Economic Consequences of SFAS 142 Goodwill Write‐Offs

H. Jarva
{"title":"Economic Consequences of SFAS 142 Goodwill Write‐Offs","authors":"H. Jarva","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-629X.2012.00495.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"type=\"main\" xml:lang=\"en\"> This paper examines the economic consequences of goodwill write-offs under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS 142). Although write-off firms have performed poorly, it is evident that deteriorating economic performance explains only a small proportion of write-offs. After controlling for endogeneity of write-off choice, I fail to find evidence that investors and analysts fixate on SFAS 142 goodwill write-offs. I also provide evidence that write-off firms pay higher audit fees, suggesting that auditors charge higher fees in response to extra audit effort. These results are consistent with the principles of market efficiency, analyst-forecast rationality and efficient audit pricing.","PeriodicalId":23644,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Journal of Business Finance & Accounting","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Journal of Business Finance & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2012.00495.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

type="main" xml:lang="en"> This paper examines the economic consequences of goodwill write-offs under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS 142). Although write-off firms have performed poorly, it is evident that deteriorating economic performance explains only a small proportion of write-offs. After controlling for endogeneity of write-off choice, I fail to find evidence that investors and analysts fixate on SFAS 142 goodwill write-offs. I also provide evidence that write-off firms pay higher audit fees, suggesting that auditors charge higher fees in response to extra audit effort. These results are consistent with the principles of market efficiency, analyst-forecast rationality and efficient audit pricing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
sas142商誉核销的经济后果
type="main" xml:lang="en">本文考察了《财务会计准则第142号》(sas142)下商誉核销的经济后果。虽然注销公司表现不佳,但很明显,恶化的经济表现只能解释一小部分注销。在控制了冲销选择的内生性后,我没有找到证据表明投资者和分析师关注SFAS 142的商誉冲销。我还提供证据表明,核销公司支付更高的审计费用,这表明审计师收取更高的费用,以应对额外的审计工作。这些结果符合市场效率原则、分析预测合理性原则和有效审计定价原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sustainability of the Accounting and Finance Academic Profession: Students’ and Supervisors’ Views About the Phd Supervision Process Transforming Accounting Curricula to Enhance Integrative Learning IASB's Independence in the Due Process: An Examination of Interest Groups’ Influence on the Development of IFRS 9 Structural Holes and Hedge Fund Return Comovement: Evidence from Network‐Connected Stock Hedge Funds in China The Pricing of Accruals Quality in Credit Default Swap Spreads
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1