Effects of Selective Rehabilitation on Neck Pain due to Cervical Spondylosis - A Clinical Trial

Md Abdus Shakoor, -. Shamsunnahar, Nayeem Anwar, Md Muhibbur Rahman, Fatema Zohra, M. Moyeenuzzaman
{"title":"Effects of Selective Rehabilitation on Neck Pain due to Cervical Spondylosis - A Clinical Trial","authors":"Md Abdus Shakoor, -. Shamsunnahar, Nayeem Anwar, Md Muhibbur Rahman, Fatema Zohra, M. Moyeenuzzaman","doi":"10.3329/bjn.v31i2.57387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Pain in the neck is a common complaint of the patients attending the hospital. In clinical practice, neck pain is seen frequently as a presenting symptom and sometimes it becomes disabling and compromises the working capacity. One of the most common causes of pain in the neck is cervical spondylosis. Rehabilitation treatment may play an important role to improve the condition of the patients. For this purpose, the study was done to find out the effects of rehabilitation treatment on chronic neck pain to improve the present situation regarding treatment. \nMethodology: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in the department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. A total of 150 patients were included and they were divided into two groups: group-A and group-B. Group-A was treated with selective rehabilitation and Group –B was treated with NSAID only. History, clinical examination and relevant investigations were done. The findings were recorded at first attendance and follow up was done weekly for six weeks. The results were expressed as mean ± SD and the level of significance was expressed by p-value unless otherwise stated. Student’s ‘t’ tests was done to test the hypothesis. \nResults: Among the study subjects 48(32 %)were male and 102 (68 %) were female. The male female ratio was 1: 2.12. There was significant improvement in both the group after treatment ( P= 0.001). But in comparison between two groups, all the baseline criteria were identical. There was no significant improvement between two groups up to 5th weak( P>05) but significant improvement was seen in Group-B than Group-A after six weeks treatment (P= 0.03). This results indicates that the improvement of the patient with cervical spondylosis was seen in selective rehabilitation group and in NSAIDs group. And improvementwas same in both the group up to 5th week and after six weeks more improvement was found in NSAIDs group. \nConclusions: By this study, it may be concluded that to reduce symptom and disability, rehabilitation treatment can be used effectively for the treatment of chronic neck pain without analgesics and by this way nephropathy due to NSAIDs can be avoided. \nBangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2015; Vol. 31 (2): 102-109","PeriodicalId":8727,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"203 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjn.v31i2.57387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Pain in the neck is a common complaint of the patients attending the hospital. In clinical practice, neck pain is seen frequently as a presenting symptom and sometimes it becomes disabling and compromises the working capacity. One of the most common causes of pain in the neck is cervical spondylosis. Rehabilitation treatment may play an important role to improve the condition of the patients. For this purpose, the study was done to find out the effects of rehabilitation treatment on chronic neck pain to improve the present situation regarding treatment. Methodology: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in the department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. A total of 150 patients were included and they were divided into two groups: group-A and group-B. Group-A was treated with selective rehabilitation and Group –B was treated with NSAID only. History, clinical examination and relevant investigations were done. The findings were recorded at first attendance and follow up was done weekly for six weeks. The results were expressed as mean ± SD and the level of significance was expressed by p-value unless otherwise stated. Student’s ‘t’ tests was done to test the hypothesis. Results: Among the study subjects 48(32 %)were male and 102 (68 %) were female. The male female ratio was 1: 2.12. There was significant improvement in both the group after treatment ( P= 0.001). But in comparison between two groups, all the baseline criteria were identical. There was no significant improvement between two groups up to 5th weak( P>05) but significant improvement was seen in Group-B than Group-A after six weeks treatment (P= 0.03). This results indicates that the improvement of the patient with cervical spondylosis was seen in selective rehabilitation group and in NSAIDs group. And improvementwas same in both the group up to 5th week and after six weeks more improvement was found in NSAIDs group. Conclusions: By this study, it may be concluded that to reduce symptom and disability, rehabilitation treatment can be used effectively for the treatment of chronic neck pain without analgesics and by this way nephropathy due to NSAIDs can be avoided. Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2015; Vol. 31 (2): 102-109
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性康复治疗颈椎病所致颈部疼痛的临床研究
背景:颈部疼痛是住院患者的常见主诉。在临床实践中,颈部疼痛经常被视为一种表现症状,有时它会致残并影响工作能力。颈部疼痛最常见的原因之一是颈椎病。康复治疗可能对改善患者的病情起到重要作用。为此,本研究旨在了解康复治疗对慢性颈部疼痛的治疗效果,以改善治疗现状。方法:在孟加拉国达卡的Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib医科大学物理医学和康复系进行了一项随机临床试验。共纳入150例患者,分为两组:A组和b组。a组给予选择性康复治疗,b组仅给予非甾体抗炎药治疗。进行病史、临床检查及相关调查。首次就诊时记录调查结果,每周随访6周。结果用mean±SD表示,除非另有说明,显著性水平用p值表示。学生的“t”检验是为了检验假设。结果:男性48例(32%),女性102例(68%)。男女比例为1:2 .12。两组治疗后均有显著改善(P= 0.001)。但在两组的比较中,所有的基线标准都是相同的。治疗6周后,b组较a组有明显改善(P= 0.03),但两组间至第5弱无明显改善(P > 0.05)。结果表明,选择性康复组和非甾体抗炎药组颈椎病患者病情均有改善。到第五周,两组的改善是一样的,六周后,非甾体抗炎药组的改善更大。结论:通过本研究,可以得出结论,在无镇痛药的情况下,可以有效地采用康复治疗来治疗慢性颈部疼痛,以减轻症状和残疾,从而避免非甾体抗炎药引起的肾病。孟加拉国神经科学杂志2015;Vol. 31 (2): 102-109
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Risk Factors on the Size of Ruptured Intracranial Saccular Aneurysms Demographic and Clinical Pattern of Headache in Migraine Patients Infarct Pattern in Patients with Varying Degrees of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Prognostic significance of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Score in predicting 30-day mortality in Chittagong Medical College Hospital Clinical, Autonomic & Electrophysiological Features in Patients with Guillain Barre Syndrome in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1