Measuring Traffic Congestion with Novel Metrics: A Case Study of Six U.S. Metropolitan Areas

J. Seong, Yun-Seok Kim, Hyewon Goh, Hyunmin Kim, A. Stanescu
{"title":"Measuring Traffic Congestion with Novel Metrics: A Case Study of Six U.S. Metropolitan Areas","authors":"J. Seong, Yun-Seok Kim, Hyewon Goh, Hyunmin Kim, A. Stanescu","doi":"10.3390/ijgi12030130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantifying traffic congestion is a critical task for transportation planning and research. Numerous metrics have been developed, mainly focusing on changes in vehicle speeds, their extents, and travel time. In this study, new metrics are presented using the Hägerstrand’s space-time cube that has been studied from time geography perspectives since the 1960s. Particularly, the product of distance and time, i.e., distanceTime, is proposed as a base metric to measure traffic congestion amounts. Using the base metric such as mileHours, metrics of weighted congestion and normalized congestion amounts were also developed. New metrics were applied to six metropolitan areas and their vicinities in the United States (Atlanta, Chicago, Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, Dallas and Fort Worth, Los Angeles, and New York), and congestion amounts were calculated and compared. The Google Traffic Layer API was used to obtain traffic congestion datasets for six months (April–September 2022), and GIS (geographic information systems) was used for delineating road features and traffic intensity levels. Among the six areas, New York and its vicinity showed the largest congestion when only heavy congestion was used. Los Angeles and its vicinity showed the largest congestion when all congestion levels were considered. This study shows that the proposed metrics are very effective in summarizing traffic amounts and broadly applicable for further analyses of traffic congestion phenomena by associating various other factors, such as weekdays, months, or gas prices. The new metrics developed in this research may help transportation researchers and practitioners by providing them with a set of metrics applicable to summarizing congestion amounts by synthesizing congestion intensity, extent, and duration.","PeriodicalId":14614,"journal":{"name":"ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf.","volume":"3 9 1","pages":"130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12030130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Quantifying traffic congestion is a critical task for transportation planning and research. Numerous metrics have been developed, mainly focusing on changes in vehicle speeds, their extents, and travel time. In this study, new metrics are presented using the Hägerstrand’s space-time cube that has been studied from time geography perspectives since the 1960s. Particularly, the product of distance and time, i.e., distanceTime, is proposed as a base metric to measure traffic congestion amounts. Using the base metric such as mileHours, metrics of weighted congestion and normalized congestion amounts were also developed. New metrics were applied to six metropolitan areas and their vicinities in the United States (Atlanta, Chicago, Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, Dallas and Fort Worth, Los Angeles, and New York), and congestion amounts were calculated and compared. The Google Traffic Layer API was used to obtain traffic congestion datasets for six months (April–September 2022), and GIS (geographic information systems) was used for delineating road features and traffic intensity levels. Among the six areas, New York and its vicinity showed the largest congestion when only heavy congestion was used. Los Angeles and its vicinity showed the largest congestion when all congestion levels were considered. This study shows that the proposed metrics are very effective in summarizing traffic amounts and broadly applicable for further analyses of traffic congestion phenomena by associating various other factors, such as weekdays, months, or gas prices. The new metrics developed in this research may help transportation researchers and practitioners by providing them with a set of metrics applicable to summarizing congestion amounts by synthesizing congestion intensity, extent, and duration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用新指标衡量交通拥堵:以美国六个大都市区为例
量化交通拥堵是交通规划与研究的重要课题。已经开发了许多度量标准,主要集中在车辆速度、范围和行驶时间的变化上。在这项研究中,使用Hägerstrand时空立方体提出了新的指标,该立方体自20世纪60年代以来一直从时间地理学的角度进行研究。特别是,距离和时间的乘积,即distanceTime,被提议作为衡量交通拥堵量的基本度量。使用基本度量(如英里小时),还开发了加权拥塞和规范化拥塞量的度量。新指标应用于美国六个大都市区及其周边地区(亚特兰大、芝加哥、华盛顿特区和巴尔的摩、达拉斯和沃斯堡、洛杉矶和纽约),并计算和比较了拥堵量。使用Google Traffic Layer API获取6个月(2022年4月至9月)的交通拥堵数据集,并使用GIS(地理信息系统)划定道路特征和交通强度等级。在6个地区中,仅使用重度拥堵时,纽约及其周边地区的拥堵程度最大。考虑到所有的拥堵程度,洛杉矶及其周边地区的拥堵程度是最严重的。这项研究表明,建议的指标在总结交通流量方面非常有效,并广泛适用于通过将各种其他因素(如工作日、月份或汽油价格)联系起来进一步分析交通拥堵现象。本研究开发的新指标可以为交通研究人员和从业人员提供一套适用于通过综合拥堵强度、程度和持续时间来总结拥堵量的指标,从而为他们提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vertical vs. Horizontal Fractal Dimensions of Roads in Relation to Relief Characteristics A Head/Tail Breaks-Based Approach to Characterizing Space-Time Risks of COVID-19 Epidemic in China's Cities Mapping Gross Domestic Product Distribution at 1 km Resolution across Thailand Using the Random Forest Area-to-Area Regression Kriging Model Effects of Spatial Reference Frames, Map Dimensionality, and Navigation Modes on Spatial Orientation Efficiency Efficient Construction of Voxel Models for Ore Bodies Using an Improved Winding Number Algorithm and CUDA Parallel Computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1