Inoculation against Populism: Media Competence Education and Political Autonomy

IF 0.9 Q3 ETHICS Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.1515/mopp-2018-0035
Frodo Podschwadek
{"title":"Inoculation against Populism: Media Competence Education and Political Autonomy","authors":"Frodo Podschwadek","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2018-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper offers an analysis of the relation between political populism and mass media, and how this relation becomes problematic for democratic societies. It focuses on the fact that mass media, due to their purpose and infrastructure, can unintentionally reinforce populist messages. Research findings from communication science and political psychology are used to illustrate how, for example, a combination of mass media agenda setting and motivated reasoning can influence citizens’ political decisions and impair their political autonomy. This poses a particular normative challenge for modern democracies: how to counter these populism-supporting effects within the constraints of democratic legitimacy? After showing how severely limited legal measures to curb populist media effects would be, the paper argues in favour of media competence education as a way of providing future citizens with an epistemic toolkit to navigate the media environment and strengthen their political autonomy.","PeriodicalId":37108,"journal":{"name":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","volume":"38 1","pages":"211 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2018-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper offers an analysis of the relation between political populism and mass media, and how this relation becomes problematic for democratic societies. It focuses on the fact that mass media, due to their purpose and infrastructure, can unintentionally reinforce populist messages. Research findings from communication science and political psychology are used to illustrate how, for example, a combination of mass media agenda setting and motivated reasoning can influence citizens’ political decisions and impair their political autonomy. This poses a particular normative challenge for modern democracies: how to counter these populism-supporting effects within the constraints of democratic legitimacy? After showing how severely limited legal measures to curb populist media effects would be, the paper argues in favour of media competence education as a way of providing future citizens with an epistemic toolkit to navigate the media environment and strengthen their political autonomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防民粹主义:媒介能力教育与政治自主
本文分析了政治民粹主义与大众传媒之间的关系,以及这种关系如何成为民主社会的问题。它关注的事实是,大众媒体由于其目的和基础设施,可能会无意中强化民粹主义信息。传播科学和政治心理学的研究结果被用来说明,例如,大众媒体议程设置和动机推理的结合如何影响公民的政治决策并损害他们的政治自主权。这对现代民主国家提出了一个特殊的规范挑战:如何在民主合法性的约束下对抗这些支持民粹主义的影响?在展示了限制民粹主义媒体影响的法律措施是多么有限之后,本文主张支持媒体能力教育,为未来公民提供一种知识工具包,以驾驭媒体环境并加强他们的政治自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Moral Philosophy and Politics
Moral Philosophy and Politics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Why Military Conditioning Violates the Human Dignity of Soldiers Moral Reasoning in the Climate Crisis: A Personal Guide Applying Different Concepts and Conceptions of Legitimacy to the International Level: Service, Free Group Agents, and Autonomy Hybrid Ethical Theory and Cohen’s Critique of Rawls’s Egalitarian Liberalism Ideal Theory and Real Politics: The Politics in Political Liberalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1