R&D Policy and Technological Trajectories of Regions: Evidence from the EU Framework Programmes

Wolf-Hendrik Uhlbach, P. Balland, Thomas Scherngell
{"title":"R&D Policy and Technological Trajectories of Regions: Evidence from the EU Framework Programmes","authors":"Wolf-Hendrik Uhlbach, P. Balland, Thomas Scherngell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3027919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely acknowledged that new technological specializations of regions are to a large extent driven by the recombination of existing knowledge and capabilities. Since this process is path-dependant and self-reinforcing, it can easily lead to technological lock-ins. A key issue is therefore to evaluate whether public policy can impact technological trajectories of regions and how it can be more effective. To address this issue, we analyze quantitatively and systematically the relation between R&D subsidies and new technological specializations of European regions from 1999 to 2010. R&D subsidies are identified by using the EU Framework Pro- grammes (FP) from the EUPRO database, and matched with patent documents from the OECD-REGPAT database. Using a fixed-effects linear probability model, our results indicate that FP participations have a positive but relatively small effect on the development of new specializations of regions, and that it can compensate for a lack of local related capabilities. We also find evidence that R&D subsidies have the highest impact if the level of relatedness with the new technology is neither too low (policy can not build a cathedral in the desert) nor too high (if all the capabilities are already present there is no need for policy).","PeriodicalId":11062,"journal":{"name":"Development of Innovation eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3027919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that new technological specializations of regions are to a large extent driven by the recombination of existing knowledge and capabilities. Since this process is path-dependant and self-reinforcing, it can easily lead to technological lock-ins. A key issue is therefore to evaluate whether public policy can impact technological trajectories of regions and how it can be more effective. To address this issue, we analyze quantitatively and systematically the relation between R&D subsidies and new technological specializations of European regions from 1999 to 2010. R&D subsidies are identified by using the EU Framework Pro- grammes (FP) from the EUPRO database, and matched with patent documents from the OECD-REGPAT database. Using a fixed-effects linear probability model, our results indicate that FP participations have a positive but relatively small effect on the development of new specializations of regions, and that it can compensate for a lack of local related capabilities. We also find evidence that R&D subsidies have the highest impact if the level of relatedness with the new technology is neither too low (policy can not build a cathedral in the desert) nor too high (if all the capabilities are already present there is no need for policy).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区域研发政策与技术轨迹:来自欧盟框架计划的证据
人们普遍认为,区域的新技术专业化在很大程度上是由现有知识和能力的重组所驱动的。由于这个过程是路径依赖和自我强化的,它很容易导致技术锁定。因此,一个关键问题是评估公共政策是否能够影响区域的技术轨迹,以及如何才能更有效。为了解决这一问题,我们定量系统地分析了1999 - 2010年欧洲地区研发补贴与新技术专业化之间的关系。通过使用来自EUPRO数据库的欧盟框架计划(FP)来确定研发补贴,并与来自OECD-REGPAT数据库的专利文件进行匹配。利用固定效应线性概率模型,我们的研究结果表明,计划生育参与对地区新专业发展具有积极但相对较小的影响,并且可以弥补当地相关能力的不足。我们还发现证据表明,如果与新技术的相关性水平既不太低(政策不能在沙漠中建造大教堂)也不太高(如果所有能力都已经存在,则不需要政策),那么研发补贴的影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Development Contests Financial Innovation in the 21st Century: Evidence from U.S. Patents Local Technology Adoption and Innovation: The Establishment of U.S. Airmail and the Organization of Aviation Innovation Paying off the Competition: Market Power and Innovation Incentives Conceptualizing Strategic Innovation in a Firm Context: A Theoretical Review and Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1