Physical Management of Pain and Disability among Healthcare Workers Due to Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 1.7 Q2 REHABILITATION Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.57197/jdr-2023-0022
M. Salman, M. Shrahili, I. Elbatal
{"title":"Physical Management of Pain and Disability among Healthcare Workers Due to Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"M. Salman, M. Shrahili, I. Elbatal","doi":"10.57197/jdr-2023-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mechanical neck pain (MNP) in the second most common disability among healthcare workers. The main objective of this study was to compare the effects of dry needling (DN) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for the management of MNP among healthcare workers. A single blind RCT (n = 30) was conducted at the Neuro Counsel Clinic, Islamabad. Simple convenient sampling techniques were used to recruit participants of age 20-50 years who had no comorbidity of any kind. Two equal groups were made. Group A received DN for ×1/day for 2 weeks and Group B received TENS at the rate of ×2/day for 2 weeks. Data were evaluated on the basis of Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) score. Prepost data were analyzed for within group (Wilcoxon rank test) and between groups (Mann–Whitney U test). The level of significance was kept at P < 0.05. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of age in Group A was 33.87 ± 8.18 while in Group B it was 33.67 ± 7.60. Wilcoxon rank test revealed that both techniques are effective for within-group analysis (P < 0.001). Mann–Whitney U test revealed that both techniques showed no significant results on NPRS score as P > 0.05 but the NDI score revealed that there is a significant difference between groups (P < 0.05). On the basis of results, it is concluded that DN is more effective when compared to TENS for disability management in MNP sufferers.","PeriodicalId":46073,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57197/jdr-2023-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mechanical neck pain (MNP) in the second most common disability among healthcare workers. The main objective of this study was to compare the effects of dry needling (DN) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for the management of MNP among healthcare workers. A single blind RCT (n = 30) was conducted at the Neuro Counsel Clinic, Islamabad. Simple convenient sampling techniques were used to recruit participants of age 20-50 years who had no comorbidity of any kind. Two equal groups were made. Group A received DN for ×1/day for 2 weeks and Group B received TENS at the rate of ×2/day for 2 weeks. Data were evaluated on the basis of Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) score. Prepost data were analyzed for within group (Wilcoxon rank test) and between groups (Mann–Whitney U test). The level of significance was kept at P < 0.05. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of age in Group A was 33.87 ± 8.18 while in Group B it was 33.67 ± 7.60. Wilcoxon rank test revealed that both techniques are effective for within-group analysis (P < 0.001). Mann–Whitney U test revealed that both techniques showed no significant results on NPRS score as P > 0.05 but the NDI score revealed that there is a significant difference between groups (P < 0.05). On the basis of results, it is concluded that DN is more effective when compared to TENS for disability management in MNP sufferers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械性颈部疼痛对医护人员疼痛和残疾的物理管理:一项随机对照试验
机械性颈痛(MNP)是医疗工作者中第二常见的残疾。本研究的主要目的是比较干针(DN)和经皮神经电刺激(TENS)治疗医护人员MNP的效果。在伊斯兰堡神经咨询诊所进行单盲随机对照试验(n = 30)。采用简单方便的抽样技术,招募年龄在20-50岁、无任何合并症的参与者。分成两组。A组给予DN (×1/天),连续2周;B组给予TENS (×2/天),连续2周。根据数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)和颈部残疾指数(NDI)评分对数据进行评估。对前后资料进行组内(Wilcoxon秩检验)和组间(Mann-Whitney U检验)分析。显著性水平保持在P < 0.05。A组年龄均值±标准差(SD)为33.87±8.18,B组年龄均值±标准差(SD)为33.67±7.60。Wilcoxon秩次检验显示两种方法对组内分析都有效(P < 0.001)。Mann-Whitney U检验显示,两种技术对NPRS评分的影响均无显著性差异(P < 0.05),但NDI评分组间差异有显著性意义(P < 0.05)。结果表明,与TENS相比,DN对MNP患者的残疾管理更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Scoping Review of Research Exploring Working Life Practices of People with Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic Disability, Race, and Origin Intersectionality in the Doctoral Program: Ableism in Higher Education Numerical Investigation on the Performance of Prosthetic Running Blades by Using Different Materials Prevalence of Premenstrual Syndrome and Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder Among Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing Women with Mood Disorders in Saudi Arabia Layers of Disability Terminology Experiences of People with Disabilities and their Relatives: An Analysis of Dutch Newspapers between 1950–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1