Contact allergenic potency: Correlation of human and local lymph node assay data

G.Frank Gerberick, Michael K. Robinson, Cindy A. Ryan, Rebecca J. Dearman, Ian Kimber, David A. Basketter, Zoe Wright, James G. Marks
{"title":"Contact allergenic potency: Correlation of human and local lymph node assay data","authors":"G.Frank Gerberick,&nbsp;Michael K. Robinson,&nbsp;Cindy A. Ryan,&nbsp;Rebecca J. Dearman,&nbsp;Ian Kimber,&nbsp;David A. Basketter,&nbsp;Zoe Wright,&nbsp;James G. Marks","doi":"10.1053/ajcd.2001.23926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> Effective toxicologic evaluation of skin sensitization requires that potential contact allergens are identified and that the likely risks of sensitization among exposed populations are assessed. By definition, chemicals that are classified as contact sensitizers have the capacity to cause allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in humans. However, this hazard is not an all-or-nothing phenomenon; clear dose-response relationships can be discerned and thresholds identified for both the induction of sensitization and the elicitation of ACD. Commonly, these parameters are grouped under the heading of potency, the determination of which is vital for risk assessment. Preclinical testing for sensitization potential is critically important for hazard assessment before human exposure. The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is the most recently accepted test method for sensitization hazard assessment. <strong>Objective:</strong> The aim was to compare potency estimations derived from LLNA data with clinical determinations of relative potency based on human data. <strong>Methods:</strong> No-effect levels (NOELs) for a range of 21 chemicals were determined from nondiagnostic human repeat patch test studies as reported in the literature. These levels were compared with LLNA EC<sub>3</sub> values, the estimated concentration required to produce a 3-fold increase (positive response) in draining lymph node cell (LNC) proliferative activity. <strong>Results:</strong> Using available human repeat patch test data, together with expert judgment, the compounds were classified as strong, moderate, weak, extremely weak, or nonsensitizing. Additionally, the potency of each chemical was classified independently based on its LLNA EC<sub>3</sub> value. The results show clearly that LLNA EC<sub>3</sub> values are very comparable with the NOELs calculated from the literature. Moreover, the potency rankings based upon LLNA EC<sub>3</sub> data support their human classification. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> The present investigations show that the LLNA can be used to provide quantitative estimates of relative skin sensitizing potency EC<sub>3</sub> values that correlate closely with NOELs established from human repeat patch testing and from our clinical experience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7653,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 156-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/ajcd.2001.23926","citationCount":"171","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046199X01494863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 171

Abstract

Background: Effective toxicologic evaluation of skin sensitization requires that potential contact allergens are identified and that the likely risks of sensitization among exposed populations are assessed. By definition, chemicals that are classified as contact sensitizers have the capacity to cause allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in humans. However, this hazard is not an all-or-nothing phenomenon; clear dose-response relationships can be discerned and thresholds identified for both the induction of sensitization and the elicitation of ACD. Commonly, these parameters are grouped under the heading of potency, the determination of which is vital for risk assessment. Preclinical testing for sensitization potential is critically important for hazard assessment before human exposure. The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is the most recently accepted test method for sensitization hazard assessment. Objective: The aim was to compare potency estimations derived from LLNA data with clinical determinations of relative potency based on human data. Methods: No-effect levels (NOELs) for a range of 21 chemicals were determined from nondiagnostic human repeat patch test studies as reported in the literature. These levels were compared with LLNA EC3 values, the estimated concentration required to produce a 3-fold increase (positive response) in draining lymph node cell (LNC) proliferative activity. Results: Using available human repeat patch test data, together with expert judgment, the compounds were classified as strong, moderate, weak, extremely weak, or nonsensitizing. Additionally, the potency of each chemical was classified independently based on its LLNA EC3 value. The results show clearly that LLNA EC3 values are very comparable with the NOELs calculated from the literature. Moreover, the potency rankings based upon LLNA EC3 data support their human classification. Conclusion: The present investigations show that the LLNA can be used to provide quantitative estimates of relative skin sensitizing potency EC3 values that correlate closely with NOELs established from human repeat patch testing and from our clinical experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接触致敏效力:人与局部淋巴结化验数据的相关性
背景:有效的皮肤致敏毒理学评估需要识别潜在的接触过敏原,并评估暴露人群中致敏的可能风险。根据定义,被归类为接触致敏剂的化学物质具有引起人类过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)的能力。然而,这种危险并不是一个全有或全无的现象;可以识别明确的剂量-反应关系,并确定致敏诱导和ACD引发的阈值。通常,这些参数在效力的标题下分组,其确定对风险评估至关重要。致敏潜力的临床前测试对于人类接触前的危害评估至关重要。小鼠局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)是最近公认的致敏危害评估的试验方法。目的:目的是比较从LLNA数据得出的效价估计与基于人体数据的临床相对效价测定。方法:从文献报道的非诊断性人体重复斑贴试验研究中确定21种化学物质的无效应水平(NOELs)。这些水平与LLNA EC3值进行比较,LLNA EC3值是使引流淋巴结细胞(LNC)增殖活性增加3倍(阳性反应)所需的估计浓度。结果:利用现有的人体重复斑贴试验数据,结合专家判断,将化合物分为强、中等、弱、极弱或不敏感。此外,每种化学物质的效力根据其LLNA EC3值独立分类。结果清楚地表明,LLNA EC3值与文献中计算的noel值非常相似。此外,基于LLNA EC3数据的效力排序支持它们的人类分类。结论:目前的研究表明,LLNA可用于提供相对皮肤致敏效力EC3值的定量估计,EC3值与人类重复贴片试验和临床经验建立的noel密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS OF THE FEET LONG-TERM STUDY ON PRIMARY PREVENTION OF IRRITANT CONTACT DERMATITIS A REVIEW OF PATCH TESTING WITH PRESERVATIVES AT ST. JOHNʼS INSTITUTE OF DERMATOLOGY FROM 1995 TO 2000 CONTACT ALLERGY TO METAL AND TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY QUALITY OF LIFE ANALYSIS IN PATIENTS WITH HAND DERMATITIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1