Investigation of Parameters Controlling Equivalent Circulating Density ECD in Managed Pressure Drilling MPD

Rahman Ashena, Hossein Bahreini, A. Ghalambor, E. Sahraei, Majid Ahmad Loi Darab
{"title":"Investigation of Parameters Controlling Equivalent Circulating Density ECD in Managed Pressure Drilling MPD","authors":"Rahman Ashena, Hossein Bahreini, A. Ghalambor, E. Sahraei, Majid Ahmad Loi Darab","doi":"10.2118/208869-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD), it is possible to drill holes that simultaneously expose formations with narrow safe mud windows and with pore pressures close to the fracture pressures of other exposed formations with minimal formation influx or mud losses, and also minimal future formation damage during production. In Continuous Circulation Systems (CCS), as a sub-class of MPD, the dynamic or circulating pressure is adjusted to control formation pressures. Therefore, the key factor in success of CCS and prevention of unprecedented formation damage is Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD). This is because a small error in calculation of the ECD can cause a kick influx or drilling fluid loss. Therefore, there is a strong need to investigate the effects of various parameters affecting ECD, which is the objective of this work.\n In this study, a section of a vertical annulus was simulated using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) in 3-D and 2D to determine the effects of different affecting parameters on ECD. The seven investigated parameters in this section consist of DP rotational speed, eccentricity, rate of penetration (ROP), cuttings size, drilling fluid density, rheological parameters, and radius ratio (of drill-pipe OD to wellbore diameter).\n The CFD simulation results show that the ECD of MPD may be significantly affected by the aforementioned parameters. The ECD shows to change due to unprecedented change of the aforementioned affecting parameters. This can potentially jeopardize the MPD drilling operation success. Among the parameters, in laminar flow, radius ratio Yield Point and ROP showed the greatest effect on ECD whereas in turbulent flow radius ratio, PV and mud density showed to have the greatest effect with the other parameters to have minimal effects.","PeriodicalId":10913,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, February 23, 2022","volume":"58 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, February 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208869-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD), it is possible to drill holes that simultaneously expose formations with narrow safe mud windows and with pore pressures close to the fracture pressures of other exposed formations with minimal formation influx or mud losses, and also minimal future formation damage during production. In Continuous Circulation Systems (CCS), as a sub-class of MPD, the dynamic or circulating pressure is adjusted to control formation pressures. Therefore, the key factor in success of CCS and prevention of unprecedented formation damage is Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD). This is because a small error in calculation of the ECD can cause a kick influx or drilling fluid loss. Therefore, there is a strong need to investigate the effects of various parameters affecting ECD, which is the objective of this work. In this study, a section of a vertical annulus was simulated using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) in 3-D and 2D to determine the effects of different affecting parameters on ECD. The seven investigated parameters in this section consist of DP rotational speed, eccentricity, rate of penetration (ROP), cuttings size, drilling fluid density, rheological parameters, and radius ratio (of drill-pipe OD to wellbore diameter). The CFD simulation results show that the ECD of MPD may be significantly affected by the aforementioned parameters. The ECD shows to change due to unprecedented change of the aforementioned affecting parameters. This can potentially jeopardize the MPD drilling operation success. Among the parameters, in laminar flow, radius ratio Yield Point and ROP showed the greatest effect on ECD whereas in turbulent flow radius ratio, PV and mud density showed to have the greatest effect with the other parameters to have minimal effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
控压钻井MPD等效循环密度ECD控制参数研究
在控压钻井(MPD)中,可以在钻出具有狭窄安全泥浆窗口的地层的同时,使孔隙压力接近其他暴露地层的破裂压力,同时使地层流入或泥浆漏失最小,并且在生产过程中也将地层损害降到最低。在连续循环系统(CCS)中,作为MPD的一个子类,通过调节动态压力或循环压力来控制地层压力。因此,CCS成功和防止前所未有的地层损害的关键因素是等效循环密度(ECD)。这是因为ECD计算中的一个小错误就可能导致井涌或钻井液漏失。因此,有必要研究各种参数对ECD的影响,这也是本研究的目的。在本研究中,利用计算流体动力学(CFD)对垂直环空进行了三维和二维模拟,以确定不同影响参数对ECD的影响。本节研究的7个参数包括DP转速、偏心距、钻速(ROP)、岩屑尺寸、钻井液密度、流变参数和半径比(钻杆外径与井筒直径)。CFD模拟结果表明,上述参数对MPD的ECD有较大影响。由于上述影响参数的前所未有的变化,ECD显示出变化。这可能会危及MPD钻井作业的成功。其中,层流条件下,半径比屈服点和ROP对ECD的影响最大,湍流条件下,半径比PV和泥浆密度对ECD的影响最大,其他参数影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Specially Tailored Reservoir Drill-In Fluid and Acid Precursor Technology with Applicability in Ultra Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Wells Completion Damage Uncertainty Driven Formation Damage Control Using Analytical Technique Formation Damage Due to Aqueous Phase Traps in High Permeability Reservoirs and its Impact on Production Enhancement – Experimental Study A Novel Single-Stage Sandstone Acidizing Fluid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1