A Generative Model for Income and Capital Inequality

Q4 Social Sciences Sociological Theory and Methods Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.11218/OJJAMS.31.242
Hiroshi Hamada
{"title":"A Generative Model for Income and Capital Inequality","authors":"Hiroshi Hamada","doi":"10.11218/OJJAMS.31.242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to formalize a generative model for income and capital inequality by focusing on the accumulation process of human and network capital. Using this model, we attempt to provide theoretical explanations to three empirical questions. First, why is the relationship between economic growth and income inequality expressed as an inverted U-curve? Second, why does societal relative deprivation increase when economic growth rises (the so-called China puzzle)? Third, why is income inequality stable despite the reduction of human capital inequality? The model assumes that people in a society experience repeatedly random chances of gaining capital interest with a success probability p . People gain additional capital as an interest when they succeed and incur a cost when they fail randomly. We show that the capital distribution approaches a lognormal distribution, and as an output of Cobb–Douglas production function, income distribution is also subject to a lognormal distribution. Analyzing the Gini coefficient and the average income as a function of parameters of the model, we derive the following implications. 1) The inverted U-curve is realized by the expansion of success chance. 2) The China puzzle occurs because the increase of average income and Gini coefficient are simultaneously followed by the expansion of success probability p under the range p ∈ (0,0.5). 3) The income inequality is stable, though human capital inequality decreases because of human and network capital elasticity and network capital diminishes the impact of human capital equalization on income inequality. In Section 4, we conclude the study and outline areas for further studies.","PeriodicalId":39496,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Theory and Methods","volume":"29 1","pages":"242-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Theory and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11218/OJJAMS.31.242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to formalize a generative model for income and capital inequality by focusing on the accumulation process of human and network capital. Using this model, we attempt to provide theoretical explanations to three empirical questions. First, why is the relationship between economic growth and income inequality expressed as an inverted U-curve? Second, why does societal relative deprivation increase when economic growth rises (the so-called China puzzle)? Third, why is income inequality stable despite the reduction of human capital inequality? The model assumes that people in a society experience repeatedly random chances of gaining capital interest with a success probability p . People gain additional capital as an interest when they succeed and incur a cost when they fail randomly. We show that the capital distribution approaches a lognormal distribution, and as an output of Cobb–Douglas production function, income distribution is also subject to a lognormal distribution. Analyzing the Gini coefficient and the average income as a function of parameters of the model, we derive the following implications. 1) The inverted U-curve is realized by the expansion of success chance. 2) The China puzzle occurs because the increase of average income and Gini coefficient are simultaneously followed by the expansion of success probability p under the range p ∈ (0,0.5). 3) The income inequality is stable, though human capital inequality decreases because of human and network capital elasticity and network capital diminishes the impact of human capital equalization on income inequality. In Section 4, we conclude the study and outline areas for further studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收入和资本不平等的生成模型
本研究的目的是通过关注人力资本和网络资本的积累过程,形式化收入和资本不平等的生成模型。利用这一模型,我们试图为三个实证问题提供理论解释。首先,为什么经济增长和收入不平等之间的关系表现为倒u型曲线?第二,为什么社会相对剥夺会随着经济增长而增加(所谓的中国之谜)?第三,为什么在人力资本不平等减少的情况下,收入不平等保持稳定?该模型假设一个社会中的人们以成功概率p反复随机获得资本利益的机会。当人们成功时,他们会获得额外的资本作为利息,而当他们随机失败时,他们会产生成本。我们发现资本分布接近对数正态分布,收入分布作为柯布-道格拉斯生产函数的输出,也服从对数正态分布。分析基尼系数和平均收入作为模型参数的函数,我们得出以下启示。1)倒u型曲线是通过成功机会的扩大实现的。2)中国谜题的出现是因为在p∈(0,0.5)的范围内,平均收入和基尼系数的增加同时伴随着成功概率p的扩大。(3)收入不平等是稳定的,但人力资本不平等由于人力资本和网络资本的弹性而减小,网络资本减弱了人力资本均等化对收入不平等的影响。在第4节中,我们总结了研究并概述了进一步研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Theory and Methods
Sociological Theory and Methods Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An online survey with a large sample-size: A case of the survey for demonstrators after the Great East Japan Earthquake How to do online experiments: An example of an online experiment with crowdsourcing service Ideological and Behavioral Perspectives on Online Political Polarization: Evidence from Japan Can the signaling game serve as a model of statistical discrimination in hiring Life-Is-like-a-Random-Walk Model of Class Identification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1