“Let’s Talk about Sex”: Expanding Advice Response Theory to Sexual Advice-Seeking

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION Southern Communication Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-17 DOI:10.1080/1041794X.2023.2168740
Andre Fedd, Jennifer A. Samp
{"title":"“Let’s Talk about Sex”: Expanding Advice Response Theory to Sexual Advice-Seeking","authors":"Andre Fedd, Jennifer A. Samp","doi":"10.1080/1041794X.2023.2168740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Communicating about sex with close friends (i.e., support providers) can shape perceptions about sex and sexuality. Drawing from Advice Response Theory (ART) we considered support recipients’ dispositional traits (i.e., sexual sensation seeking) as an intervening variable on advice outcomes. Support recipients (N= 270) reported on support providers persuasive efforts, their trait sensation seeking, advice message content, and advice outcomes. Results indicated that support recipients evaluated advice message content based on their perceptions of altering and novel perspectives, and the quality of advice messages. Although recipients perceived that altering their perspectives influenced greater sensation seeking, novel sexual messages were perceived to be more efficacious, feasible, and with few limitations. Support providers who aimed to change recipients’ perspectives about sex were perceived to be less efficacious, and feasible to do. Theoretical and practical implications are provided.","PeriodicalId":46274,"journal":{"name":"Southern Communication Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2023.2168740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Communicating about sex with close friends (i.e., support providers) can shape perceptions about sex and sexuality. Drawing from Advice Response Theory (ART) we considered support recipients’ dispositional traits (i.e., sexual sensation seeking) as an intervening variable on advice outcomes. Support recipients (N= 270) reported on support providers persuasive efforts, their trait sensation seeking, advice message content, and advice outcomes. Results indicated that support recipients evaluated advice message content based on their perceptions of altering and novel perspectives, and the quality of advice messages. Although recipients perceived that altering their perspectives influenced greater sensation seeking, novel sexual messages were perceived to be more efficacious, feasible, and with few limitations. Support providers who aimed to change recipients’ perspectives about sex were perceived to be less efficacious, and feasible to do. Theoretical and practical implications are provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“让我们谈谈性”:将建议反应理论扩展到性咨询寻求
与亲密的朋友(即支持提供者)交流性可以塑造对性和性的看法。根据建议反应理论(ART),我们考虑了支持接受者的性格特征(即性感觉寻求)作为建议结果的干预变量。支持接受者(N= 270)报告了支持提供者的说服努力、他们的特质感觉寻求、建议信息内容和建议结果。结果表明,支持接受者根据他们对改变和新颖观点的看法以及建议信息的质量来评估建议信息的内容。虽然接受者认为改变他们的观点会影响更大的感觉寻求,但新奇的性信息被认为更有效、可行,而且几乎没有限制。旨在改变接受者对性的看法的支持提供者被认为效率较低,而且可行。提供了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Dominant Factors Driving Civic Engagement on of the Bandung City Government’s Social Media Instructor Communicative Behaviors as Cultivators of Students’ Task Value Managing Jealousy within Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships: A Critical Discursive Psychological Approach Explicating the Pathways Among Memorable Message Themes About Religion and Spirituality, Positive Role Models for Aging, and Successful Aging Understanding Media Effects Through Media Technological Attributes: Young People’s Second Screening Use and Political Efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1