Extended Mechanical Circulatory Support With a Continuous‐Flow Rotary Left Ventricular Assist Device

S. Harris, D. Tepper, Randy J. Ip
{"title":"Extended Mechanical Circulatory Support With a Continuous‐Flow Rotary Left Ventricular Assist Device","authors":"S. Harris, D. Tepper, Randy J. Ip","doi":"10.1111/J.1751-7133.2009.00131_1.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract.  Objectives.  This study sought to evaluate the use of a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to heart transplant \n \n \n \nBackground LVAD therapy is an established treatment modality for patients with advanced heart failure. Pulsatile LVADs have limitations in design precluding their use for extended support. Continuous-flow rotary LVADs represent an innovative design with potential for small size and greater reliability by simplification of the pumping mechanism. \n \n \n \nMethods In a prospective multicenter study, 281 patients urgently listed (United Network for Organ Sharing status 1A or 1B) for heart transplant underwent implant of a continuous-flow LVAD. Survival and transplant rates were assessed at 18 months. Patients were assessed for adverse events throughout the study and for quality of life, functional status, and organ function for 6 months. \n \n \n \nResults Of 281 patients, 222 (79%) underwent transplant or LVAD removal for cardiac recovery or had ongoing LVAD support at 18-month follow-up. Actuarial survival on support was 72% (95% confidence interval, 65%–79%) at 18 months. At 6 months, there were significant improvements in functional status and 6-minute walk test results (from 0% to 83% of patients in New York Heart Association functional class I or II and from 13% to 89% of patients completing a 6-minute walk test) and in quality of life (mean values improved 41% with Minnesota Living With Heart Failure and 75% with Kansas City Cardiomyopathy questionnaires). Major adverse events included bleeding, stroke, right heart failure, and percutaneous lead infection. Pump thrombosis occurred in 4 patients. \n \n \n \nConclusions A continuous-flow LVAD provides effective hemodynamic support for at least 18 months in patients awaiting transplant, with improved functional status and quality of life.","PeriodicalId":10536,"journal":{"name":"Congestive heart failure","volume":"18 1","pages":"85-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congestive heart failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1751-7133.2009.00131_1.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract.  Objectives.  This study sought to evaluate the use of a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to heart transplant Background LVAD therapy is an established treatment modality for patients with advanced heart failure. Pulsatile LVADs have limitations in design precluding their use for extended support. Continuous-flow rotary LVADs represent an innovative design with potential for small size and greater reliability by simplification of the pumping mechanism. Methods In a prospective multicenter study, 281 patients urgently listed (United Network for Organ Sharing status 1A or 1B) for heart transplant underwent implant of a continuous-flow LVAD. Survival and transplant rates were assessed at 18 months. Patients were assessed for adverse events throughout the study and for quality of life, functional status, and organ function for 6 months. Results Of 281 patients, 222 (79%) underwent transplant or LVAD removal for cardiac recovery or had ongoing LVAD support at 18-month follow-up. Actuarial survival on support was 72% (95% confidence interval, 65%–79%) at 18 months. At 6 months, there were significant improvements in functional status and 6-minute walk test results (from 0% to 83% of patients in New York Heart Association functional class I or II and from 13% to 89% of patients completing a 6-minute walk test) and in quality of life (mean values improved 41% with Minnesota Living With Heart Failure and 75% with Kansas City Cardiomyopathy questionnaires). Major adverse events included bleeding, stroke, right heart failure, and percutaneous lead infection. Pump thrombosis occurred in 4 patients. Conclusions A continuous-flow LVAD provides effective hemodynamic support for at least 18 months in patients awaiting transplant, with improved functional status and quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩展机械循环支持与连续流动旋转左心室辅助装置
摘要目标。本研究旨在评估连续血流旋转左心室辅助装置(LVAD)作为心脏移植的桥梁的使用背景LVAD治疗是晚期心力衰竭患者的既定治疗方式。脉动式左心室辅助装置在设计上有局限性,无法用于扩展支持。连续流旋转lvad代表了一种创新设计,通过简化泵送机构,具有小尺寸和更高可靠性的潜力。方法在一项前瞻性多中心研究中,281例紧急列入(器官共享状态联合网络1A或1B)的心脏移植患者接受了连续血流LVAD的植入。18个月时评估生存率和移植率。评估患者在整个研究过程中的不良事件,以及6个月的生活质量、功能状态和器官功能。结果在281例患者中,222例(79%)在18个月的随访中接受了移植或LVAD移除以恢复心脏或持续LVAD支持。18个月时精算支持生存率为72%(95%置信区间,65%-79%)。在6个月时,功能状态和6分钟步行测试结果(从0%到83%的纽约心脏协会功能I或II类患者,从13%到89%的完成6分钟步行测试的患者)和生活质量(明尼苏达州心力衰竭患者的平均值提高了41%,堪萨斯城心肌病问卷调查的平均值提高了75%)均有显著改善。主要不良事件包括出血、中风、右心衰和经皮铅感染。4例发生泵血栓形成。结论连续血流LVAD可为等待移植患者提供至少18个月的有效血流动力学支持,改善功能状态和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Hospital Mortality With Intra‐Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation Insertion Before vs After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Increased Mortality Associated With Low Use of Clopidogrel in Patients With Heart Failure and Acute Myocardial Infarction Not Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Heart Failure: Current Clinical Understanding Pathophysiology of volume overload in acute heart failure syndromes Dynamic Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Elderly People
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1