Prevalence of patch testing and methodology of dermatologists in the U.S.: Results of a cross-sectional survey

Erin M. Warshaw, David Nelson
{"title":"Prevalence of patch testing and methodology of dermatologists in the U.S.: Results of a cross-sectional survey","authors":"Erin M. Warshaw,&nbsp;David Nelson","doi":"10.1053/ajcd.2002.32856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> Patch testing is considered to be the standard for diagnosis of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions of the skin (allergic contact dermatitis). <strong>Objective:</strong> The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of patch testing by US dermatologists and associated practice characteristics. <strong>Methods:</strong> One-third of US Fellows of the American Academy of Dermatology were sampled systematically with a written survey. Responses from this survey were compared with responses from a 1990 survey of dermatologists. <strong>Results:</strong> Eighty-three percent of responding dermatologists stated that they performed patch testing in their practice. Whereas the majority of patch testing dermatologists (52%) used a 48-hour, 96-hour patch test reading schedule, 26% performed a single reading at 48 or 72 hours. Among patch testing dermatologists, most (74%) used TRUE Test, and many (44%) did so because it was less time consuming for staff. Many dermatologists (46%) felt that they were patch testing more patients now than when TRUE Test was not available. Eleven percent of dermatologists who patch tested also photopatch tested. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> The proportion of US dermatologists who patch test has significantly increased from 1990 to 1997 (<em>P</em> [lt ] .0001). Whereas the majority of US dermatologists patch test, one quarter of those who do so perform only a single reading.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7653,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis","volume":"13 2","pages":"Pages 53-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/ajcd.2002.32856","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046199X02456606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Background: Patch testing is considered to be the standard for diagnosis of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions of the skin (allergic contact dermatitis). Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of patch testing by US dermatologists and associated practice characteristics. Methods: One-third of US Fellows of the American Academy of Dermatology were sampled systematically with a written survey. Responses from this survey were compared with responses from a 1990 survey of dermatologists. Results: Eighty-three percent of responding dermatologists stated that they performed patch testing in their practice. Whereas the majority of patch testing dermatologists (52%) used a 48-hour, 96-hour patch test reading schedule, 26% performed a single reading at 48 or 72 hours. Among patch testing dermatologists, most (74%) used TRUE Test, and many (44%) did so because it was less time consuming for staff. Many dermatologists (46%) felt that they were patch testing more patients now than when TRUE Test was not available. Eleven percent of dermatologists who patch tested also photopatch tested. Conclusions: The proportion of US dermatologists who patch test has significantly increased from 1990 to 1997 (P [lt ] .0001). Whereas the majority of US dermatologists patch test, one quarter of those who do so perform only a single reading.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国皮肤科医生补丁测试的流行程度和方法:一项横断面调查的结果
背景:斑贴试验被认为是诊断皮肤迟发性超敏反应(过敏性接触性皮炎)的标准方法。目的:本研究的目的是检查美国皮肤科医生的贴片测试的流行程度和相关的实践特点。方法:对三分之一的美国皮肤病学会研究员进行系统的书面调查。本次调查的回答与1990年皮肤科医生调查的回答进行了比较。结果:83%的受访皮肤科医生表示,他们在实践中进行了斑贴试验。虽然大多数皮肤医生(52%)使用48小时或96小时的贴片测试阅读时间表,但26%的人在48小时或72小时进行一次阅读。在进行贴片测试的皮肤科医生中,大多数(74%)使用TRUE Test,许多(44%)这样做是因为这对工作人员来说更省时。许多皮肤科医生(46%)认为,与没有TRUE Test时相比,他们现在对更多的患者进行了补丁测试。11%做过贴片测试的皮肤科医生也做过光贴测试。结论:从1990年到1997年,美国皮肤科医生进行斑贴试验的比例显著增加(P [lt] .0001)。然而,大多数美国皮肤科医生进行斑贴测试,其中四分之一的人只进行一次读数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS OF THE FEET LONG-TERM STUDY ON PRIMARY PREVENTION OF IRRITANT CONTACT DERMATITIS A REVIEW OF PATCH TESTING WITH PRESERVATIVES AT ST. JOHNʼS INSTITUTE OF DERMATOLOGY FROM 1995 TO 2000 CONTACT ALLERGY TO METAL AND TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY QUALITY OF LIFE ANALYSIS IN PATIENTS WITH HAND DERMATITIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1