Advances in electromagnetic methods for groundwater studies

J.D. McNeill
{"title":"Advances in electromagnetic methods for groundwater studies","authors":"J.D. McNeill","doi":"10.1016/0016-7142(91)90015-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the past decade, both inductive electromagnetic survey instrumentation and associated interpretive techniques have become refined to the point that electromagnetic techniques are widely used for geological mapping as well for the direct detection of conductive ore bodies. Electromagnetic survey techniques have been particularly successful in exploration for potable groundwater, for measuring salinity levels in aquifers and monitoring coastal saline intrusion, and for mapping soil salinity in connection with crop growth.</p><p>Regardless of the techniques employed, it is the terrain conductivity that is measured, and it is a particular advantage of electromagnetic techniques that small variations in the bulk conductivity of the terrain can often be detected. A further advantage is that most electromagnetic techniques allow measurements to be made rapidly, and survey costs are generally less than those associated with conventional DC resistivity surveys or, conversely, larger areas can be surveyed in greater detaul for comparable cost. A disadvantage of electromagnetic instrumentation is that although the shallower units cost about the same as resistivity equipment, the deeper penetration systems are relatively expensive. In general, electromagnetic systems are most effective in looking for the better conductors and are ineffective in searching for resistive material. In all cases some knowledge of electromagnetic theory is desirable for a successful interpretation.</p><p>In this paper we present several case history selected from the literature in which a variety of electromagnetic systems (horizontal loop EM, ground conductivity meters and VLF) are used either alone or in conjunction with conventional resistivity to explore for groundwater.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100579,"journal":{"name":"Geoexploration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0016-7142(91)90015-5","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoexploration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0016714291900155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

In the past decade, both inductive electromagnetic survey instrumentation and associated interpretive techniques have become refined to the point that electromagnetic techniques are widely used for geological mapping as well for the direct detection of conductive ore bodies. Electromagnetic survey techniques have been particularly successful in exploration for potable groundwater, for measuring salinity levels in aquifers and monitoring coastal saline intrusion, and for mapping soil salinity in connection with crop growth.

Regardless of the techniques employed, it is the terrain conductivity that is measured, and it is a particular advantage of electromagnetic techniques that small variations in the bulk conductivity of the terrain can often be detected. A further advantage is that most electromagnetic techniques allow measurements to be made rapidly, and survey costs are generally less than those associated with conventional DC resistivity surveys or, conversely, larger areas can be surveyed in greater detaul for comparable cost. A disadvantage of electromagnetic instrumentation is that although the shallower units cost about the same as resistivity equipment, the deeper penetration systems are relatively expensive. In general, electromagnetic systems are most effective in looking for the better conductors and are ineffective in searching for resistive material. In all cases some knowledge of electromagnetic theory is desirable for a successful interpretation.

In this paper we present several case history selected from the literature in which a variety of electromagnetic systems (horizontal loop EM, ground conductivity meters and VLF) are used either alone or in conjunction with conventional resistivity to explore for groundwater.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地下水电磁方法研究进展
在过去的十年中,感应电磁测量仪器和相关的解释技术都得到了改进,以至于电磁技术被广泛用于地质填图以及直接探测导电矿体。电磁调查技术在勘探可饮用地下水、测量含水层含盐量和监测沿海盐碱入侵以及绘制与作物生长有关的土壤含盐量图方面取得了特别成功。无论采用何种技术,测量的都是地形电导率,电磁技术的一个特别优势是,通常可以检测到地形整体电导率的微小变化。另一个优点是,大多数电磁技术允许快速测量,测量成本通常低于传统直流电阻率测量,或者相反,可以以相当的成本对更大的区域进行更详细的测量。电磁仪器的一个缺点是,虽然较浅的单位成本与电阻率设备大致相同,但较深的穿透系统相对昂贵。一般来说,电磁系统在寻找更好的导体方面是最有效的,而在寻找电阻性材料方面是无效的。在所有情况下,要想成功地作出解释,一定程度的电磁理论知识是必要的。在本文中,我们介绍了从文献中选择的几个案例历史,其中各种电磁系统(水平环路电磁、地面电导率仪和VLF)单独使用或与常规电阻率结合使用来勘探地下水。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction Numerical modeling of surface-to-borehole electromagnetic surveys for monitoring thermal enhanced oil recovery Algorithms for EOR imaging using crosshole seismic data: an experiment with scale model data Cross-borehole TEM for enhanced oil recovery: a model study Application of the cross-borehole direct-current resistivity technique for EOR process monitoring—a feasibility study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1