A systematic review of the available literature on the use of social media in brain tumor

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Global Knowledge Memory and Communication Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.1108/gkmc-11-2022-0254
Hossein Motahari-Nezhad
{"title":"A systematic review of the available literature on the use of social media in brain tumor","authors":"Hossein Motahari-Nezhad","doi":"10.1108/gkmc-11-2022-0254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe use of social media is one of the new technological options that has been recommended as a potential new strategy for delivering high-quality, high-value cancer prevention and management services. Despite the increasing use of social media, little research has been done on the use of social media in brain tumors. Therefore, this systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive review of the use of social media in brain tumor research.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to August 1, 2022. English full-text articles evaluating social media use, benefit or content in brain tumor were considered.\n\n\nFindings\nSixteen documents satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Most of the included studies (n = 11/16) were conducted and published by researchers in the USA. In terms of social media platform, most studies focused on Twitter (8/16, 50%) and YouTube (8/16, 50%), followed by Facebook (6/16, 37.5%) and Instagram (4/16, 25%). Most studies (n = 7/12) analyzed the content of brain tumor information provided on social media, followed by patients’ use of social media (n = 3/12) and the quality of information on social media (n = 3/12). The other three articles also examined patient recruitment, crowdfunding and caregiver use of social media.\n\n\nPractical implications\nBy identifying the use, benefits and content of social media platforms in different settings, patients, clinicians and policymakers can better benefit from harnessing the power of social media in different ways, leading to improved health-care services.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the authors knowledge, this is the first study to systematically examine social media use, benefits and content status in brain tumors.\n","PeriodicalId":43718,"journal":{"name":"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-11-2022-0254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The use of social media is one of the new technological options that has been recommended as a potential new strategy for delivering high-quality, high-value cancer prevention and management services. Despite the increasing use of social media, little research has been done on the use of social media in brain tumors. Therefore, this systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive review of the use of social media in brain tumor research. Design/methodology/approach A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to August 1, 2022. English full-text articles evaluating social media use, benefit or content in brain tumor were considered. Findings Sixteen documents satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Most of the included studies (n = 11/16) were conducted and published by researchers in the USA. In terms of social media platform, most studies focused on Twitter (8/16, 50%) and YouTube (8/16, 50%), followed by Facebook (6/16, 37.5%) and Instagram (4/16, 25%). Most studies (n = 7/12) analyzed the content of brain tumor information provided on social media, followed by patients’ use of social media (n = 3/12) and the quality of information on social media (n = 3/12). The other three articles also examined patient recruitment, crowdfunding and caregiver use of social media. Practical implications By identifying the use, benefits and content of social media platforms in different settings, patients, clinicians and policymakers can better benefit from harnessing the power of social media in different ways, leading to improved health-care services. Originality/value To the authors knowledge, this is the first study to systematically examine social media use, benefits and content status in brain tumors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对脑肿瘤患者使用社交媒体的现有文献进行系统回顾
目的使用社交媒体是一种新的技术选择,已被推荐为提供高质量、高价值的癌症预防和管理服务的潜在新策略。尽管社交媒体的使用越来越多,但关于社交媒体在脑肿瘤中的使用的研究却很少。因此,本系统综述旨在全面回顾社交媒体在脑肿瘤研究中的应用。设计/方法/方法系统检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science,检索时间从论文成立到2022年8月1日。评估社交媒体在脑肿瘤中的使用、益处或内容的英文全文文章被考虑在内。16份文献符合纳入标准,纳入最终分析。大多数纳入的研究(n = 11/16)是由美国的研究人员进行和发表的。在社交媒体平台方面,研究最多的是Twitter(8/16, 50%)和YouTube(8/16, 50%),其次是Facebook(6/16, 37.5%)和Instagram(4/16, 25%)。大多数研究(n = 7/12)分析了社交媒体上提供的脑肿瘤信息的内容,其次是患者对社交媒体的使用情况(n = 3/12)和社交媒体上信息的质量(n = 3/12)。另外三篇文章还研究了患者招募、众筹和护理人员使用社交媒体的情况。通过确定社交媒体平台在不同环境中的使用、益处和内容,患者、临床医生和政策制定者可以以不同方式更好地利用社交媒体的力量,从而改善医疗保健服务。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一个系统地研究脑肿瘤患者使用社交媒体的好处和内容状况的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
77
期刊最新文献
Mapping covid-19 and transportation: a taxonomical study using bibliometric visualisation The persistence of print books: exploring language preference and format preference among Arabic-speaking library patrons in Jordan A checklist to publish collections as data in GLAM institutions A systematic literature review on the use of mobile phones to access library services and resources: challenges and benefits Citation analysis and mapping of genetics research in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1