Upper and Lower Bound Estimates of Inequality of Opportunity: A Cross‐National Comparison for Europe

IF 1.9 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Review of Income and Wealth Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1111/roiw.12622
Rafael Carranza
{"title":"Upper and Lower Bound Estimates of Inequality of Opportunity: A Cross‐National Comparison for Europe","authors":"Rafael Carranza","doi":"10.1111/roiw.12622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I provide lower and upper bound estimates of inequality of opportunity (IOp) for 24 European countries, between 2005 and 2011. Previous estimates of IOp are lower bounds of its true level and provide a partial view of the importance of involuntarily inherited factors. Upper bound estimates of IOp are much larger than their corresponding lower bound estimates. While the lower bound estimates of IOp account for up to 31\\% of total inequality, the upper bound estimates account for up to 90.5\\%, suggesting that IOp can be as high as total inequality of outcomes. Indeed, inequality of outcomes has a higher correlation with the upper bound estimates of IOp than with the lower bound estimates, both cross sectionally and over time.","PeriodicalId":47853,"journal":{"name":"Review of Income and Wealth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Income and Wealth","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12622","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

I provide lower and upper bound estimates of inequality of opportunity (IOp) for 24 European countries, between 2005 and 2011. Previous estimates of IOp are lower bounds of its true level and provide a partial view of the importance of involuntarily inherited factors. Upper bound estimates of IOp are much larger than their corresponding lower bound estimates. While the lower bound estimates of IOp account for up to 31\% of total inequality, the upper bound estimates account for up to 90.5\%, suggesting that IOp can be as high as total inequality of outcomes. Indeed, inequality of outcomes has a higher correlation with the upper bound estimates of IOp than with the lower bound estimates, both cross sectionally and over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机会不平等的上限和下限估计:欧洲的跨国比较
我提供了2005年至2011年间24个欧洲国家的机会不平等(IOp)的下限和上限估计。以前对IOp的估计是其真实水平的下限,并提供了非自愿遗传因素重要性的部分观点。IOp的上限估计值比相应的下限估计值大得多。虽然IOp的下限估计占总不平等的31%,但上限估计占90.5%,这表明IOp可能与结果的总不平等一样高。事实上,结果的不平等与IOp的上限估计值的相关性高于与下限估计值的相关性,无论是横断面还是随时间的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The major objective of the Review of Income and Wealth is to advance knowledge on the definition, measurement and interpretation of national income, wealth and distribution. Among the issues covered are: - national and social accounting - microdata analyses of issues related to income and wealth and its distribution - the integration of micro and macro systems of economic, financial, and social statistics - international and intertemporal comparisons of income, wealth, inequality, poverty, well-being, and productivity - related problems of measurement and methodology
期刊最新文献
The Effect of the Covid‐19 Pandemic on Inequality Using machine learning to unveil the predictors of intergenerational mobility Monitoring Poverty in a Data‐Deprived Environment: The Case of Lebanon Assessing Income Convergence with a Long‐run Forecasting Approach: Some New Results The increase in earnings inequality in Italy: The role and persistence of atypical contracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1