Comparison of the Power Factor of SMPM and SM Vernier Outer Runner Machines for Traction Applications

D. Thyroff, C. Hittinger, I. Hahn
{"title":"Comparison of the Power Factor of SMPM and SM Vernier Outer Runner Machines for Traction Applications","authors":"D. Thyroff, C. Hittinger, I. Hahn","doi":"10.1109/INTMAG.2018.8508462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low voltage traction applications demand high torques at low speeds and at a small design space. In order to achieve high torque densities, manufacturers often combine high-speed machines with mechanical gearboxes. In the past decade, flux modulation machines came up, offering low speeds and high torque densities by utilizing the magnetic gearing effect. The idea is to remove the mechanical gear and get a compact direct drive solution. Now, the Vernier machines are a subgroup of the flux modulation machines. However, literature reports very poor power factors for Vernier machines in comparison to PM machines as the main drawback. Nevertheless, the presented studies always assume a fixed speed and only one single current operating point. This is correct for fixed speed applications, e.g. pumps and blowers, but it is not correct for traction applications, because the machine cycles dynamically through the torque-speed curve. Therefore, this paper first investigates the machine design requirements considering the machine control strategies and the needs of traction applications. Furthermore, a method to check if the design fulfills the given requirements by calculating only a single operating point is presented. In addition, the emerging differences between Vernier and PM machines are explained using analytic results. Furthermore, the paper presents a power factor comparison of torque optimized Vernier and PM machines while considering iron losses. Thereby, the comparison covers the whole torque-speed range, including the field weakening area.","PeriodicalId":6571,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Magnetic Conference (INTERMAG)","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Magnetic Conference (INTERMAG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTMAG.2018.8508462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Low voltage traction applications demand high torques at low speeds and at a small design space. In order to achieve high torque densities, manufacturers often combine high-speed machines with mechanical gearboxes. In the past decade, flux modulation machines came up, offering low speeds and high torque densities by utilizing the magnetic gearing effect. The idea is to remove the mechanical gear and get a compact direct drive solution. Now, the Vernier machines are a subgroup of the flux modulation machines. However, literature reports very poor power factors for Vernier machines in comparison to PM machines as the main drawback. Nevertheless, the presented studies always assume a fixed speed and only one single current operating point. This is correct for fixed speed applications, e.g. pumps and blowers, but it is not correct for traction applications, because the machine cycles dynamically through the torque-speed curve. Therefore, this paper first investigates the machine design requirements considering the machine control strategies and the needs of traction applications. Furthermore, a method to check if the design fulfills the given requirements by calculating only a single operating point is presented. In addition, the emerging differences between Vernier and PM machines are explained using analytic results. Furthermore, the paper presents a power factor comparison of torque optimized Vernier and PM machines while considering iron losses. Thereby, the comparison covers the whole torque-speed range, including the field weakening area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牵引用SMPM和SM游标外滚轮机功率因数的比较
低压牵引应用需要在低速和小设计空间下的高扭矩。为了实现高扭矩密度,制造商通常将高速机器与机械齿轮箱相结合。在过去的十年里,磁通调制机器出现了,通过利用磁传动效应提供低速度和高扭矩密度。这个想法是去除机械齿轮,并得到一个紧凑的直接驱动解决方案。游标电机是磁通调制电机的一个分支。然而,文献报告非常差的功率因素游标机相比,作为主要缺点的PM机。然而,目前的研究总是假设一个固定的速度和只有一个单一的电流工作点。这对于固定速度的应用是正确的,例如泵和鼓风机,但对于牵引应用是不正确的,因为机器通过扭矩-速度曲线动态循环。因此,本文首先研究了考虑机床控制策略和牵引应用需求的机床设计要求。此外,还提出了一种通过计算单个工作点来检验设计是否满足给定要求的方法。此外,游标和PM机器之间的新出现的差异是解释使用分析结果。此外,本文还比较了考虑铁损的转矩优化游标电机和永磁电机的功率因数。因此,比较涵盖了整个转矩-转速范围,包括弱磁场区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High-order methods applied to electrical machine modeling. 3D Structure Line Start Synchronous Reluctance Motor Design Based on Selective Laser Melting of 3D Printing. Memory Efficient Harmonic Method for Electromagnetic Models Using Scattering Matrices. Convergence Analysis of SEM and FEM to an analytical field distribution in the airgap. Eddy Current-TMR Sensor for Micro-Motion Detection of Orthopaedic Implants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1