Risk stratification for the primary prevention of arrhythmic sudden cardiac death in post-infarction patients

P. Arsenos, S. Sideris, K. A. Gatzoulis
{"title":"Risk stratification for the primary prevention of arrhythmic sudden cardiac death in post-infarction patients","authors":"P. Arsenos,&nbsp;S. Sideris,&nbsp;K. A. Gatzoulis","doi":"10.1002/cce2.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Current trends on Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) Risk Stratification complementary to the conventional markers that were presented in Part I, are Cardiac Magnetic Resonance that detects and quantifies the post-infarct tissue heterogeneity and the invasive method of Programmed Ventricular Stimulation on Electrophysiological study that reveals the vulnerable and inducible myocardial substrate. While the first generation of Risk Stratification trials examined one simple prognostic marker each time, the second generation of trials investigated in past combinations of SCD prediction markers and prognostic models reflecting different arrhythmogenesis mechanisms. The third generation of trials currently utilizes Risk Stratification strategies to indentify high-risk patients before an ICD prophylactic implantation connecting the Risk Stratification process with the ICD therapy. Intensive research on SCD is also nowadays directed to the unexplored era of patients with a Preserved Ejection Fraction and to the era of early post-myocardial infarction period. Both these subgroup patients are not protected by the current ICDs implantation guidelines because of gap in evidence. Research is going to fill in this gap.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <p><b>Answer questions and earn CME</b>: https://wileyhealthlearning.com/Activity2/4469470/Activity.aspx</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100331,"journal":{"name":"Continuing Cardiology Education","volume":"2 3","pages":"144-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cce2.33","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continuing Cardiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cce2.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Current trends on Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) Risk Stratification complementary to the conventional markers that were presented in Part I, are Cardiac Magnetic Resonance that detects and quantifies the post-infarct tissue heterogeneity and the invasive method of Programmed Ventricular Stimulation on Electrophysiological study that reveals the vulnerable and inducible myocardial substrate. While the first generation of Risk Stratification trials examined one simple prognostic marker each time, the second generation of trials investigated in past combinations of SCD prediction markers and prognostic models reflecting different arrhythmogenesis mechanisms. The third generation of trials currently utilizes Risk Stratification strategies to indentify high-risk patients before an ICD prophylactic implantation connecting the Risk Stratification process with the ICD therapy. Intensive research on SCD is also nowadays directed to the unexplored era of patients with a Preserved Ejection Fraction and to the era of early post-myocardial infarction period. Both these subgroup patients are not protected by the current ICDs implantation guidelines because of gap in evidence. Research is going to fill in this gap.

Answer questions and earn CME: https://wileyhealthlearning.com/Activity2/4469470/Activity.aspx

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
梗死后患者心律失常性心源性猝死一级预防的风险分层
心脏性猝死(SCD)风险分层的当前趋势与第一部分中提出的传统标记相补充,是心脏磁共振检测和量化梗死后组织异质性和程序性心室刺激电生理研究的侵入性方法,该方法揭示了易感和诱导的心肌底物。第一代风险分层试验每次检查一个简单的预后标志物,第二代试验调查了过去SCD预测标志物和反映不同心律失常发生机制的预后模型的组合。第三代试验目前利用风险分层策略在ICD预防性植入前识别高危患者,将风险分层过程与ICD治疗联系起来。目前,对SCD的深入研究也指向了保留射血分数的患者的未知时代和早期心肌梗死后时期。由于缺乏证据,这两个亚组患者都不受当前icd植入指南的保护。研究将填补这一空白。回答问题并获得CME: https://wileyhealthlearning.com/Activity2/4469470/Activity.aspx
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Myocardial perfusion SPECT and SPECT/CT in interventional cardiology Abdominal aortic aneurysm: screening and management Pulmonary arterial hypertension in congenital heart disease Current knowledge on very late stent thrombosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1