What does it mean for a data subject to make their personal data ‘manifestly public’? An analysis of GDPR Article 9(2)(e)

IF 2.6 4区 社会学 Q1 LAW International Data Privacy Law Pub Date : 2021-02-23 DOI:10.1093/IDPL/IPAB005
E. Dove, Jiahong Chen
{"title":"What does it mean for a data subject to make their personal data ‘manifestly public’? An analysis of GDPR Article 9(2)(e)","authors":"E. Dove, Jiahong Chen","doi":"10.1093/IDPL/IPAB005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates an under-discussed and potentially significant provision in the EU General Data Protection Regulation, namely Article 9(2)(e), which permits processing of special category personal data if the “processing relates to personal data which are manifestly made public by the data subject”. We specifically consider the application of this provision in the context of genetic data and open data sharing (i.e. data that can be freely used, re-used, and redistributed by anyone), illustrating this by way of several cases of initiatives that seek to share genetic data. We query whether by uploading one’s own genetic data onto the internet, a person has made their data “manifestly public” within the meaning of the GDPR. Our response to this query is that in general, the answer should be no, but it remains possible. We argue that Article 9(2)(e) must be construed narrowly; outside of clearly defined contexts, it would be legally inappropriate to invoke and rely upon this manifestly public self-disclosure exception in data protection law. Our narrow interpretation of the provision aligns with the limited guidance made available from data protection authorities. As part of this argument, we propose a legal test that must be satisfied before Article 9(2)(e) may be lawfully invoked, grounded in the intent of the data subject.","PeriodicalId":51749,"journal":{"name":"International Data Privacy Law","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Data Privacy Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/IDPL/IPAB005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates an under-discussed and potentially significant provision in the EU General Data Protection Regulation, namely Article 9(2)(e), which permits processing of special category personal data if the “processing relates to personal data which are manifestly made public by the data subject”. We specifically consider the application of this provision in the context of genetic data and open data sharing (i.e. data that can be freely used, re-used, and redistributed by anyone), illustrating this by way of several cases of initiatives that seek to share genetic data. We query whether by uploading one’s own genetic data onto the internet, a person has made their data “manifestly public” within the meaning of the GDPR. Our response to this query is that in general, the answer should be no, but it remains possible. We argue that Article 9(2)(e) must be construed narrowly; outside of clearly defined contexts, it would be legally inappropriate to invoke and rely upon this manifestly public self-disclosure exception in data protection law. Our narrow interpretation of the provision aligns with the limited guidance made available from data protection authorities. As part of this argument, we propose a legal test that must be satisfied before Article 9(2)(e) may be lawfully invoked, grounded in the intent of the data subject.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资料当事人将其个人资料“明显公开”是什么意思?GDPR第9(2)(e)条分析
本文调查了欧盟通用数据保护条例中一个未被充分讨论且可能具有重要意义的条款,即第9(2)(e)条,该条款允许处理特殊类别的个人数据,如果“处理与数据主体明显公开的个人数据相关”。我们特别考虑了这一规定在遗传数据和开放数据共享(即任何人都可以自由使用、再利用和再分发的数据)背景下的应用,并通过几个寻求共享遗传数据的倡议案例来说明这一点。我们质疑通过将自己的基因数据上传到互联网上,一个人是否已经使他们的数据在GDPR的意义上“明显公开”。我们对这个问题的回答是,一般来说,答案应该是否定的,但这仍然是可能的。我们认为,第9(2)(e)条必须狭义地解释;在明确定义的背景之外,援引和依赖数据保护法中这种明显的公开自我披露例外在法律上是不合适的。我们对该条款的狭义解释与数据保护当局提供的有限指导一致。作为这一论点的一部分,我们提出了一个法律测试,该测试必须在基于数据主体的意图合法援引第9(2)(e)条之前得到满足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Transferring personal data to international organizations under the GDPR: an analysis of the transfer mechanisms Re-thinking the allocation of roles under the GDPR in the context of cloud computing The interplay between machine learning and data minimization under the GDPR: the case of Google’s topics API Code as personal data: implications for data protection law and regulation of algorithms Simple and advanced reflexivity in GDPR enforcement: empirical evidence from DPA activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1