Methodological investigations into low technology monitoring of atmospheric metal pollution: Part 3—The degree of replicability of the metal concentrations

F.A.Y. Gailey, O.Ll. Lloyd
{"title":"Methodological investigations into low technology monitoring of atmospheric metal pollution: Part 3—The degree of replicability of the metal concentrations","authors":"F.A.Y. Gailey,&nbsp;O.Ll. Lloyd","doi":"10.1016/0143-148X(86)90050-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Methodological investigations were undertaken to determine the replicability of the concentrations of metals in a number of low technology samplers. Most of these samplers were subsequently used for the main monitoring survey of atmospheric metal pollution in Armadale, an industrial town in central Scotland. The indigenous samplers included <em>Hypnum</em> (moss), <em>Lecanora</em> (lichen), <em>Agropyron</em> (grass) and surface soils. The transplanted samplers included spherical moss bags (acid washed), <em>Hypogymnia</em> (lichen) and tak (synthetic fabric). Other samplers were added for purposes of comparison: translated flat moss bags (acid washed), another two types of spherical moss bag (fresh moss and water washed), dead <em>Hypogymnia</em> and a fruticose lichen.</p><p>Of the low technology samplers selected for use in the main monitoring survey, all except the surface soils gave concentrations of most metals that were well within an acceptable range of variability. However, metals such as Cr and Ni, which were present in low concentrations, showed values which were significantly less replicable than those of the other metals.</p><p>Of the comparison samplers, the flat moss bags, water-washed spherical moss bags and the dead <em>Hypogymnia</em> gave very replicable concentrations of metals; the fresh moss bags and the fruticose lichens gave the least consistent metal values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100484,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution Series B, Chemical and Physical","volume":"12 2","pages":"Pages 85-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0143-148X(86)90050-9","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution Series B, Chemical and Physical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0143148X86900509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Methodological investigations were undertaken to determine the replicability of the concentrations of metals in a number of low technology samplers. Most of these samplers were subsequently used for the main monitoring survey of atmospheric metal pollution in Armadale, an industrial town in central Scotland. The indigenous samplers included Hypnum (moss), Lecanora (lichen), Agropyron (grass) and surface soils. The transplanted samplers included spherical moss bags (acid washed), Hypogymnia (lichen) and tak (synthetic fabric). Other samplers were added for purposes of comparison: translated flat moss bags (acid washed), another two types of spherical moss bag (fresh moss and water washed), dead Hypogymnia and a fruticose lichen.

Of the low technology samplers selected for use in the main monitoring survey, all except the surface soils gave concentrations of most metals that were well within an acceptable range of variability. However, metals such as Cr and Ni, which were present in low concentrations, showed values which were significantly less replicable than those of the other metals.

Of the comparison samplers, the flat moss bags, water-washed spherical moss bags and the dead Hypogymnia gave very replicable concentrations of metals; the fresh moss bags and the fruticose lichens gave the least consistent metal values.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大气金属污染低技术监测的方法学研究。第3部分:金属浓度的可复制程度
进行了方法学调查,以确定一些低技术取样器中金属浓度的可重复性。这些采样器中的大多数随后被用于苏格兰中部工业城镇Armadale的大气金属污染主要监测调查。本地采样包括Hypnum(苔藓)、Lecanora(地衣)、Agropyron(草)和表层土壤。移植的样品包括球形苔藓袋(酸洗),Hypogymnia(地衣)和tak(合成织物)。为了进行比较,加入了其他样本:翻译的扁平苔藓袋(酸洗),另外两种类型的球形苔藓袋(新鲜苔藓和水洗),死的Hypogymnia和一种水果地衣。在选择用于主要监测调查的低技术取样器中,除表层土壤外,所有取样器中大多数金属的浓度都在可接受的变化范围内。然而,像Cr和Ni这样的低浓度金属,其值的可复制性明显低于其他金属。在比较样本中,扁平苔藓袋,水洗球形苔藓袋和死亡的Hypogymnia提供了非常可复制的金属浓度;新鲜苔藓袋和水果地衣的金属值最不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Announcements Editorial Announcements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1