Optimal assignment mechanisms with imperfect verification

IF 1.2 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Theoretical Economics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3982/te5088
J. Pereyra, Francisco Silva
{"title":"Optimal assignment mechanisms with imperfect verification","authors":"J. Pereyra, Francisco Silva","doi":"10.3982/te5088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objects of different quality are to be allocated to agents. Agents can receive at most one object, and there are not enough high‐quality objects for every agent. The value to the social planner from allocating objects to any given agent depends on that agent's private information. The social planner is unable to use transfers to give incentives for agents to convey their private information. Instead, she is able to imperfectly verify their reports through signals that are positively affiliated with each agent's type. We characterize mechanisms that maximize the social planner's expected payoff. In the optimal mechanism, each agent chooses one of various tracks, which are characterized by two thresholds. If the agent's signal exceeds the upper threshold of the chosen track, the agent receives a high‐quality object, if it is between the two thresholds, he receives a low‐quality object, and if it is below the lower threshold, he receives no object.","PeriodicalId":46923,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Economics","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3982/te5088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objects of different quality are to be allocated to agents. Agents can receive at most one object, and there are not enough high‐quality objects for every agent. The value to the social planner from allocating objects to any given agent depends on that agent's private information. The social planner is unable to use transfers to give incentives for agents to convey their private information. Instead, she is able to imperfectly verify their reports through signals that are positively affiliated with each agent's type. We characterize mechanisms that maximize the social planner's expected payoff. In the optimal mechanism, each agent chooses one of various tracks, which are characterized by two thresholds. If the agent's signal exceeds the upper threshold of the chosen track, the agent receives a high‐quality object, if it is between the two thresholds, he receives a low‐quality object, and if it is below the lower threshold, he receives no object.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证不完善的最优分配机制
将不同质量的物品分配给代理商。智能体最多只能接收一个对象,并不是每个智能体都有足够的高质量对象。将对象分配给任何给定代理的社会规划器的价值取决于该代理的私有信息。社会计划者无法用转移来激励代理人传递他们的私人信息。相反,她能够通过与每个代理的类型积极相关的信号来不完美地验证他们的报告。我们描述了最大化社会计划者预期收益的机制。在最优机制中,每个智能体从各种轨迹中选择一条,这些轨迹由两个阈值表征。如果智能体的信号超过所选轨道的上阈值,智能体接收到一个高质量的物体,如果在两个阈值之间,他接收到一个低质量的物体,如果低于下阈值,他没有接收到物体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Theoretical Economics publishes leading research in economic theory. It is published by the Econometric Society three times a year, in January, May, and September. All content is freely available. It is included in the Social Sciences Citation Index
期刊最新文献
NOT BY MAX WEBER ALONE: HISTORICAL TYPES OF STATE BUREAUCRACY (THE ADVANTAGES AND SHORTCOMINGS) STUDENT YOUTH’ SOCIAL ACTIVITY MASS PRACTICES On rank dominance of tie‐breaking rules UNDERSTANDING ECONOMIC SECURITY IN RUSSIA: OFFICIAL DOCTRINE AND ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES Loss aversion in sequential auctions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1