liu ,&nbsp;Zhenbin Shen ,&nbsp;Weidong Chen ,&nbsp;Kuntang Shen ,&nbsp;Zhaoqing Tang ,&nbsp;Yihong Sun ,&nbsp;Xuefei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2022.100003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with gastric cancer, it's difficult for surgeons to choose appropriate time to start anti-coagulation because of the risk of surgical field bleeding after radical gastrectomy. We compared the risk of VTE and bleeding between patients receiving LMWH within and beyond 48 ​h after surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The medical records of consecutive cases receiving radical gastrectomy from November 1st, 2017 to October 31st, 2018 in Zhongshan Hospital Gastric Cancer Center were carefully reviewed. Patients receiving LMWH within and beyond 48 ​h after surgery were regarded as Early Group (EG) and Delayed Group (DG), respectively. Incidence of VTE and bleeding complications were compared and risk factors of bleeding were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six hundred and sixty-five cases were enrolled, including 465 in EG and 200 in DG. No significant differences of clinicopathological or operative features were observed except for fewer combined resection (DG: 5.0%, EG: 1.9%, P ​= ​0.030) and shorter surgery duration (DG: 194min, EG: 168min, P ​&lt; ​0.001). No patients suffered from deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in our study. However, postoperative bleeding rate was higher in EG (DG: 1.5%, EG: 7.5%, P ​= ​0.002). Multivariate analysis suggested that EG was the independent risk factor of bleeding (OR: 3.744, 1.13–12.36, P ​= ​0.030).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Use of LMWH 48 ​h after radical gastrectomy maybe a good choice for clinical surgeons to reduce postoperative bleeding rate without increasing VTE risk in gastric cancer patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"1 1","pages":"Article 100003"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X22000034/pdfft?md5=645f69d4f1cb432cec6ca807494e5ab3&pid=1-s2.0-S2773160X22000034-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X22000034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with gastric cancer, it's difficult for surgeons to choose appropriate time to start anti-coagulation because of the risk of surgical field bleeding after radical gastrectomy. We compared the risk of VTE and bleeding between patients receiving LMWH within and beyond 48 ​h after surgery.

Methods

The medical records of consecutive cases receiving radical gastrectomy from November 1st, 2017 to October 31st, 2018 in Zhongshan Hospital Gastric Cancer Center were carefully reviewed. Patients receiving LMWH within and beyond 48 ​h after surgery were regarded as Early Group (EG) and Delayed Group (DG), respectively. Incidence of VTE and bleeding complications were compared and risk factors of bleeding were evaluated.

Results

Six hundred and sixty-five cases were enrolled, including 465 in EG and 200 in DG. No significant differences of clinicopathological or operative features were observed except for fewer combined resection (DG: 5.0%, EG: 1.9%, P ​= ​0.030) and shorter surgery duration (DG: 194min, EG: 168min, P ​< ​0.001). No patients suffered from deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in our study. However, postoperative bleeding rate was higher in EG (DG: 1.5%, EG: 7.5%, P ​= ​0.002). Multivariate analysis suggested that EG was the independent risk factor of bleeding (OR: 3.744, 1.13–12.36, P ​= ​0.030).

Conclusion

Use of LMWH 48 ​h after radical gastrectomy maybe a good choice for clinical surgeons to reduce postoperative bleeding rate without increasing VTE risk in gastric cancer patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低分子肝素对根治性胃切除术后出血的影响:来自中国一个大容量中心的回顾性研究
背景虽然低分子肝素(LMWH)被推荐用于预防胃癌患者静脉血栓栓塞(VTE),但由于胃癌根治术后手术野出血的风险,外科医生很难选择合适的时间开始抗凝治疗。我们比较了术后48小时内和48小时后接受低分子肝素治疗的患者发生静脉血栓栓塞和出血的风险。方法回顾中山医院胃癌中心2017年11月1日至2018年10月31日连续行根治性胃切除术病例的病历。术后48 h内和48 h后接受低分子肝素治疗的患者分别称为早期组(EG)和延迟组(DG)。比较静脉血栓栓塞和出血并发症的发生率,并评价出血的危险因素。结果共纳入665例,其中EG组465例,DG组200例。除联合切除较少(DG: 5.0%, EG: 1.9%, P = 0.030)和手术时间较短(DG: 194min, EG: 168min, P <0.001)。在我们的研究中,没有患者发生深静脉血栓或肺栓塞。而EG组术后出血率较高(DG: 1.5%, EG: 7.5%, P = 0.002)。多因素分析提示EG是出血的独立危险因素(OR: 3.744, 1.13-12.36, P = 0.030)。结论胃癌根治术后48 h应用低分子肝素可降低胃癌患者术后出血率,且不增加静脉血栓栓塞风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global disparities in surgical oncology: Bridging the gap in cancer care a challenge to overcome Correlation of weight and volume of modified radical mastectomy specimen with ptosis of breast in patients of breast cancer First successful laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in Bangladesh: Surgical procedure and operation outcome Surgical frontiers in metastatic disease: Shaping cancer care Individualized surgical approach based on Bismuth-Corlette classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1