Efeito da técnica de inserção e do tempo de fotoativação na dureza de resinas compostas bulk fill

João Felipe Besegato, Débora de Castro Costa Petrin, Giovana Rosa da Costa, L. Ferraresso, Márcio Grama Hoeppner
{"title":"Efeito da técnica de inserção e do tempo de fotoativação na dureza de resinas compostas bulk fill","authors":"João Felipe Besegato, Débora de Castro Costa Petrin, Giovana Rosa da Costa, L. Ferraresso, Márcio Grama Hoeppner","doi":"10.11606/issn.2357-8041.clrd.2020.170336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study evaluated the effect of filling techniques and light-curing time on Vickers hardness of bulk fill composite resins (BFCR). Methods: BFCR high viscosity Opus Bulk Fill (OBF) and low viscosity Opus Bulk Fill Flow (OBFF), were placed in cylindrical samples of poly methyl methacrylate with height and internal diameter of 4 mm, and randomly assigned into six groups (G) according to the filling technique (I1-single increment of 4 mm thickness and I2 – increment of 2 mm thickness) and light-curing time of each increment with an irradiance of 1000 mW/cm2 (T1 – 20 seconds and T2 – 40 seconds): G1 – OBFI1T1, G2 – OBFI2T1, G3 – OBFI1T2, G4 – OBFI2T2, G5 – OBFF+OBFI2T1 e G6 – OBFF+OBFI2T2. Hardness was measured in the top and bottom surface of each sample. Twoway ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test were used for analysis with a significance level of 5%. Results: There was no difference in hardness on the top surface, regardless of the filling technique and light-curing exposure time used. However, in the bottom surface differences were observed regarding the filling technique and light-curing time, except between the G3 and G4 groups. All samples showed significant hardness reduction at the bottom compared to the top surface. Conclusions: The lowest light-curing time (20 seconds) must be considered with caution, as it resulted in the reduction of hardness in the area farther from the light source. The OBFF exhibited lower hardness than OBF, despite of the light-curing exposure time.","PeriodicalId":10204,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Laboratorial Research in Dentistry","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Laboratorial Research in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2357-8041.clrd.2020.170336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the effect of filling techniques and light-curing time on Vickers hardness of bulk fill composite resins (BFCR). Methods: BFCR high viscosity Opus Bulk Fill (OBF) and low viscosity Opus Bulk Fill Flow (OBFF), were placed in cylindrical samples of poly methyl methacrylate with height and internal diameter of 4 mm, and randomly assigned into six groups (G) according to the filling technique (I1-single increment of 4 mm thickness and I2 – increment of 2 mm thickness) and light-curing time of each increment with an irradiance of 1000 mW/cm2 (T1 – 20 seconds and T2 – 40 seconds): G1 – OBFI1T1, G2 – OBFI2T1, G3 – OBFI1T2, G4 – OBFI2T2, G5 – OBFF+OBFI2T1 e G6 – OBFF+OBFI2T2. Hardness was measured in the top and bottom surface of each sample. Twoway ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test were used for analysis with a significance level of 5%. Results: There was no difference in hardness on the top surface, regardless of the filling technique and light-curing exposure time used. However, in the bottom surface differences were observed regarding the filling technique and light-curing time, except between the G3 and G4 groups. All samples showed significant hardness reduction at the bottom compared to the top surface. Conclusions: The lowest light-curing time (20 seconds) must be considered with caution, as it resulted in the reduction of hardness in the area farther from the light source. The OBFF exhibited lower hardness than OBF, despite of the light-curing exposure time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
插入技术和光活化时间对散装填充复合树脂硬度的影响
目的:研究填充工艺和光固化时间对体积填充复合树脂维氏硬度的影响。方法:将高粘度Opus Bulk Fill (OBF)和低粘度Opus Bulk Fill Flow (OBFF)分别放置于高度和内径为4mm的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯圆柱形样品中,根据填充技术(1-单次增量4mm厚度,2 -增量2mm厚度)和每次增量光固化时间(T1 - 20秒,T2 - 40秒)随机分为6组(G):G1 - OBFI1T1, G2 - OBFI2T1, G3 - OBFI1T2, G4 - OBFI2T2, G5 - OBFF+OBFI2T1和G6 - OBFF+OBFI2T2。在每个样品的上下表面测量硬度。采用双因素方差分析和Tukey后验,显著性水平为5%。结果:无论充填方式和光固化时间如何,上面硬度无明显差异。而在底表面,除了G3和G4组之间,填充技术和光固化时间存在差异。与上表面相比,所有样品的底部硬度都明显降低。结论:最低光固化时间(20秒)会导致离光源较远区域的硬度降低,必须谨慎考虑。光固化时间不同,OBFF的硬度低于OBF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recorrências locais de tumores de glândulas salivares em uma população brasileira Utilização da distração óssea no tratamento de pacientes com Sequência de Pierre Robin Relação entre alterações ósseas detectadas na panorâmica e osteoporose Comparison of the accuracy of linear measurements in CBCT images with different field of views Antimicrobial photodynamic and photobiomodulation adjuvant therapies for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw – Report of two cases with long-term follow-up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1