Access Differentials in Primary Healthcare among Vulnerable Populations in a Health Insurance Setting in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 1.7 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Advances in Public Health Pub Date : 2021-07-27 DOI:10.1155/2021/9911436
G. Acquah-Hagan, D. Boateng, E. Appiah-Brempong, Peter Twum, Joseph Amankwa Atta, P. Agyei-Baffour
{"title":"Access Differentials in Primary Healthcare among Vulnerable Populations in a Health Insurance Setting in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"G. Acquah-Hagan, D. Boateng, E. Appiah-Brempong, Peter Twum, Joseph Amankwa Atta, P. Agyei-Baffour","doi":"10.1155/2021/9911436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Access to healthcare remains a challenge towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals in Ghana. There still remain inequalities in the distribution of health services especially among vulnerable groups despite sustained efforts to strengthen the health system. This study was conducted to analyze access differentials among different vulnerable groups in the context of primary healthcare under a National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in Ghana. Methods. This study was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted among multilevel participants of vulnerable groups in Kumasi Metropolis: 710 vulnerable people constituting elderly/aged (n = 359), pregnant women (n = 117), head poters (teenage girls who migrated from the northern Ghana mainly to the capital cities of the Ashanti and Greater Accra region to help in carrying of goods for their livelihood) (n = 86), sex workers (n = 75), and other vulnerable groups (people with disabilities and street participants) (n = 73). Data were collected using a semistructured questionnaire. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to access the association between vulnerability and access to healthcare. Results. Close to a fifth, 18.5% of the study respondents were unable to access care at any point in time during the last 12 months. Reasons for the inability to access healthcare included limited funding (69.7%), poor attitude of service providers (7.6%), distance to health centers (8.3%), and religious reasons (6.2%). More than 95% of respondents were insured under the NHIS, but acceptability of service provision under the NHIS was low among the vulnerable groups. In the crude models, pregnant women had lower prevalence of access to medications as compared to the elderly (prevalence ratio (PR): 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80–0.98). Head poters and other vulnerable groups were also less likely to view healthcare as affordable as compared to the elderly. The differences in healthcare access observed were attenuated after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics and healthcare-related factors. Conclusions. Despite the introduction of a NHIS in Ghana, this study highlights challenges in healthcare access among vulnerable populations independent of the type of vulnerability. This suggests the need for stakeholders to work to address access differentials in the NHIS and adopt other innovative care strategies that may have broader applicability for all populations.","PeriodicalId":30619,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Public Health","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9911436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background. Access to healthcare remains a challenge towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals in Ghana. There still remain inequalities in the distribution of health services especially among vulnerable groups despite sustained efforts to strengthen the health system. This study was conducted to analyze access differentials among different vulnerable groups in the context of primary healthcare under a National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in Ghana. Methods. This study was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted among multilevel participants of vulnerable groups in Kumasi Metropolis: 710 vulnerable people constituting elderly/aged (n = 359), pregnant women (n = 117), head poters (teenage girls who migrated from the northern Ghana mainly to the capital cities of the Ashanti and Greater Accra region to help in carrying of goods for their livelihood) (n = 86), sex workers (n = 75), and other vulnerable groups (people with disabilities and street participants) (n = 73). Data were collected using a semistructured questionnaire. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to access the association between vulnerability and access to healthcare. Results. Close to a fifth, 18.5% of the study respondents were unable to access care at any point in time during the last 12 months. Reasons for the inability to access healthcare included limited funding (69.7%), poor attitude of service providers (7.6%), distance to health centers (8.3%), and religious reasons (6.2%). More than 95% of respondents were insured under the NHIS, but acceptability of service provision under the NHIS was low among the vulnerable groups. In the crude models, pregnant women had lower prevalence of access to medications as compared to the elderly (prevalence ratio (PR): 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80–0.98). Head poters and other vulnerable groups were also less likely to view healthcare as affordable as compared to the elderly. The differences in healthcare access observed were attenuated after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics and healthcare-related factors. Conclusions. Despite the introduction of a NHIS in Ghana, this study highlights challenges in healthcare access among vulnerable populations independent of the type of vulnerability. This suggests the need for stakeholders to work to address access differentials in the NHIS and adopt other innovative care strategies that may have broader applicability for all populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在健康保险设置在库马西大都市,加纳弱势群体获得初级保健的差异:一个横断面研究
背景。在加纳,获得医疗保健仍然是实现可持续发展目标的一个挑战。尽管为加强卫生系统作出了持续努力,但在卫生服务的分配方面仍然存在不平等现象,特别是在弱势群体中。本研究旨在分析加纳国家健康保险计划(NHIS)下不同弱势群体在初级卫生保健方面的差异。方法。本研究是对库马西大都市弱势群体多层次参与者进行的描述性横断面研究:710名弱势群体,包括老年人/老年人(n = 359)、孕妇(n = 117)、首席陶工(主要从加纳北部迁移到阿散蒂和大阿克拉地区的首府城市以帮助搬运生计所需货物的少女)(n = 86)、性工作者(n = 75)和其他弱势群体(残疾人和街头参与者)(n = 73)。使用半结构化问卷收集数据。使用具有稳健方差的泊松回归来获得脆弱性与获得医疗保健之间的关联。结果。近五分之一(18.5%)的研究受访者在过去12个月的任何时间点都无法获得医疗服务。无法获得医疗服务的原因包括资金有限(69.7%)、服务提供者态度差(7.6%)、距离医疗中心太远(8.3%)和宗教原因(6.2%)。超过95%的受访者参加了全国健康保险计划,但弱势群体对全国健康保险计划的接受程度较低。在粗模型中,与老年人相比,孕妇获得药物的患病率较低(患病率比(PR): 0.88;95% ci: 0.80-0.98)。与老年人相比,头部陶工和其他弱势群体也不太可能认为医疗保健负担得起。在调整社会人口特征和卫生保健相关因素后,观察到的卫生保健可及性差异减弱。结论。尽管在加纳引入了国家卫生保健系统,但本研究强调了与脆弱性类型无关的弱势群体在获得医疗保健方面面临的挑战。这表明利益相关者需要努力解决国家卫生保健系统中的获取差异,并采取其他可能对所有人群具有更广泛适用性的创新护理战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Public Health
Advances in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Glycemic Index Values of Stiff Porridge (Ugali) Prepared from Maize, Millet, and Sorghum Flours: Which One for Diabetes Management? Childhood Overweight/Obesity amidst Migration, Socioeconomic Factors, and Obesogenic Behaviors: Insights from the Growing Up in New Zealand Study A Critical Review of Social Exclusion and Inclusion among Immigrant and Refugee Women The Antibiotic Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors of Patients Purchasing Antibiotics without Prescription: Results of National Survey Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Intake, Dietary Behavior, Mental Health, and Academic Performance of a Ghanaian University Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1