Self-Management for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 0.8 1区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Philosophia Mathematica Pub Date : 2022-03-02 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/2681240
Zugui Wu, Rui Zhou, Yue Zhu, Ziquan Zeng, Zixuan Ye, Zhenbang Wang, Wengang Liu, Xuemeng Xu
{"title":"Self-Management for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Zugui Wu, Rui Zhou, Yue Zhu, Ziquan Zeng, Zixuan Ye, Zhenbang Wang, Wengang Liu, Xuemeng Xu","doi":"10.1155/2022/2681240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a high incidence chronic joint disease that seriously affects patients' quality of life, and current treatment methods have limited efficacy. Self-management may be an effective strategy for KOA, and clinicians have been showing increased interest recently. However, the effectiveness of self-management for KOA remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of self-management for KOA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We screened articles published in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science until September 17, 2021. The main outcomes included pain, knee function, stiffness, WOMAC (total), physical function, arthritis self-efficacy (ASE-pain), arthritis self-efficacy (ASE-other symptoms), mental health, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were finally included (<i>n</i> = 1610). Meta-analysis showed differences in pain, knee function, stiffness, ASE-pain, ASE-other symptoms, mental health, and quality of life between the self-management and control groups. Of the nine outcomes evaluated, four were highly heterogeneous, and the quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The meta-analysis results showed that self-management might help improve the pain, knee function, stiffness, ASE, mental health, and quality of life in patients with KOA. However, it has no significant effect on WOMAC (total) and physical function. Considering that this study has some limitations, we cannot draw clear conclusions based on the results of this study. Nevertheless, we offer much needed insight and encourage more rigorously designed and implemented RCTs in the future to substantiate our conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49004,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia Mathematica","volume":"14 1","pages":"2681240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia Mathematica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2681240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a high incidence chronic joint disease that seriously affects patients' quality of life, and current treatment methods have limited efficacy. Self-management may be an effective strategy for KOA, and clinicians have been showing increased interest recently. However, the effectiveness of self-management for KOA remains controversial.

Purpose: This study aims to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of self-management for KOA.

Methods: We screened articles published in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science until September 17, 2021. The main outcomes included pain, knee function, stiffness, WOMAC (total), physical function, arthritis self-efficacy (ASE-pain), arthritis self-efficacy (ASE-other symptoms), mental health, and quality of life.

Results: Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were finally included (n = 1610). Meta-analysis showed differences in pain, knee function, stiffness, ASE-pain, ASE-other symptoms, mental health, and quality of life between the self-management and control groups. Of the nine outcomes evaluated, four were highly heterogeneous, and the quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate.

Conclusion: The meta-analysis results showed that self-management might help improve the pain, knee function, stiffness, ASE, mental health, and quality of life in patients with KOA. However, it has no significant effect on WOMAC (total) and physical function. Considering that this study has some limitations, we cannot draw clear conclusions based on the results of this study. Nevertheless, we offer much needed insight and encourage more rigorously designed and implemented RCTs in the future to substantiate our conclusions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节骨性关节炎的自我管理:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。
背景:膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)是一种发病率很高的慢性关节疾病,严重影响患者的生活质量,而目前的治疗方法疗效有限。自我管理可能是治疗 KOA 的有效策略,临床医生近来对此越来越感兴趣。目的:本研究旨在系统评估 KOA 自我管理的有效性:我们筛选了截至 2021 年 9 月 17 日在 MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 上发表的文章。主要结果包括疼痛、膝关节功能、僵硬、WOMAC(总)、身体功能、关节炎自我效能(ASE-疼痛)、关节炎自我效能(ASE-其他症状)、心理健康和生活质量:最终纳入了 13 项随机对照试验(RCT)(n = 1610)。元分析表明,自我管理组和对照组在疼痛、膝关节功能、僵硬、ASE-疼痛、ASE-其他症状、心理健康和生活质量方面存在差异。在评估的九项结果中,有四项结果的异质性很高,证据质量从很低到中等不等:荟萃分析结果表明,自我管理可能有助于改善 KOA 患者的疼痛、膝关节功能、僵硬、ASE、心理健康和生活质量。然而,自我管理对 WOMAC(总)和身体功能的影响并不明显。考虑到本研究存在一定的局限性,我们无法根据本研究的结果得出明确的结论。不过,我们提供了亟需的见解,并鼓励今后进行更严格设计和实施的 RCT 研究,以证实我们的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophia Mathematica
Philosophia Mathematica HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Philosophia Mathematica is the only journal in the world devoted specifically to philosophy of mathematics. The journal publishes peer-reviewed new work in philosophy of mathematics, the application of mathematics, and computing. In addition to main articles, sometimes grouped on a single theme, there are shorter discussion notes, letters, and book reviews. The journal is published online-only, with three issues published per year.
期刊最新文献
The Logic of Potential Infinity Predicative Classes and Strict Potentialism Is Iteration an Object of Intuition? A Taxonomy for Set-Theoretic Potentialism Up with Categories, Down with Sets; Out with Categories, In with Sets!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1