Model verification of analogue infiltration predictions

R.E. Bilsborrow , F.R. Fricke
{"title":"Model verification of analogue infiltration predictions","authors":"R.E. Bilsborrow ,&nbsp;F.R. Fricke","doi":"10.1016/0007-3628(75)90034-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A survey of current methods of calculating natural ventilation and infiltration rates showed that most design recommendations are based on the results of digital analogue studies. As the natural ventilation rate calculation methods reviewed make a number of simplifying assumptions, which have not been experimentally verified, studies have been carried out, using scale model buildings in a wind tunnel, to investigate the validity of these methods. Calculated ventilation rates were found to be up to 30% higher than the model ventilation rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9442,"journal":{"name":"Building Science","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 217-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0007-3628(75)90034-1","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Science","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0007362875900341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

A survey of current methods of calculating natural ventilation and infiltration rates showed that most design recommendations are based on the results of digital analogue studies. As the natural ventilation rate calculation methods reviewed make a number of simplifying assumptions, which have not been experimentally verified, studies have been carried out, using scale model buildings in a wind tunnel, to investigate the validity of these methods. Calculated ventilation rates were found to be up to 30% higher than the model ventilation rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟入渗预测的模型验证
一项对目前计算自然通风和渗透率的方法的调查表明,大多数设计建议都是基于数字模拟研究的结果。由于所审查的自然通风量计算方法进行了许多简化的假设,这些假设尚未得到实验验证,因此在风洞中使用比例模型建筑物进行研究,以调查这些方法的有效性。计算出的通风率比模型通风率高出30%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Finite Element Analysis for Unstiffened Overlapped CHS KK-Joints Welded in Different Ways Experimental Study on Sensor Fault Detection and Diagnosis and Estimation of Centrifugal Chiller System Research and Development in HVAC System Diagnosis Study of the influence of a pelmet type wind deflector on indoor air motion The application of a partial boundary layer wind tunnel to the examination of dynamic response of cantilever structures to wind excitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1