Study on Failure Criteria and the Numerical Simulation Method of a Coal-Based Carbon Foam under Multiaxial Loading

IF 0.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE Aerospace America Pub Date : 2023-08-17 DOI:10.3390/aerospace10080721
Q. Zhuang, Xiaoquan Cheng, Peijie Yue, Xin Guo, Kai Li
{"title":"Study on Failure Criteria and the Numerical Simulation Method of a Coal-Based Carbon Foam under Multiaxial Loading","authors":"Q. Zhuang, Xiaoquan Cheng, Peijie Yue, Xin Guo, Kai Li","doi":"10.3390/aerospace10080721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coal-based carbon foam (CCF) has broad application prospects in aerospace, composite material tooling and other fields. However, the lack of failure criteria limits its promotion. In previous studies, the failure criteria of similar materials were proposed, but there are some limitations. This paper proposes improved failure criteria based on macro-mechanical tests. Furthermore, uniaxial and multiaxial loading tests were carried out to obtain accurate failure criteria of CCF. Finally, 3-points bending tests of the CCF sandwich structure were conducted and their finite element models (FEMs) were established. The CCF test results show that the mechanical properties of CCF are transversely isotropic. The failure criteria in this paper can accurately predict the stress when the CCF fails. The error band boundary formula caused by the dispersion of the material were also given. The maximum load Pmax calculated by the failure surface (3684 N) was only 4.7% larger than the mean value measured by the test (3518 N), and all of the Pmax measured by the test (3933 N, 3640 N, 3657 N, 3269 N, 3091 N) were between the maximum value (4297 N) and minimum value (3085 N) calculated by the error band boundary formula, which means that the failure criteria have good precision.","PeriodicalId":50845,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace America","volume":"129 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace America","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10080721","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coal-based carbon foam (CCF) has broad application prospects in aerospace, composite material tooling and other fields. However, the lack of failure criteria limits its promotion. In previous studies, the failure criteria of similar materials were proposed, but there are some limitations. This paper proposes improved failure criteria based on macro-mechanical tests. Furthermore, uniaxial and multiaxial loading tests were carried out to obtain accurate failure criteria of CCF. Finally, 3-points bending tests of the CCF sandwich structure were conducted and their finite element models (FEMs) were established. The CCF test results show that the mechanical properties of CCF are transversely isotropic. The failure criteria in this paper can accurately predict the stress when the CCF fails. The error band boundary formula caused by the dispersion of the material were also given. The maximum load Pmax calculated by the failure surface (3684 N) was only 4.7% larger than the mean value measured by the test (3518 N), and all of the Pmax measured by the test (3933 N, 3640 N, 3657 N, 3269 N, 3091 N) were between the maximum value (4297 N) and minimum value (3085 N) calculated by the error band boundary formula, which means that the failure criteria have good precision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多轴载荷作用下煤基泡沫炭破坏准则及数值模拟方法研究
煤基泡沫炭在航空航天、复合材料模具等领域有着广阔的应用前景。然而,缺乏失效标准限制了其推广。在以往的研究中,提出了类似材料的失效准则,但存在一定的局限性。本文提出了基于宏观力学试验的改进失效准则。此外,还进行了单轴和多轴加载试验,获得了准确的CCF破坏准则。最后,对CCF夹层结构进行了三点弯曲试验,建立了其有限元模型。CCF试验结果表明,CCF的力学性能是横向各向同性的。本文提出的破坏准则能够准确预测CCF破坏时的应力。给出了材料色散引起的误差带边界公式。失效面计算的最大载荷Pmax值(3684 N)仅比试验测得的平均值(3518 N)大4.7%,试验测得的Pmax值(3933 N、3640 N、3657 N、3269 N、3091 N)均在误差带边界公式计算的最大值(4297 N)和最小值(3085 N)之间,说明该失效判据具有较好的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aerospace America
Aerospace America 工程技术-工程:宇航
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Novel Digital Twin Framework for Aeroengine Performance Diagnosis GPU Acceleration of CFD Simulations in OpenFOAM Recent Advances in Airfoil Self-Noise Passive Reduction Characteristics of Vortices around Forward Swept Wing at Low Speeds/High Angles of Attack A Digital-Twin-Based Detection and Protection Framework for SDC-Induced Sinkhole and Grayhole Nodes in Satellite Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1