SCULPTURE PARKS OF THE XX CENTURY LAST THIRD – THE XXI CENTURY BEGINNING: TYPOLOGY EXPERIENCE

I. Steklova, Olesya I. Raguzhina
{"title":"SCULPTURE PARKS OF THE XX CENTURY LAST THIRD – THE XXI CENTURY BEGINNING: TYPOLOGY EXPERIENCE","authors":"I. Steklova, Olesya I. Raguzhina","doi":"10.17223/22220836/41/7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to present sculpture parks at the modern stage of development, from the last third of the 20th century to our day. The relevance of this purpose is due to the relevance of these parks, which meets, firstly, on the challenges of culture, reproducing itself in the synthesis of landscape and monumental-decorative arts; secondly, on the demands of the population in artistically interpreted natural spaces; thirdly, on the life-building claims of modern art, which is looking for optimal ways of self-presentation. The representation of the sculpture parks is implied their systematization, which, in the course of the factual and visual material analysis, exhibits the most typical trends of formal and informative diversity and takes the form of a typology. To start building a typology, it was necessary to draw up a rather broad and spacious representative sample of objects and to select reference criteria in the trends of the manifold. Thus, a representative sample was made up of 90 Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, and North and South America brightest objects, and following criteria were put forward: environmental involvement, authorship, the nature of specific forms and links between them. Typology showed that approximately two thirds of the sculpture parks are a product of the natural environment and one third of the architectural environment. In the natural environment, in authentic natural spaces, these are co-author full (independent and contextual) and special (by place, material, style, theme) formats, as well as mono-author formats. In an architectural environment, in integrated or interpreted natural spaces, these are, first of all, city formats that can be both co-authors and mono-authors: destinations, stops, transit zones. The implementation of the typology was facilitated by the attraction of a new material for the national art history. In the scientific circulation were introduced information about objects that were not mentioned before and unknown artists. Accounting for this information, along with known realities, allowed us to reach a higher understanding level of sculpture parks as a modern hypostasis of artistic synthesis.","PeriodicalId":41702,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Kulturologiya i Iskusstvovedenie-Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Kulturologiya i Iskusstvovedenie-Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/41/7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present sculpture parks at the modern stage of development, from the last third of the 20th century to our day. The relevance of this purpose is due to the relevance of these parks, which meets, firstly, on the challenges of culture, reproducing itself in the synthesis of landscape and monumental-decorative arts; secondly, on the demands of the population in artistically interpreted natural spaces; thirdly, on the life-building claims of modern art, which is looking for optimal ways of self-presentation. The representation of the sculpture parks is implied their systematization, which, in the course of the factual and visual material analysis, exhibits the most typical trends of formal and informative diversity and takes the form of a typology. To start building a typology, it was necessary to draw up a rather broad and spacious representative sample of objects and to select reference criteria in the trends of the manifold. Thus, a representative sample was made up of 90 Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, and North and South America brightest objects, and following criteria were put forward: environmental involvement, authorship, the nature of specific forms and links between them. Typology showed that approximately two thirds of the sculpture parks are a product of the natural environment and one third of the architectural environment. In the natural environment, in authentic natural spaces, these are co-author full (independent and contextual) and special (by place, material, style, theme) formats, as well as mono-author formats. In an architectural environment, in integrated or interpreted natural spaces, these are, first of all, city formats that can be both co-authors and mono-authors: destinations, stops, transit zones. The implementation of the typology was facilitated by the attraction of a new material for the national art history. In the scientific circulation were introduced information about objects that were not mentioned before and unknown artists. Accounting for this information, along with known realities, allowed us to reach a higher understanding level of sculpture parks as a modern hypostasis of artistic synthesis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二十世纪雕塑公园的最后三分之一——二十一世纪开端:类型学经验
这篇文章的目的是呈现雕塑公园在现代发展阶段,从20世纪的最后三分之一到我们的日子。这一目的的相关性是由于这些公园的相关性,首先,它满足了文化的挑战,在景观和纪念性装饰艺术的综合中再现了自己;第二,对自然空间进行艺术诠释的人群需求;第三,论现代艺术的生命建构诉求,即寻找最佳的自我呈现方式。雕塑公园的表现形式隐含着它们的系统化,在事实和视觉材料分析的过程中,呈现出形式和信息多样性的最典型趋势,并采取类型学的形式。为了开始建立一个类型学,有必要绘制一个相当广泛和宽敞的具有代表性的对象样本,并在多种趋势中选择参考标准。因此,有代表性的样本由90个欧洲、亚洲、非洲、澳大利亚和南北美洲最亮的物体组成,并提出了以下标准:环境参与、作者身份、特定形式的性质以及它们之间的联系。类型学表明,大约三分之二的雕塑公园是自然环境的产物,三分之一是建筑环境的产物。在自然环境中,在真实的自然空间中,这些是合着者完整(独立和语境)和特殊(按地点、材料、风格、主题)格式,以及单一作者格式。在一个建筑环境中,在整合或诠释的自然空间中,首先,这些城市形式既可以是共同作者,也可以是单一作者:目的地、站点、中转区。国家艺术史的新材料的吸引力促进了类型学的实施。在科学流通中,介绍了以前没有提到的物体和不知名的艺术家的信息。考虑到这些信息,以及已知的现实,使我们对雕塑公园作为艺术综合的现代本质有了更高的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Color in the art of the traditional costume of the indigenous small nations of the tyumen north (on the example of the analysis of museum exhibits) Photography as part of the media culture Preparation and conduct of the first mongolian expedition G.N. Potanina (based on letters from 1874-1878) The gotokaku leaf horn in iconography of japanese mandalas of Muromachi and Edo periods Education as an event: event nature of the university corporativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1