Stroke Is Associated with Refractory Hypertension among Resistant and Refractory Patients in a Cross-Sectional Study

Guilherme de Andrade Costa, J. Oliveira, Luana Ferreira-Campos, A. Improta-Caria, C. Macedo, Marcelo Vincenzo Sarno, Leonardo Silva Roever Borges, Roque Aras Júnior
{"title":"Stroke Is Associated with Refractory Hypertension among Resistant and Refractory Patients in a Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Guilherme de Andrade Costa, J. Oliveira, Luana Ferreira-Campos, A. Improta-Caria, C. Macedo, Marcelo Vincenzo Sarno, Leonardo Silva Roever Borges, Roque Aras Júnior","doi":"10.36660/ijcs.20220175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Refractory hypertension (RfH) is a severe phenotype of resistant hypertension (RH) linked to higher risk of stroke and other adverse cardiovascular events, but knowledge about it is still lacking. Objectives: To evaluate the association between RfH and stroke. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a referral clinic for patients with severe hypertension in the period from 2018 to 2020. RH was defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) despite the use of 3 antihypertensive agents, including a diuretic, or the use of ≥ 4 agents regardless of BP control. RfH was defined as lack of BP control despite use of ≥ 5 antihypertensive agents. Individuals were classified as RfH or RH, and multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to examine the association between RfH and stroke. Results: We evaluated a total of 137 patients; 81% were female, and 93,3% were Black or multiracial. The mean age was 64.4 years. Stroke was more prevalent in the RfH group (35.7%), in comparison to the RH group (12.8%) (p value = 0.01). Unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for factors associated with stroke were RfH (OR 3.77; 95% CI 1.45 to 9.80), systolic BP (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.002 to 1.04) and diastolic BP (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.001 to 1.06). Adjusted OR for factors associated with stroke were RfH (OR 3.55; 95% CI 1.02 to 12.42), systolic BP (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.05) and diastolic BP (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.06). Conclusion: RfH was associated with higher prevalence of stroke. Efforts are required to better understand this association to prevent adverse cardiovascular outcomes in these patients.","PeriodicalId":32690,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/ijcs.20220175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Refractory hypertension (RfH) is a severe phenotype of resistant hypertension (RH) linked to higher risk of stroke and other adverse cardiovascular events, but knowledge about it is still lacking. Objectives: To evaluate the association between RfH and stroke. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a referral clinic for patients with severe hypertension in the period from 2018 to 2020. RH was defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) despite the use of 3 antihypertensive agents, including a diuretic, or the use of ≥ 4 agents regardless of BP control. RfH was defined as lack of BP control despite use of ≥ 5 antihypertensive agents. Individuals were classified as RfH or RH, and multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to examine the association between RfH and stroke. Results: We evaluated a total of 137 patients; 81% were female, and 93,3% were Black or multiracial. The mean age was 64.4 years. Stroke was more prevalent in the RfH group (35.7%), in comparison to the RH group (12.8%) (p value = 0.01). Unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for factors associated with stroke were RfH (OR 3.77; 95% CI 1.45 to 9.80), systolic BP (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.002 to 1.04) and diastolic BP (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.001 to 1.06). Adjusted OR for factors associated with stroke were RfH (OR 3.55; 95% CI 1.02 to 12.42), systolic BP (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.05) and diastolic BP (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.06). Conclusion: RfH was associated with higher prevalence of stroke. Efforts are required to better understand this association to prevent adverse cardiovascular outcomes in these patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一项横断面研究中,卒中与顽固性高血压在顽固性和顽固性患者中相关
背景:难治性高血压(RfH)是顽固性高血压(RH)的一种严重表型,与卒中和其他不良心血管事件的高风险相关,但对其的认识仍然缺乏。目的:评价RfH与脑卒中的关系。方法:我们在一家转诊诊所对2018 - 2020年期间的重度高血压患者进行了横断面研究。RH被定义为:尽管使用了3种降压药,包括一种利尿剂,但血压(BP)仍未控制,或使用了≥4种降压药,无论血压是否得到控制。RfH定义为尽管使用了≥5种降压药,但血压仍未得到控制。将个体分为RfH或RH,并构建多变量logistic回归模型来检验RfH与卒中之间的关系。结果:我们共评估了137例患者;81%为女性,93%为黑人或多种族。平均年龄64.4岁。与RH组(12.8%)相比,RfH组(35.7%)卒中发生率更高(p值= 0.01)。卒中相关因素的未调整优势比(OR)和95%可信区间(CI)为RfH (OR 3.77;95% CI 1.45 ~ 9.80),收缩压(OR 1.02;95% CI 1.002 ~ 1.04)和舒张压(OR 1.03;95% CI 1.001 ~ 1.06)。卒中相关因素的调整OR为RfH (OR 3.55;95% CI 1.02 ~ 12.42),收缩压(OR 1.02;95% CI 0.99 ~ 1.05)和舒张压(OR 1.01;95% CI 0.96 ~ 1.06)。结论:RfH与卒中发生率增高有关。需要努力更好地了解这种关联,以预防这些患者的不良心血管结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Quality of Life in Patients After Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction The Relationship between Basal Serum Lipoprotein(a) Levels and the Pulmonary Artery to Ascending Aorta Ratio in COVID-19 Survivors Religiosity and Spirituality: The Relationship Between Psychosocial Factors and Cardiovascular Health High Cardiorespiratory Optimal Point Values Are Related to Cardiovascular Mortality in Men Aged 46 to 70 Years: a Prospective Cohort Study Association of Dietary Inflammatory Potential in Metabolically Healthy and Metabolically Unhealthy Obese Individuals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1